Reply With Quote
wc and yonivore.
wc and yonivore.
I'm going to guess Trill Clinton.
yea its a given WC can't fight to save his life
@TLong- I'd knock yo old ass out.
Horse and rascal are pretty easy picks.
I don't know who rascal is and not too familiar with Horse, other than that roast thread.
I don't know, if he's as persistent when it comes to fighting as he was in that thread he may be a tough opponent. the type that could take a punch and keep coming.
Almost everyone.
Who was that one poster who said he never rolls alone?
tbh I wouldn't think he would put up much of a fight if he was by himself imho
Any dude that is scared to lick a chicks Fawtbox can't fight worth a damn...........
Silverblk Mystix
"I'm a lover-not a fighter!"
...but Blake and mdumpster would probably put up one of a catfight...
^ You do your sword fighting with your . Known knowledge.
I am deeply offended by that sexual connotation.
You should watch yourself.
You're pretty much on the top of the list here. Intolerantly obsessing over forum members sexual preferences, attacking forum members for being gay and generally hiding your enormous vagina behind that computer screen of yours. You're one of the biggest cowards this forum has ever seen.
All the hardcore self appointed defenders of sexuality are probably at the top of the list.
It all comes down to cardio conditioning if you aren't a pro fighter. Nobody can really fight (just put them up against a real fighter) so it's who can last the longest. A small cat in shape would whip up on a big bar bully with no cardio.
Nobody here however strikes me as somebody I would need to worry about.
Naw, I just want to see society move to a better place by allowing consenting adults to pursue happiness.
Parades?
Not necessarily the case.
It all comes down to human rights to be honest.
Would you say that if a white person is defending a black person that the one doing the defending is black? I dont think so.
when were they ever not allowed to?
gays shouldn't need my approval to do what they do. as long as they aren't imprisoned or beaten or lawfully discriminated based upon their orientation, then they can't expect to force the rest of us to agree with their lifestyle.
Which gay poster did I attack? You?
I thought you were an angry queen for chrissakes! I have nothing against queens.
I don't tolerate anyone abusing angry queens and I won't vote for anyone trying to pass a law that discriminates against angry queens!
I hope we are clear on that.
They're not allowed to get married.
There is no good reason not to let them.
So you are just being a dip .Which gay poster did I attack? You?
I thought you were an angry queen for chrissakes! I have nothing against queens.
I don't tolerate anyone abusing angry queens and I won't vote for anyone trying to pass a law that discriminates against angry queens!
I hope we are clear on that.
Thanks for the clarification
I do agree they should be able to marry.
I am against two men trying to raise a child however.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
