Reply With Quote
you rang?
the Bane of Albuquerque
Without getting too annoyingly girlish about it, let me just say that the Heisenberg look really, really, really works on Tom...
you rang?
the Bane of Albuquerque
Its going to take an amazing movie to live up to the hype for this. I'm not giving it much of a chance to do that, but I'll be going in and trying to evaluate it just based on its merits and not the hype. I expect Nolan to deliver good movie even if it doesn't live up to TDK standards (although BB was amazing too so maybe he will).
If this wad intended to be some transcendent trilogy, picking scarecrow for the major first villain, then having two face as a thirty minute villain, only to conclude with Anne Hathaway as freaking catwoman is stupid.
there's no way this movie lives up to the hype and build up. I'll check it once the first wave of fan boys settles down. Frankly I expect it to be better than TDK. I expect Nolan told bale to tone down the ridiculous Batman voice, and of course, I thought TDK was mediocre, so not really a high bar to overcome IMO.
^ What are you even talking about with that first sentence?
To me, the order and treatment of villains has been mishandled
Two face was a thirty minute villain, after being such a great protagonist
Now as the side character, we get princess diaries cat woman. Anne will be criticized the rest of her career if she messes this role up. A cheap cat woman would make the overall character arc of the trilogy laughable.
I think it's already been pretty clearly established that I think your stubbornly contrarian stance on Nolan's Batman films is a load of hooey and is more than likely a shtick developed in order to avoid saying you were wrong about The Dark Knight to begin with, so I'm not going to even bother getting into that.
BUT...
LOL at criticizing Nolan's handling of Batman villains in two consecutive posts while intentionally avoiding mention of Neeson/Ra's al Ghul, Ledger/Joker, or Hardy/Bane.
^ Yes. Ra's was the main villain of the first one, not Scarecrow. And focusing on Two Face (who wasn't the main villain of TDK) and Catwoman (who won't even qualify as a villain to anybody who watches the trailers) is pretty dumb.
I'm saying so far these guys have been shoehorned in
Its mishandled
Jamie Ottley @JayOttley
The Dark Knight Rises was the masterpiece of all comic films, the best was saved for last... Oscar for Best Picture and Bane as Tom Hardy
mmkay.....where's the review? Where was the advanced screening held? Not one Top Critic has posted anything as of yet on Rotten Tomatoes.
Critics aren't allowed to release reviews until the 20th.
deadmau5, seriously? You better be no older than 16 tbh
Wrong.
Jay Ottley is legit and I read some of his stuff in the past. I'm interested to get his thorough take on it if he's seen the movie.
Twitter posts are not full reviews
But legit critics were invited
as i've said already, ledger offing himself was not part of nolan's plan
Some of my twitter sources say Nolan supplied Mary Kate Olsen with bunk pills, the day she hooked up heath ledger with his fix
The actor who plays the doctor threw me off because of what roles he usually plays, but someone mentioned he also played a doctor in Memento so he has the Nolan connection.
stupid double post can someone delete this, thanks
Last edited by ace3g; 07-10-2012 at 01:34 PM.
Lt. Dangle
Kimmel had Oldman on tonight and Jimmy revealed that even he was at the LA private screening, so much for legit critics.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
