Shooting in Batman premiere?

[djohn2oo8]

And we already have a justice system and laws to punish those who inflict this kind of damage.....

The point should be to deter another Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, etc. Have we? Sick, evil people don't give two s about the justice system.

[ChumpDumper]

I didn't send you a pm threat, you can post it if you want.

I will say it here since you can't see things afresh and are clinging to past butthurts.

I said to you that you clearly started this by throwing out the mustang barb.
I asked if you really want to start up again and that it is played out. I said I can do this all day and so can you.
But why?

Pretty reasonable IMO.

What about let bygones be bygones and discuss the topic without the insults?

I can.

Can you?

You started right in with the insults again (cue "you did it first" whining).

you and your thin skin. Stop making this thread about you.

[silverblk mystix]

The point should be to deter another Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, etc. Have we? Sick, evil people don't give two s about the justice system.

Much better question and much better topic than the blame game.

[da_suns_fan]

So you don't think people could get guns if they were illegal?

Now I know getting your hands on something illegal is impossible.

Of course you can.

But its A LOT harder than just driving to Bass Pro Shop.

[silverblk mystix]

You started right in with the insults again (cue "you did it first" whining).

you and your thin skin. Stop making this thread about you.

You just defined how butthurt you are.

I can move on anytime. Let me know when you can too.

Oh yeah, and anyone can go back a few pages and see that it was you who hurled the mustang insult.

[ChumpDumper]

You just defined how butthurt you are.

I can move on anytime. Let me know when you can too.

Stop making this thread about you.

[Clipper Nation]

The point should be to deter another Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, etc. Have we? Sick, evil people don't give two s about the justice system.

If they don't give two s about getting caught now, why would they give two s about getting caught if all guns were banned? Banning guns doesn't fix murderers' insane minds and only serves to punish responsible adults and limit law-abiding citizens' ability to defend themselves, tbh.....

[WeNeedLength]

So you don't think people could get guns if they were illegal?

Now I know getting your hands on something illegal is impossible.

This. If someone wants to kill a massive amount of people, THEY WILL. It doesn't matter the means to do so. If you want to argue percentages on whether a bomb would kill more or less people or be more or less effective - then you are ing stupid.

[silverblk mystix]

Stop making this thread about you.

Stop making it about you- you began the insults when I voiced a very reasonable opinion.

That there are a lot of reasons for something like this to happen.

[mavs>spurs]

You anti-gun crowd people are unamerican and don't know anything about history. If there were strict gun control in 1776, we'd still be under the British crown.

[ChumpDumper]

Stop making it about you- you began the insults when I voiced a very reasonable opinion.

That there are a lot of reasons for something like this to happen.

Stop making this thread about you.

[WeNeedLength]

Of course you can.

But its A LOT harder than just driving to Bass Pro Shop.

So, instead of today - the killer might have to wait a couple more weeks to shoot up 70+ people? Solid, solid logic.

[Blake]

Not as much as it must suck for you to be asleep and unaware.

stupid assumptions and or lying.

par.

[pawe]

Im a citizen. I get a vote. I say one dude who can shoot SEVENTY different people in a couple of minutes goes beyond "right to bare arms".

Same reason we outlaw missiles, grenades, bombs etc etc etc.

I'll keep posting this answer since you keep asking the same question.

What about the rest of us who are not crazy?
I have 9 pistols, 2 rifles, a shotgun and about 25k ammo but I choose not to go to crowded places and shoot everyone.
Why should I lose my right just because a mentally unstable person chose to do wrong?

[mavs>spurs]

"A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others, for essential, particularly for military supplies."

-George Washington

[djohn2oo8]

If they don't give two s about getting caught now, why would they give two s about getting caught if all guns were banned? Banning guns doesn't fix murderers' insane minds and only serves to punish responsible adults and limit law-abiding citizens' ability to defend themselves, tbh.....

It would help. Only 17 states submit mental health information to the background check systems.

[Clipper Nation]

What about the rest of us who are not crazy?
I have 9 pistols, 2 rifles, a shotgun and about 25k ammo but I choose not to go to crowded places and shoot everyone.
Why should I lose my right just because a mentally unstable person chose to do wrong?

Because da_suns_fan has decided that the guns you legally own and use responsibly are now too lethal for you to have, and his word is final....

[Roger Freemason Jr.]

Damn man.. This honestly breaks my heart. 12 people died, for no good reason. All those people wanted to do was watch the amazing new Batman movie, highly anticipated, revered among superhero movies.

There is evil in this world. But where does that begin? Surely not at birth..

[mavs>spurs]

[da_suns_fan]

This. If someone wants to kill a massive amount of people, THEY WILL. It doesn't matter the means to do so. If you want to argue percentages on whether a bomb would kill more or less people or be more or less effective - then you are ing stupid.

Nonsense.

To gloss over the differences in usability, portability, concealibility, effectiveness, re-use etc is asinine.

Im sure this dude could have made a home-made bomb and brought it into the theater. BUt it would have been much more difficult to cause the amount of death he easily inflicted by using guns.

Especially considering he was a "rogue" and had no assistance from outside bomb-makers etc.

[Clipper Nation]

It would help. Only 17 states submit mental health information to the background check systems.

Problem: the black market doesn't have background checks, and that's where the crazies will go if all guns were to be banned....

[djohn2oo8]

Problem: the black market doesn't have background checks, and that's where the crazies will go if all guns were to be banned....

And they may indeed do that, but don't make it easy on them. It should be imperative when one buys a gun if that person has ever been ins utionalized involuntarily, or any psychological information at all.

[Clipper Nation]

And they may indeed do that, but don't make it easy on them. It should be imperative when one buys a gun if that person has ever been ins utionalized involuntarily, or any psychological information at all.

I agree... it's inexcusable that every state doesn't have these requirements, and residents of the states that don't should put pressure on their state legislators to change the laws.....

[mavs>spurs]

that's where the crazies will go if all guns were to be banned....

that will be the least of your worries considering there would be a civil war before they ever took away our 2nd amendment.

[WeNeedLength]

Nonsense.

To gloss over the differences in usability, portability, concealibility, effectiveness, re-use etc is asinine.

Im sure this dude could have made a home-made bomb and brought it into the theater. BUt it would have been much more difficult to cause the amount of death he easily inflicted by using guns.

Especially considering he was a "rogue" and had no assistance from outside bomb-makers etc.

How the can you prove that? If that is the basis of your argument.... .