The Matrix sequels ed up by focusing too much on Zion. Nobody gave a about Zion.
I'm in the minority here but I'm a huge fan of the Ocean's trilogy. Thought Ocean's Thirteen was the best of the 3.
The Matrix sequels ed up by focusing too much on Zion. Nobody gave a about Zion.
Tough, but this is probably my top 5.
Dark Knight
Man with No Name
LOTR
Toy Story
Back to the Future
Last edited by Spurtacus; 07-26-2012 at 11:13 PM.
1. Star Wars
2. Nolan's Batman (will probably surpass Star Wars, which for now keeps its spot for nostalgia reasons)
3. Back to the Future
4. The Godfather (if the third one was just good, it would be number one)
5. Toy Story
Zion was actually such a small part of what really happened, that I don't get this. Do you mean that they showed a lot of the on-goings of Zion, when their efforts were practically for ?
Basically the entire trilogy was about the Oracle breaking the "cycle" of the Matrix and "The One" by finding a way to manipulate machines, humans, and the matrix in a manner that would lead to a peaceful negotiation.
Star Wars
Dark Knight
LOTR
Evil Dead
Back to the Future
Toy Story
Well by that logic Godfather isn't a trilogy since the 3rd one came out like 15 years after the 2nd one and was an abortion compared to the 1st two.
The Scorpion King trilogy
except there's 3 Godfather movies. It's not so much the tyness of the fourth Indy movie as much as it is the fourth movie. If The Last Crusade was never made and the new ty one was the third then I'd count it as part of a trilogy
The idea that Nolan's batman films being mentioned in the same breath as Star Wars and the Godfather just shows how ing clueless Nolanites were.
You don't like Nolan. We get it. You can stop ing about him now.
How is the Hobbit going to affect the LOTR trilogy status? It'll be the 4th movie. A prequel but still a 4th movie by the same director.
It shouldn't.
The Lord of the Rings were a 3 stand alone films.
The Hobbit, while connected to the Lord of the Rings has nothing to do with the actual plot of the said trilogy.
Besides, I've read that Peter Jackson intends to make the Hobbit a trilogy also.
I think The Hobbit has as much to do with the Fellowship of the Ring as BB does to TDK.
The Sam Raimi Spiderman trilogy was also EXTREMELY successful in the last decade.
I dont see spiderman fans claiming it was the greatest movie trilogy of all time.
You Nolanites are just plain bizzare. I saw Stretch go on and on about Tom Hardy's Baine performance. His use of his eye-brows and eyes and how he "grabbed his vest" in scenes when faced with adversity.
Do you guys know how ing stupid you sound?
The Hobbit shouldn't even be a two part movie IMHO.
The Sam Raimi movies aren't as well regarded as the Nolan movies. Another stupid point by you.
da_suns_fan, goin against the grain, VC 2000 Dunk Contest reverse 360 windmill, you can't win a le with a PG as your best player goods per par etc.
1) Star Wars Trilogy -- It changed film making.
2) LOTR - Single story over three films. Jackson is probably the best ever at blending CGI with real world special effects.
3) Godfather trilogy - Would be number one except the third film was terrible. The first two are two of the top five films of all time. Its like saying "whos the best trio in the NBA?" For a while, it was "Shaq, Kobe and whoever".
Rotten-Tomatoes:
Spiderman: 89%
Spiderman 2: 93%
Spiderman 3: 63%
Batman Begins:85 %
Dark Knight: 94%
Dark Knight Rises: 87%
Rotten Tomatoes as some definitive source of the public's perception of movies
I liked Spider-man 1 and 2, but comparing that trilogy to Dark Knight is just funny.
Its an aggregator of both professional critics and users so YES!
It merely states whether people liked a movie or not. It doesn't show how much critics or fans like movies. If you want to see that, go to IMDB.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)