Several prominent political forum posters have, over recent years, said Obama and the "globalists" are plotting to take guns away from Americans so they can successfully turn America into a police state. Prominent radio talk show host Alex Jones has also warned us about this. Fortunately, his attempts to take guns away have largely failed.
Lets have a look at what has happened with guns during Obama's presidency, shall we!
Here are some facts about guns during Obama's presidency:
The links that provided this information can be found here, for those who don't believe me:
- In 2009, Obama's first year as president, 5.5 million firearms were produced, 1 million more than in 2008, and the highest total since 1986.
- In 2009, Obama signed a bill allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons into national parks, drawing criticism from the left
- Both Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co. have seen an exponential increase in share price during Obama's presidency.
- Following the Aurora shooting, requests to buy firearms ed in Colorado
http://bottomline.nbcnews.com/_news/...out-obama?lite
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...e-theater.html
In summary, since Obama took office, Gun manufacturers and retailers have flourished, the amount of guns owned by Americans has skyrocketed, gun laws in this country are looser than they have ever been with 49 states allowing a carry permit, and Obama has yet to take any action to restrict gun ownership.
So I ask this, seeing how Obama's conspiracy to get rid of gun ownership in America has not only been ineffective but has led to looser gun laws and higher gun ownership than ever before, what do you think?
Here are the 3 options that came to mind:
Option A) Do you think he's trying to lull us to sleep so he can get re-elected and then restrict gun ownership the next 4 years, but failed to do so because Alex Jones has raied awareness about the globalists' plan to take away guns?
Option B) Do you think Obama is just a completely inept moron who tried to take guns away but failed?
Option C) I'll admit, this one might be farfetched, but do you think Obama is really telling the truth when he says he plans to make no change to gun laws and is OK with gun ownership the way it currently is?
I think Option A. Tell me what you think.
Praise Alex.
but he said that one thing that one time about how white people are angry and cling to their guns because because they hate the black people and it's his calling to melt down all the guns and make braces for poor muslim kids of the inner city by raising my taxes 75%
I think he owns a lot of stock in gun and ammo companies and is making out like a bandit.
I think he is just as incompetent in taking our guns away as he is as a President.
Obama's a closet republican TBQH.....
Good point!
I think those companies are secretly owned by the government and producing dysfunctional guns so when the government invokes martial law, the resistance militia led by Alex Jones will be defeated quickly.
Praise Alex.
Or he just doesn't want to.
"conspiracy to get rid of gun ownership in America has not only been ineffective"
The conspiracy was a guns&ammo industry paranoia/scam trumpeted by their PR/marketing department, aka NRA, which was also aided and abetted in the scam by the right-wing hate media inventing other paranoid conspiracies, such as "sharia/Muslims invading, taking over America", etc, etc.
He's been pretty successful at taking away our civil liberties
Which ones did he take from you?
You suck. Stop posting.
I slapped you real good, huh, sucker?
Its clearly option A. His avoidance of the gun issue, and in fact expanding gun rights is all a ruse to get re-elected. Once safely tucked into his second term, President Obama will take away everyone's guns and give them to the terrorists he pals around with like Bill Ayers. He will then lead a left wing revolution that will consume America and turn it into Cuba. An Islamic Cuba!
He could have tried to stop the NSA/FBI/CIA/miliatarized police raping our expectations of privacy (the corps already been doing it for many years), but do you think he, or Gecko, or any President could have stopped the NatSec paranoia resulting from 9/11?
Serious people know damn well dubya and head allowed, by their organizational disinterest in terrorism and profound incompetence, 9/11 to happen, and got away with it.
Now, NOBODY wants any such disaster to happen on their watch, and that stance is well below whoever is in the WH.
Do any of you think a Pres Gecko will stop the NatSec juggernaut, or give us back our reasonable rights to privacy?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-06-2012 at 07:41 PM.
How? By making ty puns and nicknames in all your posts?
Personally, I find George Noory to be a much more compelling AM radio host. He doesn't even hold a candle to Art Bell.
Pretty much sums it up.
George Orwell warned us about this in his book 1984.
problem is there is too many stake holders that can influence an election that is too big to fail...
eg..gun lobby groups
gambing industry
wall street
not much u can try and regulate
To be honest, I'm going with Option B.
Wouldn't surprise me if he wants to take away guns, but can't do it just like he can't do anything else.
What a stupid comment.
You know, if you lived in China, you wouldn't feel oppressed on a day to day basis either...but you would be.
So your answer is none.
OK, which civil liberties has he taken away?
It wasn't a comment, it was a simple question.
I'm also curious as to what your answer to it is.
ProminentProminent radio talk show host Alex Jones
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
