Reply With Quote
All this time I thought eugenics was about naming your kid Eugene and I was against it. Now that I know it's about culling the trophies, I am all for it.
The left is constantly and persistently trying to associate the right with racist constructs of the Democrat past, from slavery (150 years ago) to Jim Crow (slightly more recent).
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." --Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood.
I could understand why such an agenda might be kept on the down low, eh?
All this time I thought eugenics was about naming your kid Eugene and I was against it. Now that I know it's about culling the trophies, I am all for it.
Then, the entire federal government and volunteer military are morally bankrupt.
Not once, in the past 12 years, has any member of Congress (with the possible exception of Ron Paul) proposed a serious piece of legislation that would stop either of the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan. Democrats had plenty of opportunity to defund either or both wars during the Bush administration.
A pretty hefty percentage of Americans, though bent by the incessant nattering of liberals (without the courage to actually do something about it), still think both wars were warranted and legitimate.
You should start a thread on it.
in 1920 probably..eh?
Dr. Virmani is keeping the torch burning.
Were yoni working to pass a cons utional amendment banning abortions, I'd take him seriously. He isn't, so he just really doesn't give that much of a -- especially after black kids are born.
The shallow level of analysis performed in this thread by Yoni in order to show a desired result is not new by any means but its still disgusting.
Just another instance where Yoni wants bigger government imposing a set of morals on everyone else.
It doesn't approach the absence of analysis inherent in believing opposition to affirmative action is a desire to return to slavery; that opposing crippling environmental regulations is a desire to return to a polluted world; that opposition to Barack Obama is racist; that standing up for cons utional rights is gay-hating, etc...
Dr. Virmani is an abortion doctor who believes he's doing the world a favor by killing black babies. Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood on the premise that controlling the black population, through abortion, is a good thing.
It's a pretty direct link, if you ask me.
Killing humans is an area the law addresses in other than moral terms.
Did they abort any babies against the parents' wishes?
The SCOTUS (and thus, the law) disagrees on what cons utes a 'human' under your premise. Abortion is legal in this country under a set of cir stances. Are you suggesting they're doing something illegal?
I haven't been present at any abortions.
Do they propagandize parents towards abortion and away from other alternatives? Yes.
Do they oppose any measure designed to give pregnant mother, seeking an abortion, some sense of the magnitude of their choice? Yes.
Are there mothers that regret having had an abortion? Yes.
Are their motivations for conducting abortions suspect? Dr. Virmani and Marget Sanger.
Do abortionists commit murder? Yes.
Two abortion clinic employees plead guilty to murder
Abortion is the only area of the law where the killing of a human being can be medical procedure or murder based only on the position of the mother -- the person in the least objective position to make that distinction.The grand jury said that a clinic co-worker of Moton's testified that a woman gave birth to a large baby at the clinic, delivering the child into a toilet. The jurors identified the newborn as "Baby D."
The jurors said the co-worker told them that the baby was moving and looked like it was swimming.
"Moton reached into the toilet, got the baby out and cut its neck," the grand jury said in its report.
West was accused of murder in the death of a 41-year-old patient, Karnamaya Mongar.
Is that a yes or a no?
I'm suggesting it should be illegal. Laws are challenged all the time and things that were once legal become illegal. That it is currently legal does not mean I should accept the practice and not oppose it.
Of course it is and I'm not because you're objectivity is non existent. Instead of taking a look at the deep rooted sociological differences and the way minorities lag behind in every catagory as a possible reason for the increased percentage of abortions you attribute it to reasoning you WANT.
Is planned parenthood the reason that blacks lag in every category as well?
One could take your argument and turn it over to the gun control crowd. I guess the argument is valid when it fits your desires.
Nobody is saying you shouldn't have your own view or set of morals. Imposing them on everyone else is where the line is crossed, IMO
Roe vs Wade leaves the decision with the citizen. yoni would rather have big bad government make that decision for them.
SCOTUS is no longer part of the government?
No, that's due to liberalism and the bigotry of low expectations. Planned Parenthood just exploits the condition.
No, they couldn't. Go ahead, make the argument.
The law imposes all sorts of views on a populace. That you continue to call it a moral issue is not any more persuasive than calling armed robbery a moral issue. Are you suggesting armed robbery should be legal because someone can make that moral argument?
You want to take the choice out of people and put it in the hands of the government. Make abortions illegal. They'll still happen. Make guns illegal, criminals will still have them. Its the same stupid lack of logic that doesn't take an indepth view of the situation but instead tries to fix things through legislation.
Oh, OK.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
