Reply With Quote
"Showing arrogant or offhand disregard; dismissive: a cavalier at ude toward the suffering of others."
Yep, I agree.
As someone was reminding me in the abortion thread, SCOTUS has determined it to be cons utional.
There are ways to reduce the margin of error and the first thing I would start with is holding prosecutors and police responsible for wrongful prosecutions.
Wouldn't have to be.
Not according to SCOTUS.
You forgot "...without due process..."
Nope, in my world -- and most everyone else's -- legitimate means sanctioned and authorized by the United States Congress and not prohibited by the stupid United Nations.
The current conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq are being continued by a Democrat and, yet, I consider them legitimate.
"Showing arrogant or offhand disregard; dismissive: a cavalier at ude toward the suffering of others."
Yep, I agree.
It's more I've just given up arguing with your irrational at ude. Oh it's okay if some innocent people dies, that's fine although they are living, breathing, thinking PEOPLE. But unborn hardly developed foetus's dead. Oh that's another story
Some religious pro-lifers make the argument that one of the aborted fetuses might have cured cancer or something.
Yeah right.
The people who get abortions mostly are:
Blacks
White liberals
Hispanics
Take away black abortion and there are 60 million blacks instead of 40 million, and the extra 20 million are probably all either sucking on the welfare teat or out committing violent crimes. You want to know why violent crime has been on a long term decline? Because we have a successful long-term policy of pre-emptive execution in place.
If these simian welfare mamas want to participate in voluntary genocide, why is that my problem?
As for the white liberals, why is it so bad that kids who would grow up to be Democratic activist offspring of frustrated feminists get killed off early. It's just that many fewer of them to kill when the revolution comes.
Margaret Sanger is alive and well.
Methinks people who are into convenience abortions don't and won't exactly make good parents either.
Hook, Line, and Sinker.
I would go one step further and posit that they wouldn't make good corn husks. (i.e. carriers)
I agree with you. However, there is nearly an endless supply of people who want to adopt babies to raise their way. Not young children, but babies.
I feel bad for older children stuck in orphanages.
So do I.
When are you going to adopt one? I won't. My kids are grown, and I want my freedom. Even if I ever considered adopting, the chances of me adopting such a kid is pretty slim.
My wife and I actually talked about it, but I'd be lying if I didn't say that it likely won't happen. What happens if the kid doesn't get along with our kids? What happens if he's too bitter from years in an orphanage? Lots of variables. Sometimes life just sucks.
You can always go foster care. It's kinda like try before you buy.
Ugh, that just sounds cynical as .
If you've thought about adopting, I'll bet you would take a newborn in a heartbeat. Am I right? Maybe a child no more than... say... about 18 months?
If my wife and I couldn't produce a child, that would've been the 2nd option.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
