Gecko: Don't Talk About My Gecko Business

[baseline bum]

WILLARD has libertarian traits?

This just solidifies that you don't know what libertarian means, you just like to call yourself that because it's a big word that makes you sound enlightened, B...

WC's definition of libertarian is forcibly tying tubes of welfare mothers like his own.

[Wild Cobra]

WC's definition of libertarian is forcibly tying tubes of welfare mothers like his own.

Liar.

Please quote where I said that.

[Wild Cobra]

WILLARD has libertarian traits?

This just solidifies that you don't know what libertarian means, you just like to call yourself that because it's a big word that makes you sound enlightened, B...

Are you saying that he doesn't have a single ideal that a libertarian would have?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Liar.

Please quote where I said that.

Are you going to make me find your posts of desiring social services being tied to reproductive rights?

Remember that's when you said it wasn't eugenics and then I point out that Francis Galton was the one who first proposed such a system. He was only the founder of the eugenics movement.

[Wild Cobra]

Are you going to make me find your posts of desiring social services being tied to reproductive rights?

Remember that's when you said it wasn't eugenics and then I point out that Francis Galton was the one who first proposed such a system. He was only the founder of the eugenics movement.

I remember the things I said well enough. There was no "forcible" in my viewpoints. You are a chronic liar, and I am tired of your pathetic ways.

[leemajors]

Watch out Fuzzy, WC is hopping mad about an unrelated matter!

[Wild Cobra]

Watch out Fuzzy, WC is hopping mad about an unrelated matter!

At least you have some common sense.

[CuckingFunt]

At least you have some common sense.

Lulz.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I remember the things I said well enough. There was no "forcible" in my viewpoints. You are a chronic liar, and I am tired of your pathetic ways.

So then you are saying you do not want to tie social services to reproductive rights?

Maybe if you were to point out specific examples of me lying your words will have some veracity.

We have gone through this before. When I say you are stupid, I point out your credence to exosphere combustion, lacking knowledge of capacitors when they are a part you change out on a daily basis, and thinking expertise means not having to look at a troubleshooting checklist anymore when changing parts.

See, specific examples.

The eugenics gem just adds to the stupidity but adds a dash of willfully ignorant amorality. You do not have to hold someone down to compel someone to do something against their will.

For example, lets say they tie reproductive rights to unemployment, AFDC, WIC, food stamps, housing subsidies, medicaid etc. Now say there is a single mother who lost their job and is unable to get work. In order to become eligible to get social services for her and her child, they require her to spay herself.

What choices does she have?

A: No home, food, or health care for her and her child. or
B: Get spayed.

No one is forcing her?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Watch out Fuzzy, WC is hopping mad about an unrelated matter!

[Wild Cobra]

So then you are saying you do not want to tie social services to reproductive rights?

Maybe if you were to point out specific examples of me lying your words will have some veracity.

We have gone through this before. When I say you are stupid, I point out your credence to exosphere combustion, lacking knowledge of capacitors when they are a part you change out on a daily basis, and thinking expertise means not having to look at a troubleshooting checklist anymore when changing parts.

See, specific examples.

The eugenics gem just adds to the stupidity but adds a dash of willfully ignorant amorality. You do not have to hold someone down to compel someone to do something against their will.

For example, lets say they tie reproductive rights to unemployment, AFDC, WIC, food stamps, housing subsidies, medicaid etc. Now say there is a single mother who lost their job and is unable to get work. In order to become eligible to get social services for her and her child, they require her to spay herself.

What choices does she have?

A: No home, food, or health care for her and her child. or
B: Get spayed.

No one is forcing her?

Like a true ankle biter, you just don't let go. Someone needs to kick you.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Like a true ankle biter, you just don't let go. Someone needs to kick you.

You can characterize my statements however you like.

They are either compelling commentary on your stupidity and amoral positions or they are not.

At the end of the day, neither of us are the judge of that. By now you should realize that most of the time I do not write this stuff for you. When people start getting into it with you I want people to remember the context of what you are about.

That's why in the Martin threads I recall the racist you spouted with specifics. I wanted Trill, clam, push et al to see exactly what you are about.

Same thing here. I didn't want bb's comment simply brushed under the rug and you posturing that it was just an exaggeration. You in fact do support policies tying reproductive rights to means based social services.

So you go ahead and call me an ankle biter or whatever but just think to yourself: what is everyone else going to think in relation to you?

I'm giving empirical examples. Do you think they are going to think that claims of you being racist and supporting eugenics are unfair?

The specific examples are laid out and you do not deny them. I don't really have to spell out what the combination of the two speaks of do I?