New Franchise. Nash or Stockton

[whitemamba]

all this stockton talk got me thinking, you have a new franchise who would you take steve nash or stockton..


discuss.

[pass1st]

If it's today's NBA, Nash. Stockton wouldn't get away with a lot of the he pulled

[whitemamba]

If it's today's NBA, Nash. Stockton wouldn't get away with a lot of the he pulled

i believe nash makes the entire team better, to as where stockton just ran PnR with malone, and malone made him look good. u would never hear of any other jazz players during that era

[Latarian Milton]

at least stockton is a solid defender imo

[pass1st]

He sure can take a hit, though. Nash would be out of it if he got hit like that

[namlook]

That's very close. Stockton the better defender, Nash the better shooter. Pretty much a tossup.

[whitemamba]

nash is more of a threat i feel, better overall PG

[shyne]

I'll take Stockton, he was a ruthless son of a . I like Nash, but when in crunch time I want the tougher player.

[Darth_Pelican]

Prime Nash was a 2 time NBA MVP. I'll take him tbh.

[Koolaid_Man]

Prime Nash was a 2 time NBA MVP. I'll take him tbh.

Puhlease he got those MVP's based on his skin color..we all know it..Great White Hype

[irishock]

3 straight white MVPs from '05-07,

[dirk4mvp]

Puhlease he got those MVP's based on his skin color..we all know it..Great White Hype

really? what's the percentage of mvps that are white, es?

[DMC]

Puhlease he got those MVP's based on his skin color..we all know it..Great White Hype

White on white crime imo

[Brazil]

Stockton tbh, he was playing both side of the floor, was a tough mother er and clutch

[DMC]

building your team around a PG

/DoK

[Kai]

Nash all the way.

[Brazil]

Nash all the way.

why? you didn't see Stockton play ?

[stretch]

I'll take Nash.

Stockton was a better defender, but Nash is better at basically everything else, whether its ball handling, shooting, passing, footwork, getting teammates involved, etc... Nash is arguably the best offensive player (not scorer) in the history of basketball.

[whitemamba]

I'll take Nash.

Stockton was a better defender, but Nash is better at basically everything else, whether its ball handling, shooting, passing, footwork, getting teammates involved, etc... Nash is arguably the best offensive player (not scorer) in the history of basketball.

quite a bold statement..

[lmbebo]

Very bold statement.

I would probably choose Stockton myself. Stockton played in a very structured offense while Nash had his best years running free and controlling everything. They're both solid shooters, Nash is probably better.

Stockton played defense and one of the top all time in steals as well (maybe #1?, can't remember).

[Venti Quattro]

stockton because he's a dirty mother er who will do everything to win.

[baseline bum]

Stockton, cuz I want some nasty on my team.

[Clipper Nation]

Chris Paul, tbh...

[DMC]

lol three great PG (Nash, Stockton, Paul) all with one thing in common: 0 rings.

[baseline bum]

lol three great PG (Nash, Stockton, Paul) all with one thing in common: 0 rings.

They also all played with grossly overrated PFs.