obese ugly whale gf
A 28 year woman old decides to pork 5 18 year old males. I don't condone her doing this, but even her husband is forgiving. WTF is prison supposed to do here?! Why is there even a trial? So her employer wishes to fire her over this. So be it. Prison, for that matter media has no place in this charade.
Otherwise move on!
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs...opstories.html
In part:
Colleps' husband, Christopher, is sticking by his wife despite the accusations.
"If you know Brittni, you know she's an empathetic loving, loyal person. Brittni is a loving mother and continuously puts the needs of our children above her own," Christopher Colleps said before the trial began.
obese ugly whale gf
lolTexas
20 years is wayyy out of the scope of fair and adequate in this situation. Yeah, she should lose her job and not be able to teach again, but this is putting the dime on the taxpayer's bill to incarcerate her.
army wives
service before self = getting cuckolded
cuckolded indeed
Dude even supported her after she had 4 pair of balls slammin' all over his wife
Wonder if the prosecutor's office put that in rewind mode and fapped to it.
Exactly. Put those self righteous aholes on trial.
As to the husband, naw i wouldn't auto conclude he's cucked. Maybe he partakes a plenty also and is not your sterotypical hypocritical "okay for me but not for you" jerkoff.
what a spineless cuckold![]()
Doesn't anyone here see why a conviction is the proper thing to do?
She lost her job. She has it on her record preventing her from getting another. They were all 18, meaning adults and legal. Kids are ing in middle school and knew what they were doing. There are other people committing worse acts then giving into natural temptations that need to be behind bars. Punish the kids by making them take summer school for the credit if the grades don't match up and are in question. This doesn't need to go as far as it has. The school could've taken care of this on their own. Conviction is idiotic.
No it's not. Yes they were of age, but they were students and she was a teacher. She is in a position of power over them. It's the same thing that makes sexual harassment at work an offense that can go into court. true sexual harassment is not between coworkers, but between a boss end an employee. Consensual or not, that makes the difference. You may not like the laws of the state, county, or what ever laws were used, but that's too bad.
If it's a law then it must be right.
There's no money involved. Fail the students in that class. Fire the teacher. Save the court costs for something that means something. Common sense.
Boy, was she loving.
Have you ever read the tenth amendment?
Speaking of boy, she looks like one.
In some states it is perfectly legal for a teacher to have sex with a student as long as the student is of the age of consent and it is consensual. Actually, it was that way in Texas until about 10 years ago.
From March 2012:
The Arkansas Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the state's law banning sexual contact between teachers and students, finding that people 18 or older have a cons utional right to engage in a consensual sexual relationship.
The court sided with 38-year-old David Paschal, an Elkins High School history and psychology teacher who admitted having a five-month consensual sexual relationship with an 18-year-old student ... the high court found the law was uncons utional because it criminalized sexual conduct between consenting adults.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz23ocEODwz
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz23obsBxRX
Don't know how much time the prosecution would actually be seeking but the idea that she could land 20 years for a nonviolent crime is insane. With that said, I have no problem with the law making it illegal.
Why not make it illegal for a boss to his secretary in that case?
If the boss is in a position to his secretary because the state funnels a constant supply of impressionable young people who have been conditioned for more than a decade to trust and obey him, sure.
These debates almost always include some discussion of how 18 is at best an arbitrary number. There are kids out there that are mature enough at 15 or 16 to make these decisions. There are kids out there at 18 or 19 that are still so sheltered and immature that their judgment in such matters are questionable at best. Teachers have a unique opportunity to recognize such kids and possibly nurture or exploit them. If you're going to be given the keys to a system where there is so much potential for abuse then you have to be ready to be held to a higher standard, which means heavier consequences for crossing the line.
That becomes the basis for having tough laws on these issues. When one person hold power over another, the one with the power can demand sexual favors, or lose one's job, or get bad grades. Sure, it's not cut and dry, but the laws designed with this idea ore to protect people from these compromising positions. Laws are not always right or wrong, but they are the law.
What would your beautiful wife, who is a high earning secretary do if her boss proposed sexual favors or be fired?
She'd grab her rifle and go shoot Mexicans at the border, I believe.
It's ing stupid. The President ed his subordinate with a cigar, he didn't get prison time.
You don't videotape yourself being put in a compromising position to show off to your friends. If you bragged about it, you weren't a victim. This country needs an enema.
I do. The law has no business governing relationships between consensual adults, without regards to job le. Workplaces can set policy, but job le should not be the deciding factor in a consensual relationship.
If she's demanding sex under threat of failing students, there are laws on the books that prosecute that crime. It's called blackmail and extortion.
What are the laws in DC?
I'll bet the age of consent there is still 16 years also.
They love their interns.
Do you want all national laws, or do you believe in the 10th amendment?
Bull law. If this had taken place a month later after they graduated, would it still have been illegal?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)