Reply With Quote
I wonder if this surprises anyone?
They get Obama to help in Libya, and this shows who they are.
Was Gaddafi that bad? I think not.
Those moderate Muslims are at it again. Obama's buddies.
Arab Spring run amok: 'Brotherhood' starts crucifixions
The Arab Spring takeover of Egypt by the Muslim Brotherhood has run amok, with reports from several different media agencies that the radical Muslims have begun crucifying opponents of newly installed President Mohammed Morsi.
Middle East media confirm that during a recent rampage, Muslim Brotherhood operatives, “crucified those opposing Egyptian President Muhammad Morsi naked on trees in front of the presidential palace while abusing others.”
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/arab-spri...-crucifixions/
I wonder if this surprises anyone?
They get Obama to help in Libya, and this shows who they are.
Was Gaddafi that bad? I think not.
Funny how there is not a news outlet ANYWHERE that is reporting this other than the christian nutjob news and random unverifiable blogs.
Not reuters, UPI, AP, Fox News, CNN, the three major TV newtorks, CSM, yahoo, aljazeera.
Last edited by FuzzyLumpkins; 08-17-2012 at 11:28 PM.
lol wnd
Why would the ABF style news networks on their man?
Looks like democracy isn't working for Egypt... Good thing it's not our problem.
Yep...
The Obama administration helps make the crisis occur, then runs with a tucked tail.
So now you want to do...what?
Uh? Egyptians finally got rid of their dictator, voted, and now what they do is their problem.
Stop giving them moral support. If it was my choice, I would have never helped incite the changes in the past like the Obama administration did. He exchange one bad leader for a government that will be worse. Same with Libya.
Nothing I can do but say "see I told you so."
Just like you did with Iraq, right?
lol moral support
Does Iraq have a worse or better government?
So you're against nation building unless you're for it.
Iraq has a government? I thought it was just a free-for-all over there.
Yes, I'm against nation building, but if we have cause to take out a leader, then it is our responsibility to the people to do our best to restore a country for them.
We did not go there with nation building as the primary mission. That was a collateral result.
So you're for it.
So we had cause for taking out Saddam but not for Gaddafi?
Alrighty then.
Does it hurt?
My God.
Would it be better to leave a nation in shambles after we go to war?
We didn't say a damn word on Egypt until it was obvious that Hosni Mubarak was on the way out. There is nothing we could have done to stop his ouster unless we allowed him to pull a Bashar Al-Assad on his own people, and then you would just wind up with another country in a civil war and a generation of new terrorists.
Why aren't wingnuts more vocally supporting Al-Assad in Syria? That's exactly what they wanted in Libya...
muslim brotherhood replacing govts with dumb s
seems like teachings of lenon communists....
So you're against warmongering and nation-building unless you're for it... no wonder you're voting for Willard tbh....
BTW, this is why we need to stop meddling in the Middle East (or anywhere else really), tbh.... after decades of expensive American warmongering, this still goes on..... maybe it's just time to accept that there's nothing we can do to eliminate the crazies and get the out for good....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
