Reply With Quote
Daily Caller.
How much money do you want to put on it? I'll give you 10:1 odds.
In other news, the Bobcats will the NBA Finals in 2013.
Looks like the latest gallop poll has Obama by minus 2!
I read that linked article and others that expanded more on McKeon's poll. I wouldn't dismiss it so readily.
lol boutons you post that as if it's some sort of good thing that Obama is going to win. the united states should just go ahead and split up. the partisan divide is at an all time high, i think everyone would be happier if they were allowed to govern themselves.
Ignorant s want Repugs to win, forgetting what a pile of continuing dog 2001-2008 was.
Gecko/Ryan are very clear about how they want to up America, and that's just what they're telling us (Repugs in 2000 never told us their priorit was invading Iraq for oil)
Obama has shown how he wants to america up through actions tbh. His "vision" for America and the traditional patriotic vision are complete polar opposites. The south and the north should just go ahead and divide again along civil war lines. All these years later and the divide is still there and it's just as big as it was before the war. That way each side could get more accomplished and congress wouldn't be constantly split.
Obama is doing the same Bush did. He wants to do nation building in Syria just like Bush wanted to do nation building in Iraq.
Obama, Romney, and Bush are the same person. Wake the up.
Obama voted AGAINST the Iraq war for oil, and got called a traitor, foreigner, anti-American for it.
There is momentum where the out-of-control MIC, once it has its war(s) and imperial murdering rackets get going, hides behind "national security" and will trash anybody as traitor and unAmerican.
I predicted in the dubya/ head Reign of Error that their and disasters would continue for decades. So far I'm right.
And Gecko/Ryan, with lots of neo-con oil warriors in key campaign roles, will certainly continue much more actively than Obama to support and enhance the MIC.
We have a similar "Repug" in charge now, he just has a D next to his name, tbh..... of course, partisan hacks such as yourself (and Yoni and DarrinS for that matter) only care about warmongering, money-printing, and erosion of civil liberties when the other party is doing it....
Do you live under a rock? Republicans and Democrats alike were pushing for a war in Iraq as early as 1997, tbh...
I know PNAC was pushing Clinton to invade Iraq (Clinton was correctly worried about OBL, whom the Repugs ignored until 9/11), but dubya/ head didn't campaign on it in 2000.
What Dems were pushing publicly to invade Iraq?
157 Democrats voted for the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, for starters.... by 2002, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards were among the many influential Democrats supporting the Iraq war....
"The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[1][2] It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government."
That's not a declaration of war and invasion.
Along with other Repug lies in 2001-2003, it was bogusly cited as justification for invasion.
the tiebreaker still lies on them swing states since you can never embezzle many states from the opposing gang, gonna be thrilled to steal a hardcore democrat/republican state when its not traditionally your hood tbh
We haven't declared a war cons utionally since WWII, dumbass....
at least bush did all his gangsta stuffs with honesty & reality which the kenyan n!gger never gets a pinch of. america been in decline for quite a while now and it didn't start in bush or obama's administration, but clinton's when ty policies were made and immigrants allowed to move in uncontrollably
thank the policy makers in DC for ing up this country tbh
What makes up a cons utional declaration?We haven't declared a war cons utionally since WWII, dumbass....
I mean, is there some specific form that must be signed?
According to the Cons ution, the power to declare war is expressly delegated to Congress only..... merely voting to transfer the formal declaration power to the President as Congress does nowadays is uncons utional because the executive branch is not supposed to have that power to begin with.... Congress has to draft and approve a formal declaration of war, or else it's an undeclared war....
Where does it say congress cannot delegate?
Where does it say the declaration has to be a formal draft?
Where does it say the wards "declare war" must be used?
Please...I mean, is there some specific form that must be signed?
What's the form number. I want to look it up.
I would like you to quote the cons utional passages that make the Iraqi war uncons utional please.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
