Reply With Quote
I think, therefore it is.
silly me. I'll go sit in the corner now.
I think, therefore it is.
getting too deep in here for me
Apparently the government exposed themselves by doing to him exactly what he was talking about. lol
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...Facebook-Posts
Know what you're talking about for a change before you add your snarky remarks. Add some substance for once. Thanks.
In any case a circuit judge has found that there was no plausible reason to have detained Raub.
"The pe ion is so devoid of any factual allegations that it could not be reasonably expected to give rise to a case or controversy," reads a signed statement by Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharrett, which was provided to the Richmond Times-Dispatch Thursday afternoon.
Judge Sharrett adds that he was shocked to find that a magistrate did not include any grounds at all for holding Raub, who was placed in custody for a full week without any charges being pressed.
And the fact that the government felt that they had any right to do so gives, if nothing else, credence to at least some of Raub's claims.
"Brandon Raub was arrested with no warning, targeted for doing nothing more than speaking out against the government, detained against his will, and isolated from his family, friends and attorneys," Whitehead said. "These are the kinds of things that take place in totalitarian societies. Today, at least, Judge Allan Sharrett proved that justice can still prevail in America."
one guy is saying gets locked up but havnt proven , wheres the evidence
while the other guy who brings both the table exposing every fkn govt in the world....is hiding in an embassy...
assange hide and seek new participant...
Welcome to Obamanation.
Red blooded Americans like you don't know about American history. This is the culmination of a process that began well before Obama. Turning point was the New Deal -- about seventy five years ago -- but it started going seriously downhill in 2001. The bureaucratic management of everyday life didn't start in 2008.
do you like sloppy seconds? cause, that's what you added to the thread.
@WC: argument could be made that scientific/bureaucratic steering goes back to TR and the progressive Republicans.
Obama is the cherry on top. You guys need to quit pretending he's the whole sundae.
and by you guys, I mean posters like you who plant the banner of patriotism in the rich soil of their own prejudice.
sloppy seconds? cause, that's what you added to the thread.
Not really, but if that makes you feel better to believe that..
your post repeated things already said. added nothing except a silly gif.
It added truth in a different way. Instead of being insecure and trying to amuse people, just move along with the convo. No need to be a jerk.
You should take your own advice for once. Thanks.
I did, somehow you missed it. Goodbye
you reposted something already posted upstream. somehow you missed it. bye now.
No I didn't miss it, I just reiterated and pointed something out since you didn't get it.
But anyhow, no time to go back and forth with a troll.
that's a distinction without a difference. reiterating something is exactly the same as reposting it. you reposted something which, word for word, had already been posted.
thanks for playing.
That's not exactly true, and I noted that I pointed something out that you clearly didn't understand from it, which you yourself even said you didn't understand lol. Of course you missed that.
Either way, you seem to be a very insecure person as well as CF, that you both feel you need to make things a game. You keep trying to win something as if you have something to lose or already lost something. I'd recommend getting a bit of help. Seeing as how you aren't really advancing the topic or any real subject matter, I'm pretty much feeling like your next ignorant remark will just put you on my ignore list next to Dumpster. Thanks.
what a complete pussy
Well duh! Everybody knows it started January 20, 2009.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
