Reply With Quote
it certainly isn't going to change in favour of spurs this season
sons the stats and the facts don't lie. I only drop truth bombs with no bias whatsoever. I have to admit I didn't realize just how dominate the Spurs have been against other teams during the regular season. only a few teams even come close to the .500 mark....
43-36 vs Atlanta Hawks
41-38 vs Boston Celtics
60-19 vs Brooklyn/NJ Nets
13-2 vs Charlotte Bobcats
46-29 vs Chicago Bulls
52-29 vs Cleveland Cavaliers
88-64 vs Dallas Mavericks
99-62 vs Denver Nuggets
48-30 vs Detroit Pistons
95-50 vs Golden State Warriors
94-75 vs Houston Rockets
45-34 vs Indiana Pacers
72-74 vs Los Angeles Lakers (guaranteed fact the officials helped Lakers win at least 10 games)
115-30 vs Los Angeles Clippers (lolz)
51-16 vs Memphis Grizzlies
34-15 vs Miami Heat
39-36 vs Milwaukee Bucks (wow surprisingly close)
69-25 vs Minnesota Timberwolves
45-20 vs New Orleans Hornets
45-34 vs New York Knicks
82-63 vs Oklahoma City Thunder
32-15 vs Orlando Magic
47-34 vs Philadelphia 76ers
75-72 vs Phoenix Suns
73-72 vs Portland Trail Blazers (wow another surprise)
99-54 vs Sacramento Kings
23-9 vs Toronto Raptors
90-73 vs Utah Jazz
49-30 vs Washington Wizards
http://nbauniverse.com/head_to_head/spurs_rivals.htm
it certainly isn't going to change in favour of spurs this season
The damn Bucks having been killing SA ever since the Big Dog days
Lakers are 7-8 against the Bobcats
im sure those records have really been padded over the last decade or so
BRhornet
What's the Hornets' all-time record vs the NBA?
God bless
Suns are surprisingly close, Mavs are a surprise to suck (although that may be because of the 90's).
Barkley owned the Spurs in the 90's.
Spurs beat them (Lakers) good in the regular season. They returned the favor in the post season though.
Not a huge surprise if you're a Spurs fan. SA is second in all time win percentage in NBA history.
Spurs haven't done in over five years tbh, and even then they played the weakest WCF and Finals teams ever
LOL '09 Nuggets and '04 TWolves with both PGs injured were such amazing foes.Spurs haven't done in over five years tbh, and even then they played the weakest WCF and Finals teams ever
regular season is the spurs season
yay for regular season..
No one can deny the Spurs are regular season and Finals bests (when they make it).
When I first started watching ball (rarly to mid 80's) even thoughthe Spurs were far from Finals contenders, the old Alamo or Hemisphere whatever the eff they called those old buildings... were murder to play in. Although they can ,(I know Lakers fans are self-en led even more arrogant assholes) be some sanctimonous, classier and holier than though prickstheir fans have supported any decent team they have had. And I lived there for 3 years the spurs ARE San Antonio. Sure there are cowboys country and there are plenty of Saint fan refugees ...but the spurs are the fabric of that city. I agree the Duncan/Pop Spurs have inflated those numbers San Antonio was rarely an automatic w like the Clips used to be ...
They did for a while, since 03 though the Spurs have swept them in the regular season several times. I hated playin them though
Bucks no matter how bad though always seem to be a team that can split with you (Last year they won the only matchup lol).
I guess we should give props to the Bucks, Blazers, and Suns for being so legit.
Bucks is really surprising tbh. Suns and Blazers I can understand since they're usually pretty decent (at least they've had multiple excellent runs each), but the Bucks? Crazy. . .Spurs just need to step it up against them. Bucks haven't been very good very often. I literally can't think of a single really good Bucks team and I've been watching NBA since I was 5 in 1990.
Agreed, and that's literally "one game difference". Spurs win 1 of those 74 they lost and it would've been tied. Too bad the NBA is so blantant in helping their league-preferred teams defeat rivals. I watch all 4 major sports, and the NBA is the only one I feel that does it.72-74 vs Los Angeles Lakers (guaranteed fact the officials helped Lakers win at least 10 games)
Oh well, it's not that big of a gap anyway, considering the Lakers' annual spending is roughly double what the Spurs' is after calculating for luxury tax.
unbiased
Facts
truuf bombs
Killa, BR is always money on them truth bombs. Can't hate BR on that.
Son when did your ban get lifted? I thought it was until the start of regular season.
BR
You havent answered yet
When it counts.... not so close.
Playoffs:
Lakers 34 Spurs 18
playoffs:
Celtics : 43
Lakers : 31
Yep! No doubt about it. Our nemesis. But I will take a .415% over a .349 any day.playoffs:
Celtics : 43
Lakers : 31
Especially when we are about to tie and surpass them in the LOB category of which the Spurs have NO CHANCE of doing to the lakers in our lifetimes.
But good point. It's why we hate the Celtics almost as much as you guys hate the Lakers.
Ban? When was I banned?
Did I miss something?
Yeah, that 2001 Sixers team was sure an elite team.Spurs haven't done in over five years tbh, and even then they played the weakest WCF and Finals teams ever
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
