Reply With Quote
Question for mouse: which conspiracy theory is stronger, creationism or controlled implosion of the WTC?
Intelligent Design is not the best answer. It is not an answer at all.
"We don't know what happened, so X did it."
Question for mouse: which conspiracy theory is stronger, creationism or controlled implosion of the WTC?
Not anything because a whole lot of things can be disproven. But God? Not possible. No matter how much evidence you have. I could say this whole universe is proof of his existence, evolution included. What do you expect though? A carving on a mountain face that says "God made this. -100,000,000,000"? That's why I say these topics are just a waste of your energy because no one has the definitive answer.
Besides, what's the alternative? Believing you are nothing. Take the positive route if anything. It's better for you.
I'm not really posting this to argue with mouse since he's a re ,
Your weak mind just can't post an opinion you feel the need to insult people.
Another frustrated Athiest with a short fuse.
Last edited by mouse; 08-31-2012 at 08:51 PM.
You didn't answer my question son.
Why do you need to believe in fairy tales for validation? That's kind of sad.
And do you believe in the tooth fairy? It can't be disproven.
That is a loaded question Creationism is a theory / religion WTC is a fact the video evidence shows it to be.
So you're saying the WTC conspiracy theory is more credible.
I don't need to believe in "fairy tales". I believe in my experiences.
Tooth fairy? Come on. Are you going to ask me if I believe in toys coming alive like in Toy Story? The ers just seem to know when were coming ahead of time. Can't ever seem to catch them!
lol ”science” was asked.....
"intelligent design"
The only reason people came up with "intelligent design" was because it at least had a prayer in court of being taught in public schools and sounded less re ed than creationism.
It was this re ed book that was originally written as a creationist text that created the term intelligent design. It was subs uted token for token for 'creationism' from the earlier versions since creationism was no longer allowed to be taught in public schools.
The only reason people came up with "intelligent design" was because it at least had a prayer in court of being taught in public schools and sounded less re ed than creationism.
That word for word subs ution is one of the main reasons the ID garbage got shredded in court in Dover, PA.
Apparently, you do, because you think one needs to in order for their life to have meaning.
You can't prove that they don't come alive when nobody is watching.Tooth fairy? Come on. Are you going to ask me if I believe in toys coming alive like in Toy Story? The ers just seem to know when were coming ahead of time. Can't ever seem to catch them!
See how that works?
No
WTC7 is still being exzamined and since I don't have access to any of the steel beams or debri I am goiing to wait for testing to be completed.
Do you know the meaning of 'theory' in scientific terms?
I didn't say that. I said the alternative was thinking you'll cease to exist when you die.
I can prove that toys are just plastic and doesn't have life. Simple. Definitive.
How is that book any different than this book?It was this re ed book that was originally written as a creationist text that created the term intelligent design. It was subs uted token for token for 'creationism' from the earlier versions since creationism was no longer allowed to be taught in public schools.
That word for word subs ution is one of the main reasons the ID garbage got shredded in court in Dover, PA.
Last edited by mouse; 08-31-2012 at 09:16 PM.
You claimed that the alternative to believing in magic sky daddy was "believing that you're nothing". That's really sad if that's your only way of seeing meaning in life.
You can't prove that toys aren't magic and can come to life. You also can't disprove that the tooth fairy exists. Or Zeus, Odin, Ra, etc. Why don't you believe in them?I can prove that toys are just plastic and doesn't have life. Simple. Definitive.
It's a cute way of saying we don't have all the facts.
Neither does evolution.
You don't get it, do you. ID does not leave out evolution. It does not say evolution doesn't happen. It takes evolution as a tool, and builds changes faster than nature can alone.
"Neither does evolution" is not a proper response to anything you quoted.
Now you know why I created "alternative" design.
Last edited by mouse; 08-31-2012 at 10:01 PM.
That is the alternative. Just a spec that was. If I'm wrong , give me your other alternatives if you don't believe death is not the end.
So why don't you believe in the toothfairy then? Or if toys are indeed magic nd can come to life?
Where is the missing link? I hear this all the time, where? At which stage? The link is pretty ing straight forward from erectus to sapien.
You are basically saying that your life is meaningless without a fairy tale. You are saying that you cannot give your own life a sense of purpose. You need other people to tell you what to live for.
Again, that's kind of sad.
I'm not re ed, so I won't believe in something "because it can't be disproven." Lots of things can't be disproven. That's never a reason for believing in something.So why don't you believe in the toothfairy then? Or if toys are indeed magic nd can come to life?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
