Reply With Quote
There is also more than one "mayan calandar". Others found in other cities to not arbitrarily end in 2012.
The fundamental question is whether your claim about the existance of a God is proven.
The fundamental question about the existance of Bigfoot is whether it has been proven.
The logical rejection of something until it has been proven to exist does not require any faith at all.
That is simply the default position, not any kind of faith.
There is also more than one "mayan calandar". Others found in other cities to not arbitrarily end in 2012.
I do know this, the last thing I'd want in my foxhole with the bad guys closing it and it's over are a bunch of atheists. They'd be screaming like a bunch of little es.
ah crap.. wrong thread.
So why do you do just that on so many other topics?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I thought Science knows exactly what happened 12 billion years ago it's in the text books.
If the info in this thread is accurate, then atheists are too smart to be in a fox hole with dumb s like you.
Why are you always so bitter towards science?
Did some science thugs beat on you when you were a kid? Hold you down in the sun and put a magnifying glass over your balls? Pour some lab chemicals in the toilet before giving you a swirly?
sharing your story might do you some good, tbh
One of my favorite quotes is the one by Einstein that goes "Religion without science is blind, science without religion is lame".
He was a pretty smart guy. So were the hundreds of theist scientists that are dead and the ones that are still alive.
This is a funny thread because it divides people, which is one of the things that many atheists claim they despise about religion.
I've never heard any atheist make that claim
That's because you hear what you want to hear. You proved this in the thread you started about being a cuckhold. In that thread, you said you should have picked up on the fact that she was cuckholding you, but you didn't. You didn't because you hear only what you want to hear.
That is true if Blake would read my comments he would know I love Science.
I always said Science is cool mixing baking soda with vinegar trying to create an artificial liver all that is great.
It's when Science tell us we evolved from an ape and there is no such thing as creation or intelligent design. That's not science that's agenda driven religion.
name one atheist that's made that claim.
Source and exact quote.
you proved in this quote you're ignorant.You proved this in the thread you started about being a cuckhold. In that thread, you said you should have picked up on the fact that she was cuckholding you, but you didn't. You didn't because you hear only what you want to hear.
That's not science
ID is not science. You don't know what science is.It's when Science tell us we evolved from an ape and there is no such thing as creation or intelligent design. That's not science that's agenda driven religion.
Creating an artificial liver is not medical science?
So when scientist create a seedless tomato that is purple inside and taste like passion fruit that is not intelligent design?ID is not science.
Or when they create a human ear on the back of a lab rat that is not intelligent science?
You don't know what science is.
I know what it's not and when it tries to bull us into thinking we evolved from a snail.
Why does questioning science mean that you don't believe in science? A lot of people question God but that doesn't equate disbelief.
I've heard many atheists say this. I've heard many leftists say this vs. the right.
If you ever want to actually feel cognitive dissonance pour out of somebody bring up race and IQ scores.
When someone claims they found a flaw in the bible the whole concept of creation is a lie.
When science claims asbestos is good for you and later we find out it's a lie the excuse is science is always reviving itself and making changes that's what science is all about.
Talk about unfair bias.
Are you claiming that scientists were purposefully providing false information to people by claiming that asbestos was good for them? I don't even know if what you claim is true or not, but I'll assume that it is for the sake of the question.
At one time doctors used to claim cigarette were good for you and would willing be part of the advertisement
You see doctors and scientists can lie and say well that is what we knew back then and get a pass. The bible thumpers can't afford to up just once or they lose all credibillity.
Does that sound rational to you?
The most misearable people I know are atheists.
I think there is also a study proving that.
Avante fails on every level when he tries to discuss religion. I haven't seem a single compelling point from him on this matter.
Show me one compelling point that anyone has made talking religion. That is a challenge, go ahead prove your point. I want to see a compelling point. Show me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
