Republicans are THE biggest voter fraudsters, tbh..... the vote-flipping during the primaries and the rigged voice vote and disenfranchising of Paul delegates at the RNC prove it.....
Republican crocodile tears about non-existant voter fraud have suckered a lot of people into thinking they give a about it.
The reality is that the only problem voter ID laws are really intended to solve is that some groups targeted by these laws tend to vote for Democrats.
All you have to do to peek behind the mountain of bull concerns about voter fraud, is look at what they tell each other when they are talking to each other, and not trying to trick independents into thinking it is a good idea:
When asked about whether ANY election in his state was EVER materially affected by voter fraud... he backpedaled faster than a unicyclist at a cliff's edge, and completely dodged, and continues to dodge, commenting on it.
18 seconds of truth. That's all it takes to show this cynical Republican bull for what it is.
Republicans are THE biggest voter fraudsters, tbh..... the vote-flipping during the primaries and the rigged voice vote and disenfranchising of Paul delegates at the RNC prove it.....
I have given serious thought about it ever since the left accused the electronic voting machines of being rigged by republicans. Then it turns out Bush wins in Ohio in 2004 and has three voting systems. A clear win on both the other two voting systems that have been in place for years, and a clear win on the electronic systems for Kerry. Looks like someone rigged these machines for democrats!
Now keep inn ind this did all start with the liberals conspiracy theory.
![]()
OMFG... you need to get this to a prosecutor right away!!
What no comment?
Republicans are so righteous the only way they can possibily lose is if the other side is cheating?
you going for that bull ?
Should have just said the mafia.
Suppression..
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202992
Wow...
You are acting the impatient child...
Do you know what work is? I just got off work an hour ago. That posting was soon before I left for work.
Please tell me that you don't expect Spurstalk to be more important than work. maybe it is for you, but not for me.
Yes and no. A few election cycles ago there was obvious cheating in the state of Washington to get a democrat governor elected. The chart I posted actually came from a democrat pundit trying to show republican cheating, but I think it backfired on him.
On the issue of "possibly cheating." Voting is a sacred right of citizens, and we need to do what is possibly to insure cheating does not take place, but people on either side. The only reason i see for democrats to resist such uncomplicated measures is because they believe they cannot win without cheating.
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 09-07-2012 at 02:51 AM.
lol obvious cheating
You didn't see our local news accounts.
Let me guess. Some guy made an accusation and didn't back it up, and some other guy countered with another accusation he didn't back up.
No charges were filed.
No arrests were made.
No fraud was proved.
Am I close?
It is difficult to prove eye witness accounts when it becomes a he said she said situation. However, the accusers word made sense completely.
And the person you believe was accusing Democrats.
writes itself tbh.
I'm done with you on this topic Chump. Too much happened long enough ago, I cannot give you an accurate account, and it would be a long one. Besides, you not seeing the same news I did since it was a local Northwest event, just means it would be even harder to relay to you. You have probably seen no news, or very limited on the topic.
No need. I already described it perfectly.
You're an easy read, WC.
I was going to post something snarky about how voter ID suppresses the four key Democratic cons uencies of dead people, imaginary people, felons, and people trying to vote multiple times...
but since I don't believe in democracy or voting anyway it wouldn't make much sense to fight on that hill.
Under my plan, most minorities would be better off and would receive extensive benefits funded by confiscation of wealth from the enemies of the state.
Texas has a long and well do ented history of voter fraud. , it's what got LBJ elected to congress.
Anything that happened less than fifty years ago?
Would you expect anything else?
Anything bad said about Democrats must be true, no matter how thin the corroberating evidence. Any contradicting evidence is dismissed as "part of the conspiracy".
Same bull confirmation bias that propagates 9-11 conspiracy theories and "faked moon landing" hoaxes.
I am not so naive as to think no election in the modern US has ever been effected by fraud of some type, but if WC thinks it was a Democrat conspiracy, I would be really really really skeptical of his claim unless supported by some very solid outside evidence.
How much of that fraud is covered by existing laws, and how much will be prevented by the proposed voter ID law?
For someone who pisses and moans about establishing new beaurocracy and increasing goverment size, are you comfortable with a new redundant law that increases beaurocracy and increasing goverment size to solve a problem that is, by any realistic measure, non-existant?
All and none, respectively.
CC knows this.
CC doesn't care.
CC roots for his team.
lol wikipedia
Before you try to answer CC... I have researched a few of those.
Shockingly, the "fraud"... wasn't. A lot of what gets listed as fraud ends up being simple clerical errors and record keeping lags.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)