Reply With Quote
Should read "lmao bitter Paul s" tbh.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1880172.html
Willard
Should read "lmao bitter Paul s" tbh.
Sorry, but if this happens, Willard would be the first candidate since William Jennings Bryant to have multiple faithless electors.... that would reflect poorly on HIM, not Ron Paul supporters, tbh....
No, it reflects on Paul supporters, who can't stop being assholes. They deserved to be disenfranchised. I'd make sure they never had the chance to be assholes again.Sorry, but if this happens, Willard would be the first candidate since William Jennings Bryant to have multiple faithless electors.... that would reflect poorly on HIM, not Ron Paul supporters, tbh....
Paul supporters have every right to be bitter. They are plentiful motivated organized and saavy in approach.
You then look at s like Grover Norquist who have money backing them and are able to get the GOP by the balls.
Paul worries me but his movement would have actually resulted in change around Washington had he been given a fair shot and I like that a of a lot more than the tiness that passes through nowadays.
Those electors are using the electoral college to be used for what it was intended for. They were within their rights and I hope they tell the parties to go themselves.
"Ron Paul supporters are such assholes for not abandoning their principles and whoring themselves out to the moneyed elite!"
Too funny how you're defending election fraud now, but I'm sure you threw a fit over the election fraud in 2000, tbh....
"the election fraud in 2000"
that was in the Presidential election, RP isn't even a Pres nominee, a fringe fantaisist bug squashed, again and again and again.
Didn't tbh
Too funny how you're defending election fraud now, but I'm sure you threw a fit over the election fraud in 2000, tbh....
lol fraud
primaries < > general elections anyway
Had Paul s taken the high road, I'd have more sympathy for them -- but from the very beginning when it was clear he had no popular support, they immediately started looking for ways to be assholes because they couldn't accept that most people just don't like their guy.
As were the RNCheat frauds in 2008 and 2012...
RP won the GOP nomination from the floor, only to have it stolen from him at the last second by a rigged voice vote and the Maine screwjob, tbh....RP isn't even a Pres nominee
How is RP a fringe fanaticist?a fringe fantaisist bug squashed, again and again and again.
Suuuure...
The only people who don't recognize a rigged convention as election fraud are the culprits, neocons, and Ron Paul haters, tbh....lol fraud
So vote-rigging is somehow okay until the general election in your world? So much for that "love of democracy" you like to tout, tbh....primaries < > general elections anyway
RP supporters did take the high road, tbh.... while the crooks were flipping votes in the primaries, getting primaries cancelled due to a couple snowflakes in MAINE, and even committing violence against Paul supporters, we just handled our biz, got delegates elected, took over our local arms of the GOP, and operated within the rules of the GOP and the republican form of government guaranteed to us in the Cons ution, tbh....Had Paul s taken the high road, I'd have more sympathy for them
Wrong.... RP performed well in both hypothetical matchup polls against Obama AND favorability ratings.... get your facts straight, B....but from the very beginning when it was clear he had no popular support
Once again, completely false....they immediately started looking for ways to be assholes because they couldn't accept that most people just don't like their guy.
No completely true.
I agree the RNC overreacted to the irrelevant Paul campaign, but that's because they stated they were going to be assholes from the very beginning.
lol hypothetical matchups
Dude finished fourth. A completely disinterested Newt Gingrich kicked his ass without even trying.
Only as long as you ignore all the facts, tbh....
So irrelevant that you've devoted a sizeable amount of your 70,188 posts on here bashing it....I agree the RNC overreacted to the irrelevant Paul campaign
BTW, with 70,000+ posts on here, I'm not surprised that you have no clue what's been going on in this election... too busy posting throwaway lines and UTSA rhetorical devices all day....
Source?but that's because they stated they were going to be assholes from the very beginning.
Polling companies do them for everyone, including your beloved Willard Romney....lol hypothetical matchups
Dude finished first, had his win stolen from him and delegates illegally taken away, and STILL had more influence, delegates, and a bigger role at the RNCheat than fatass Newt, tbh...Dude finished fourth. A completely disinterested Newt Gingrich kicked his ass without even trying.
fantasist, someone who believes/pushes fantasies like killing the Fed, fractional banking, and going back to the gold standard, killing regulations and "just trust everybody To Do The Right Thing", etc, etc, etc.
Romney 10,023,280 52.12%
Santorum 3,931,019 20.44%
Gingrich 2,734,300 14,22%
Paul 2,095,619 10.90%
Sounds like the Cons ution to me.... I guess our Founders were also fanaticists?
Romney 10,023,280 52.12%
Santorum 3,931,019 20.44%
Gingrich 2,734,300 14,22%
Paul 2,095,619 10.90%
You thought that was a random poll with no context?
Holy !
You just proved you have no knowledge of the political system. I'd have to spend 10,000 posts explaining to each of your screen names what the you just saw.
All irrelevant given what I posted.
Do you still not know what I posted?
Yeah, it's the so-called "popular vote" in the primaries, yet you completely missed the greater context of the vote-rigging that occurred, as well as the fact that the popular vote is just a meaningless straw poll while the real point of primaries and caucuses are to elect delegates to the convention....
Remind me again who knows nothing about our political system?
lol so called
lol the greater context of hypothetical polls
Paul was going to lose the nomination no matter what. There was no scenario where he would win.
At all.
Scoreboard.
Ron Paul did win... the RNC had to cheat and screw over all future grassroots to reverse it...
Scoreboard.
How are they "saavy"?
Getting delegates elected to the convention, putting electors in the Electoral College, taking over state and local Republican Parties, and raising awareness of libertarian politics at large in spite of a biased mainstream media are all pretty savvy, tbh.... far savvier than cheating at the convention and outright buying the nomination like Willard did....
Show me the scoreboard that shows he won.
I showed you the scoreboard that shows he lost to Newt Gingrich.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
