Reply With Quote
No, they didn't.
Paul had no chance either way.
Prove me wrong.
Why do people treat Ron Paul supporters like they're Nazis and lepers?
No, they didn't.
Paul had no chance either way.
Prove me wrong.
I don't stalk women on the internet.
You still don't get it, do you. It's the ethics of how it happened.
You still don't get it, do you? No one is talking to you and he claims that Paul could have won. I never disagreed that it was a wrong and stupid thing to do, just understandable since Paul s promised to be assholes.
Don't even try to talk to me about ethics, stalker.
I see it as very unlikely, but yes. I also see it as possible that Ron Paul could have won the convention. They played the game to win the convention, not the popular vote.
You saying it was impossible for Paul to win is moronic.
Prove it.
Don't whine and say you won't take the time.
Prove.
It.
Wow...
That's lame even for you.
I say I only see it as "very unlikely" and you want me to prove that?
YOU!
You said it was "possible," flaglot.
I didn't expect a meltdown, but whatever.
ethics!
in politics?
in American public or corporate life?
No meltdown here. Just amazed at how stupid you have become. I know you are an asshole, but I never knew you were really that stupid, till now.
OK Boutons.ethics!
in politics?
in American public or corporate life?
I stand corrected...
And by you...
Oh ...
The shame of it all...
Top Romney Adviser Faults Obama For Murder Of U.S. Ambassador, Claims Romney Would Have Prevented Attack
Advisers to Mitt Romney on Thursday defended his sharp criticism of President Obama and said that the deadly protests sweeping the Middle East would not have happened if the Republican nominee were president.
“There’s a pretty compelling story that if you had a President Romney, you’d be in a different situation,” Richard Williamson, a top Romney foreign policy adviser, said in an interview. “For the first time since Jimmy Carter, we’ve had an American ambassador assassinated.”
http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...vented-attack/
So I can say:
"If Gore would have been President, then 9/11 would have not happened"
One of the most common, biggest mistakes people make is to assume/confuse personal ethics and morality as also applying to group ethics/morality.
a group's priority is to strengthen the group, to recruit/indoctrinate new members usually with high entrance requirement (initiation, the more difficult/painful/expensive, the better the member's commitment to the group), to demonize/fight/destroy other groups.
Any individual in the group is expendable to serve the group's objectives.
eg: religions and cults, criminal gangs, the military, countries, political parties, top management of organizations, etc, etc. Applies to almost any group.
People who think they are very moral, ethical as individuals, and might even be so, will say nothing against, and even engage in completely immoral/unethical/criminal activities to serve the group.
The classic example is The Holy Roman Catholic Church allowing their priests to violate and rape children for decades, centuries? (does anybody think this crime is a 20th century only crime), in order to protect the priests and above all protect the One True Eternal Church, AT ALL COSTS (to individuals, including children).
Wow...
My admission must have made you !
Stall. Deflect. Distract.
It wasn't possible. You failed.
slapping WC silly is always a blast
I didn't feel . You must be having some twisted fantasy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
