Bill Nye slams creationism

[RandomGuy]

What I want to know is how we are a different species than neanderthal or several other hominids we reproduced with. I thought being able to mate with and reproduce with something made you of the same species.

The exact defintion of "species" is somewhat, um, fuzzy.

Once you start delving into the actual current science and debate, there are several slightly differing definitions in the more advanced materials.

[RandomGuy]

I will Give Blake and his cronies until Saturday to post "solid" proof Man Evolved from a Primate.

Let me know if its not enough time.

That information is there already, and is very readily available.

You would however, need to understand the vageries of bones, morphistic charactoristics, genetics, and fossil evidence.

Even were I to bother with it, you would simply cut and paste something and run off.

Trying to teach you valid science or debate scientific issues with you is a waste of time, and everybody here knows it.

[RandomGuy]

... who the am I kidding, Im arguing with a moron that believes in conspiracy theories like we didnt land on the moon.

[Fabbs]

First things first...


Get that straight. We had a common ape-like ancestor at some point in time and the evidence is overwhelming if you would just take the time to look it up.



The evidence is clear as day if you would just choose to look at it objectively.

This is HARD evidence, actual fossils, not some peter-pan fictional moral story out of a book written by man. It's all supported by peer-review and all carbon dated with every C14 scanner known to man.

In their desire to find evidence of “ape-men,” some scientists have been taken in by outright fraud, for example, the Piltdown man in 1912. For about 40 years it was accepted as genuine by most of the evolutionary community. Finally, in 1953, the hoax was uncovered when modern techniques revealed that human and ape bones had been put together and artificially aged. In another instance, an apelike “missing link” was drawn up and presented in the press. But it was later acknowledged that the “evidence” consisted of only one tooth that belonged to an extinct form of pig.

and

In a book review of The Myths of Human Evolution written by evolutionists Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall, Discover magazine observed that the authors eliminated any evolutionary family tree. Why? After noting that “the links that make up the ancestry of the human species can only be guessed at,” this publication stated: “Eldredge and Tattersall insist that man searches for his ancestry in vain. .Luck_The_Fakers_.Luck_The_Fakers_. If the evidence were there, they contend, ‘one could confidently expect that as more hominid fossils were found the story of human evolution would become clearer. Whereas, if anything, the opposite has occurred.’”

[Blake]

I will expose you and your misguided Darwin groupies for the lying frauds you all are.

You were exposed as an idiot long long ago.

Nothing about that will change after Saturday

[DisAsTerBot]

In their desire to find evidence of “ape-men,” some scientists have been taken in by outright fraud, for example, the Piltdown man in 1912. For about 40 years it was accepted as genuine by most of the evolutionary community. Finally, in 1953, the hoax was uncovered when modern techniques revealed that human and ape bones had been put together and artificially aged. In another instance, an apelike “missing link” was drawn up and presented in the press. But it was later acknowledged that the “evidence” consisted of only one tooth that belonged to an extinct form of pig.

ah, and thus.........god and jesus and the bible, amen

[Fabbs]

ah, and thus.........god and jesus and the bible, amen

Insecure Evo man strikes again.

[redzero]

In their desire to find evidence of “ape-men,” some scientists have been taken in by outright fraud, for example, the Piltdown man in 1912. For about 40 years it was accepted as genuine by most of the evolutionary community. Finally, in 1953, the hoax was uncovered when modern techniques revealed that human and ape bones had been put together and artificially aged. In another instance, an apelike “missing link” was drawn up and presented in the press. But it was later acknowledged that the “evidence” consisted of only one tooth that belonged to an extinct form of pig.

and

In a book review of The Myths of Human Evolution written by evolutionists Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall, Discover magazine observed that the authors eliminated any evolutionary family tree. Why? After noting that “the links that make up the ancestry of the human species can only be guessed at,” this publication stated: “Eldredge and Tattersall insist that man searches for his ancestry in vain. .Luck_The_Fakers_.Luck_The_Fakers_. If the evidence were there, they contend, ‘one could confidently expect that as more hominid fossils were found the story of human evolution would become clearer. Whereas, if anything, the opposite has occurred.’”

So you are saying that just because there is fraud that ALL evidence must be thrown out? There's already scrutiny in the scientific community. Those frauds being found out is evidence of that.

[Blake]

In their desire to find evidence of “ape-men,” some scientists have been taken in by outright fraud, for example, the Piltdown man in 1912. For about 40 years it was accepted as genuine by most of the evolutionary community. Finally, in 1953, the hoax was uncovered when modern techniques revealed that human and ape bones had been put together and artificially aged. In another instance, an apelike “missing link” was drawn up and presented in the press. But it was later acknowledged that the “evidence” consisted of only one tooth that belonged to an extinct form of pig.

and

In a book review of The Myths of Human Evolution written by evolutionists Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall, Discover magazine observed that the authors eliminated any evolutionary family tree. Why? After noting that “the links that make up the ancestry of the human species can only be guessed at,” this publication stated: “Eldredge and Tattersall insist that man searches for his ancestry in vain. .Luck_The_Fakers_.Luck_The_Fakers_. If the evidence were there, they contend, ‘one could confidently expect that as more hominid fossils were found the story of human evolution would become clearer. Whereas, if anything, the opposite has occurred.’”

More failed plagiarism

[Blake]

Insecure Evo man strikes again.

Copy/pasting man fails again

[Fabbs]

Future history books (or for that matter current ones)

Insecure SemiErectus Evo Man
Found remains of t-bone steak while digging under property. Surmised this made them hotshot hipster Evos as this must prove that humans evolved from t-bone steaks.


Becomes highly defensive-insecure when unsupported fabrications are questioned. Claims to get all information on their own but in reality simply absorbed readings of Evos.

[DisAsTerBot]

Becomes highly defensive-insecure when unsupported fabrications are questioned. Claims to get all information on their own but in reality simply absorbed readings of Evos.

lol the irony

[RandomGuy]

In their desire to find evidence of “ape-men,” some scientists have been taken in by outright fraud, for example, the Piltdown man in 1912. For about 40 years it was accepted as genuine by most of the evolutionary community. Finally, in 1953, the hoax was uncovered when modern techniques revealed that human and ape bones had been put together and artificially aged. In another instance, an apelike “missing link” was drawn up and presented in the press. But it was later acknowledged that the “evidence” consisted of only one tooth that belonged to an extinct form of pig.

and

In a book review of The Myths of Human Evolution written by evolutionists Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall, Discover magazine observed that the authors eliminated any evolutionary family tree. Why? After noting that “the links that make up the ancestry of the human species can only be guessed at,” this publication stated: “Eldredge and Tattersall insist that man searches for his ancestry in vain. .Luck_The_Fakers_.Luck_The_Fakers_. If the evidence were there, they contend, ‘one could confidently expect that as more hominid fossils were found the story of human evolution would become clearer. Whereas, if anything, the opposite has occurred.’”

Neither of those tidbids somehow disproves decades of science underlying the theory of evolution as the best fit for available evidence.

(edit)

You should however cite your source.

This bit has been spammed around the internets quite a bit.

[Fabbs]

Neither of those tidbids somehow disproves decades of science underlying the theory of evolution as the best fit for available evidence.

(edit)

You should however cite your source.

This bit has been spammed around the internets quite a bit.

I didn't know i was under the burden of disproving decades of theories. Was just picking a couple points. Have yet to have pro Evo person respond to the point(s) in question. Are you saying Piltdown man was/is legit?

Also the quotes name the books authors.

[mouse]

That information is there already, and is very readily available.

Link?

[DMC]

Reading a science debate featuring Mouse is like watching a mud wrestling contest only the mud is actually and the contestants are two re ed, overweight balding men in their 50's.

[Agloco]

Trying to teach you valid science or debate scientific issues with you is a waste of time, and everybody here knows it.

I've resorted to leaving 'serious' out of this "debate", and more generally whenever mouse is in the mix. You must admit though, these threads are good for a few chuckles in between sips of Marnier or whatever drink pleases you.

[Agloco]

Reading a science debate featuring Mouse is like watching a mud wrestling contest only the mud is actually and the contestants are two re ed, overweight balding men in their 50's.

[mouse]

A few outdated insults and poor attempts at humor and still no proof.


Tick tock ........

[DMC]

You guys keep showing me proof, I can always just feign ignorance and switch personalities to get support. Besides, no one seems interested in my old "me" photos and the old crew doesn't come around any longer.

[DMC]

Start here Mr MIT dropout

[MultiTroll]

A few outdated insults and poor attempts at humor and still no proof.


Tick tock ........

The object on the left is clearly about ready to evolve into the object on the right.

[mouse]

Still no proof looks like I made my point.

[Blake]

Still no proof looks like I made my point.

No you didn't. You're stupid.

[mouse]

No you didn't. You're stupid.

Just when you think the IQ bar can't be lowered any further.

10 minutes to Sunday and no proof.