Reply With Quote
They'll lose to Clemson
lol usc
I guess I'll take Florida State as my national le bandwagon team now.
They'll lose to Clemson
Since you don't care about conferences, why are you defending yours?
No Auburn sucks, look at my posts regarding them.thinking that hurts my feelings. Again, what have I posted that's wrong? Do you really think anybody other than Oregon can hang with the top 4 of the SEC?
You have a pattern of getting ass pained when someone points out the obvious.(SEC>PAC-10)
I'll be pointing things like this out all season... Keep running in here to cry if thats what you feel you need to do
I'm not defending a conference.....I'm making fun of conference pride which you are filled with.
The fact you thump your chest to "SEC>PAC10!!!" as if its something you should be proud of is what's really funny.
But to answer your question, USC was the only team I thought could hang with Bama and LSU. I don't think even Oregon can. I sure as know Arizona can't so the rest doesn't matter. I just think conference pride is gay
I just read that USC has given up an average of 42 pts to Stanford in the past 4 meetings. Even back in the Leinart-Bush glory days, the Cardinal have never been an easy out for the Trojans. The defense that has been masquerading for the past half decade is not worthy of a no. 1 team that's a shame because it used to be really good. Also, the offensive line is more horrid than I thought. Losing the Kalil and Khaled Holmes seems to have been too much of a strain to bear. Oh well, maybe it'll be more free spirited play since now the pressure of trying to be the team that dethrones the SEC run is lifted off of them. Bummer...but no time to fret because a dangerous Cal team comes to town.
This.I just think conference pride is gay
It's pretty re ed when you have Auburn and Arkansas fans rooting for Alabama in national championship games, or LSU fans says "at least it stayed in the SEC" when they lost the NC game last year.
That crap is re ed as .
LOL sons its so cute how bitter some of you are. I do agree however that some people may take conference pride a bit too far, but who can blame them? All it proves when people about it is that it really must suck to be a fan of a team outside of the SEC because deep down you know that your team has a much easier route and will never truly be considered legit until they take down the top 2 or 3 in the SEC. That's just the truth. If you want to be the best then you have to beat the best and the SEC has proven to be the best conference by far for a long time now.
Personally speaking I cheer for one team and one team only until the bowl games. Then I'll cheer for every SEC team to win their bowl games as well. It keeps our conference strong and anyone who disagrees with that is just downright bitter. Just ask the "national powerhouse" Ohio State and their fans about it ... it took them 9 straight bowl game beat downs by SEC teams to finally win one against a weaker South Carolina team last year. That type of brings joy to many fans of numerous teams.
BR, regulating as usual.
I cheer for a team that has never even been to the Rose Bowl or any BCS Bowl. I gave up on UofA being the best at football a long ass time ago. If you think I blame the SEC for why Arizona is far from being an elite program then you're extremely stupid.
I also find it funny SEC fans think one Pac-12 team beating another Pac-12 team is somehow a victory for their conference
umm son when did I ever say you did?
no son that's not it at all. its just fun watching one overrated scrub team beat up on another overrated scrub team. that is all.I also find it funny SEC fans think one Pac-12 team beating another Pac-12 team is somehow a victory for their conference
We need more Pac-12 vs SEC interconference matchups. That's the only way we'll ever shut up those hillbillies.
Son Oregon State would definitely give Kentucky, Vandy, and Ole PISS a run for their money. No doubt about that.
son I doubt if they could even do that considering the SEC is such a superior football playing group of teams that even bottom dwelling teams on any given year would easily be the #1 team in another conference, especially the wack-12.
Find where I've ever "rooted" for Alabama. I actively "root" for their plane to explode when they fly to away gamesI'm not defending a conference.....I'm making fun of conference pride which you are filled with.
The fact you thump your chest to "SEC>PAC10!!!" as if its something you should be proud of is what's really funny.
But to answer your question, USC was the only team I thought could hang with Bama and LSU. I don't think even Oregon can. I sure as know Arizona can't so the rest doesn't matter. I just think conference pride is gay
What I do instead is point out that they are a better football team than any Pac-10 school. As is LSU and probably UGA, USCe, and UF.
Find an analyst anywhere who thinks anyone in the PAC is better than LSU/Bama
Don't get me confused with Aggy who goes around posting SEC banners and all of a sudden thinks they're better than everyone because they're in the SEC
All I said was something along the lines of "
People saw that and came a runnin' trying to defend the indefensible
Here's what I said...How can this be construed as conference cheerleading?Can't help but agree. Although it's a rivalry game, anyone who thinks that either of these teams could play with LSU/Bama/UGA is smoking crack...Might even throw UF in there after an impressive win tonight in Knoxville. Oregon is the only team in the PAC who would even have a chance against those teams.
Oh yeah BR, you're going down next week in Auburn
This is exactly how I feel about the SEC. Except Bama. I would sacrifice a 2nd or 3rd removed family member to cannibals in New Guinea in order to have them lose every game.
And what is the reason behind pointing that out? Conference pride? Oh okay.
Um, no. You basically fell for a troll job by DoK. No one was saying Pac-12>SEC in any way, shape, or form.All I said was something along the lines of "
People saw that and came a runnin' trying to defend the indefensible
Why do you feel the need to "point out" obvious stuff no one ever disagreed with?
So you felt the need to regergitate something every analyst says? That seems pretty pointless.
Why did you feel the need to point out something obvious given no one disagreed with it?All I said was something along the lines of "
Who defended it? I even went further and said Oregon wouldn't compete with the SEC. Point out where someone disagreed. Be specific. I've talked more about Pac-12 football than anyone on this site.
you, you crippled face. I already said the same thing. I will skull you with my walking brace if you ever come around here again, you little boy.
BOOMER! SOONER!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
