Reply With Quote
Here's my original one. I moved in in photobucket, so that's why it isn't in the OP.
Sure, according to the maker of the quiz.
The chart is plotted using personal and economic.
You: personal=73.6, economic=49
Me: personal=48.3, economic=65.6
The chart can be altered. Mine is unaltered. Is yours or others? I altered this one to 70/90:
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 09-28-2012 at 02:55 PM.
Here's my original one. I moved in in photobucket, so that's why it isn't in the OP.
I really don't care enough about what people think on here to alter it.Sure, according to the maker of the quiz.
The chart is plotted using personal and economic.
You: personal=73.6, economic=49
Me: personal=48.3, economic=65.6
The chart can be altered. Mine is unaltered. Is yours or others? I altered this one to 70/90:
But as I've always said on here, I'm very libertarian when it comes to social policies, and a lot more liberal economically. That's why I wasn't surprised at the outcome.
Mine looks like RG and the micks but what got me was this comment from the description:
There is no political party that represents your views. The Green Party does run many candidates with similar views, but the overall Green Party platform is much more socialistic than you are. There are some Democratic Party office holders in this region, but most are south of you on the Nolan Chart. Possibly the closest party to your views is the new Modern Whig Party, but they are just getting started.
I got the same comments Fuzzy. Which is about how I feel with politics now... Dems are closer than Republicans, but aren't quite "my" party.
I am reading about the MWP that they mentioned.
http://www.modernwhig.org/handbook/w...ional-security
is a handbook to their platform. It's simplified but i am not interested in a thesis atm. I haven't even bothered to see if they are so much as semi legitimate though.
Looks like your concern for the economy isn't as good as mine is, at least according to the guy who made the charting method.I really don't care enough about what people think on here to alter it.
These things are too simplified to accurately plot anyone except those who are extreme.
From what I have read so far, the seem to be a more responsible form of libertarians. I agree with almost everything I read so far, so I doubt you will with your authoritarian thinking.
They are economically liberal and socially conservative which is more or less my position. They are economically authoritarian, dimwit. Review their tax, energy and financial policy positions.
They want to raise, subsidize and regulate them respectively, dumbass.
For health care they want to eliminate employer health plans. Consider renewable energy sources to be the basis of our next economic boom.
They want to blow up the single member winner take all district. Make campaign financing a public expense etc.
Have you even paid attention at all?
And I forgot the guy that advocates sterilizing those that receive social services calls me an authoritarian...
Irony alert!
yeah, one of these things that I took said I agreed with Jill Stein more than anyone else. I had never heard of her.
What I keep noticing is that none of these things put me in Obama's or Romney's camp.
I think there is a message trying to reach me somewhere in all this.
^^^ Come to think of it, how could anyone end up in Romney's camp? His positions change daily if not hourly. The man has GOT to have a sore neck from the whiplash.
There you go, exposing your severe case of stupidity again.
You obviously read more than I did. No, I wouldn't like many of those proposals. The fact you don't know how to interpret what people say really does expose your stupidity.From what I have read so far
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 09-29-2012 at 03:51 AM.
the thing is that everyone here thinks your dumb already. they all know I am belligerent but not dumb. when you make these comments about me being stupid you aren't convincing anyone. it just makes you look more dumb.
it was abundantly obvious that you had read almost nothing of their policy positions as I outlined in my response. my pointing that out does not make me stupid but rather demonstrates how you are flippant on top of your lack of intelligence.
Keep telling yourself those lies. I don't care. I simply cannot believe how ing stupid you are. It sure would be nice if you said something intelligent.
Lies? Ahh i see now you are going little -mode once again.
your grade school level insults speak louder than your claims.
do you really want to continue with this?
You selected your alignment, but you forgot to position your dot. That did not come from your test. Did it...
Should I place the dot here:
Or here:
Or here:
Or were you shooting for this?
No.
You aren't a challenge at all. You are pitiful.
You selected your alignment, but you forgot to position your dot. That did not come from your test. Did it...
Should I place the dot here:
Or here:
Or here:
Or were you shooting for this?
c.)
LOL...
Did you even take the test?
He might not because he has the steering wheel and a headrest.
The rest of us just have to be subjected to his "I know I said something different in the past, please ignore that, because I want to change my position to something new that I think will maximize my chances of getting elected" whipsaws...
Obama lied as much, but at least his lies were consistent, the worst you could get out of it was disappointed. Romney is just so blatant about it, I find my intelligence insulted.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
