I think you better do what he says, Mr. Kinney
I think you better do what he says, Mr. Kinney
5....4....3....2....1....I am now authorized to use physical force.
lee might be a 20-10 player, but are those ststs correlated to wins? or just blatant statpadding?
Old ED-209 meet New ED-209
![]()
are boris'? yall in idiots you
I'm sorry, I can't hear that over the sound of you watching anime.
I love how mavs>spurs ignores the fact that I conceded long ago that Lee is way better at staying motivated and stat-padding on teams. Lee put up 20-10 on a fast paced GS team with a bunch of injuries where he was likely the 2nd option; something he wouldnt be on a good team. Especially not if he was thrown into the Spurs mid-season.
I would take David Lee over Boris Diaw. Simply put, David Lee is a scorer, a better rebounder and a bigger body. Some argue that he's just a 4th or 5th option on the best teams but isn't Diaw?
Also, it's infuriating that with Diaw's skillset, he can't even carry a team. He's 6'8" or 6'9" for God's sakes.
I like David Lee as a player, but he just isn't a winner or a decent defender...
Thats been my point the whole time, which is why you take his 20-10 with a grain of salt cause he wouldnt put those kind of stats on good teams. Comparing who would be a better 4th-5th best player on a team its pretty close and taking Diaw isnt really homerish. Lee is a better rebounder and scorer but Id rather have Diaw because of his range, ability to facilitate, and the fact that hes not a terrible defender.
Boris Diaw is not any better of a defender than Diaw. This is a classic GNSF fallacy of assuming a player who plays for the Spurs is a much better defender than a player who doesn't play for the Spurs.
No, not really. Saying Diaw is a better defender than Lee is pretty reasonable, not because Diaw is a defensive stopper but because Lee is just that terrible on that end.
i don't think that's true... I mean, Lee was really only part of awful defensive teams while Diaw has been an integral part of a Charlotte playoff team.. Also, San Antonio's D made major strides when Diaw came..
So your argument regarding who's individual's defense is is which player is on a better defensive team. I truly admire the way Spurfan uses arguments that don't have any logical fallacies![]()
Is the David Lee who's extremely terrible on defense also the David Lee who's bread and butter is midrange jumpers?
Are you really trying to argue that David Lee isnt a bad defensive player?![]()
I'm arguing he's no worse than Diaw, and that he isn't the historically bad defensive player you're portraying him as.
I don't remember Diaw being a great defender on the Suns. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
It's human nature for fans to hype their own scrub players. We've seen this with Gary Neal and Danny Green too--both of which were on the fast-track to slangin rock before Pop picked them up.
Based on what? I dont think Lee has ever shown anything to suggest hes not a bad defender. Diaw showed more defensively just in his short stint with the Spurs, which admittedly wasnt anything special, than Lee ever has.
Dont get why the word great is being thrown around. I dont think Ive ever called Diaw a defensive stopper, hes simply not a liability which is more than you can say for Lee.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)