sorry buddy i don't really put much stock into your opinions
Oh cool, more usage of vague and subjective rhetoric like "average" and "terrible"Diaw is average, Lee is terrible. How much more specific do you want, you want me to quantify it?
If that's as specific as you're capable of being, then that's all that needs to be said, but yes, please do quantify your argument.
Wow you really made my post look dumb! Its hilarious when you use this method to put down posts.
Not as funny as when you think declaring yourself the winner of an argument makes it so you won the argument.
This is just dumb and desperate. You want me to give each player a numerical rating or what?
Why do you think quantifying your argument is such a tough task?
I know this might seem hard to believe, but an argument that X>Y because you subjectively label X as average and Y as terrible without have any objective evidence backing either subjective label isn't exactly winning any speech & debate compe ions anytime soon.
So youre saying you have no idea what a terrible defender is? Or an average one? Im sure youve seen Lee play defense. Im sure youve seen Diaw play defense.
The terms "terrible defender" and "average defender" are both completely subjective and vague. So no, I have no idea what you mean by "terrible" and "average". You also label David Lee as someone who relies completely on midrange jumpers off assists when they account for a very small portion of his scoring, so your idea of "average" and "terrible" is especially lost on me.
A liability on that side of the ball. I even gave examples of other players of the same mold as Lee. Its not that hard tbh.
Classifying someone as "a liability on that side of the ball" is also subjective.
Why haven't you quantified them on defense yet?
So basically you want to look strictly at stats, both offensively and defensively, to determine who is better at each area ?
No, but that sounds a lot better than looking strictly at subjective labels Spurs fans give Spurs players.
Given your subjective label of David Lee as "someone who only contributes midrange jumpers off assists," I'm probably not gonna trust your subjective label of Lee's defense any time soon either.
I really hope this post isn't serious
Is there something in the Riverwalk today that's been going around?
Gooden has averaged 14-10 for a good Cleveland team before. Blair 8-9 ppg and 6-7 rpg for the Spurs in limited minutes. Why wouldnt these sorry mofos average a double-double in a bad, fast-paced, injury riddled GS team ?
The next time Drew Gooden averages double figure rebounds will be his first time so I am not sure where 14 10 comes from.
thinking Dejuan Blair's knees wouldn't explode playing the minutes on GS Lee plays
Not to mention Gooden is dumb as a tree branch. Bad comparison tbh.
Oh, my bad I forgot you like to dwell on little . Drew Gooden averaged 14.4 ppg and 9.2 rpg on a good Cleveland team so why wouldnt he average a double-double on a bad, fast-paced, injury riddled GS team?
This is exactly why your usage of subjective terms like "good" or "bad" isn't something I trust.
They had a winning record. But if you wanna dwell on that take your pick with the following two years where he averaged ~11-8.5 for them.
This is exactly why your usage of subjective terms like "good" or "bad" isn't something I trust.
?
You just moved the goalposts to a golf course
¿ how ?
Id take Lee over Gooden fwiw, but I still think theyre the same type of player thats really good at putting up nice empty stats. Blair too.
why u still posting bro
my day off and girls at work
wat about you ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
