Reply With Quote
lol Lakerfan not forgetting 2002 WCF, just wanting to stir the pot and the job is done
lol Lakerfan not forgetting 2002 WCF, just wanting to stir the pot and the job is done
I'm an LA Kings fan, so therefore, I'm a championship fan, tbh....
I'm an LA Kings fan, so therefore, I'm a championship fan, tbh....- well played, sir. Well played.
you bet ya! Why stop at 07, lets go to 03 05 for bonus
"Every le not won by the Lakers deserves an asterisk"
^ The Clippers should go back to San Diego tbh. Clipper Fans are really Laker fans that can't afford to go to Laker games. Their tickets are a little more than $2 for courtside seats. And you call Kobe Food Stamp?
Yawn... horrendously old material and terrible takes, par for the course from Lkr ....^ The Clippers should go back to San Diego tbh. Clipper Fans are really Laker fans that can't afford to go to Laker games. Their tickets are a little more than $2 for courtside seats. And you call Kobe Food Stamp?
spurs didn't take on them lakers face-to-face in most of their championship years though. the past record between the two teams in the postseason doesn't count in spurs favor imho. spurs were lucky they got other teams (mavs and suns especially) to handle the lakers and wipe them out
Last edited by Latarian Milton; 10-13-2012 at 07:52 PM.
Not really, it's just funny and ironic that a Lakerfan would make a thread about a rigged seriesKool - if they won without any key Suns players getting suspended, then I agree with you. However, they got an assist from the NBA offices in New York on det one. On one hand, you have man kick another man in the balls and not so much as a flagrant is called. On the other hand you have people come to the aid of a fallen teammate get suspended for a playoff game? That is hardly fair to the Suns. I got a PM from Phillip Jackson and he has given me full authority to put an * next to the 2007 Finals winners.
Lakers Fan pretending the Kings have never been good. Especially not in one specific year.
Sincerely,
ter McGee
^ The Clippers should go back to San Diego tbh. Clipper Fans are really Laker fans that can't afford to go to Laker games. Their tickets are a little more than $2 for courtside seats. And you call Kobe Food Stamp?
That's a side note to what I was saying, it has nothing to do with my point.
Not gonna show that video where Nash admits he flopped, huh? That's cool...no biggie. Scoreboard. Amare and Diaw broke the rules..they left the sideline. Horry got two games. When Amare and Diaw came back, Horry was still gone. Horry was the Spurs spark at that time. They should have won that game..they couldn't do it. They lost..period. Get over it. Oh..by the way...2002. That is all.
If the the Spurs had not won the le then yes, there should have been an asterisk after the league specifically targeted the Spurs with a disproportionate punishment. Horry was suspended two (2) games for his foul on Nash. A needlessly hard foul?, Yes, but all body to body, nothing hit from the neck up. Meanwhile, in the other series in the West exactly zero (0) suspensions combined were handed out for these fouls by Warriors players on the Utah Jazz, all of which had obvious malicious intent towards the headological area.
Vids don't lie. Neither does the rulebook. Boris and Amare broke a rule and got bit by mandatory sentencing. Wouldn't be the first time that policy makers loved how tough that made them sound when they created the rule and stuck the guys who have to enforce with no way to make a punishment actually fit the crime. If anything about this entire episode should upset a fan of the NBA it's the way that the league arbitrarily threw a two game suspension at one of its greatest champions while ignoring truly dangerous fouls by another team.
Tbh, I think it's because nobody viewed either the Jazz or Warriors as contenders... who cared about a couple of teams who were fighting for the right to get flattened by either the Spurs or Suns?
IIRC, the Spurs had a higher win percentage in PHX for those 2003,2005,and 2007 series. I always hear whining about "if only they made it to game seven", and I'm thinking that we would have beaten them up and taken their lunch money like we always did.
Inadmissible Evidence
Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main reason evidence is ruled inadmissible is because it falls into a category deemed so unreliable that a court should not consider it as part of a deciding a case --for example, hearsay evidence or an expert's opinion that is not based on facts generally accepted in the field. Evidence will also be declared inadmissible if it suffers from some other defect -- for example, as compared to its value, it will take too long to present or risks inflaming the jury. In addition, in criminal cases, evidence that is gathered using illegal methods is commonly ruled inadmissible.
Not really, it's just funny and ironic that a Lakerfan would make a thread about a rigged series
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
