Asteroid Dust could help Global Warming

[Wild Cobra]

Manny...

You have agreed that the Milankovitch Cycle effectively has no net change in the suns radiative forcing. What might 1.7% do? It probably wouldn't take up to an ice age event, but how much colder would the entire earth get?

[Latarian Milton]

hey WC i have a serious question to ask, what's the mysterious force do you think that keeps the continents moving northwards? haven't found any solid answer after reading through all books & articles i could found, but i suppose you can enlighten me on this one as you're such a professor in every known subject which must include geology and whatever that may help explain it imho

[Wild Cobra]

hey WC i have a serious question to ask, what's the mysterious force do you think that keeps the continents moving northwards? haven't found any solid answer after reading through all books & articles i could found, but i suppose you can enlighten me on this one as you're such a professor in every known subject which must include geology and whatever that may help explain it imho

I don't know and I don't care.

You know, I had you on ignore for probably 3 years. I finally just took everyone off my ignore list a few months ago. Maybe I should restore it?

Serious question, my ass.

[Latarian Milton]

seriously though i've been pondering this for years and i kinda agree with you that there're so many false stuffs on the internet that ain't worth a . so im asking this question in all honesty

[Wild Cobra]

seriously though i've been pondering this for years and i kinda agree with you that there're so many false stuffs on the internet that ain't worth a . so im asking this question in all honesty

Well, I don't know. I haven't looked at tectonic plate movement for a very long time, and I don't remember contemplating such things. The moon is probably the largest contributor though.

[Latarian Milton]

im not sure, the moon might be a factor but i don't think it makes that much impact like tides tbh. it's the spinning motion of the earth itself that generates the force pointing northward, and it's a similar force that gives an UFO (flying saucer) the upthrust and propellant imho. the speed of earth's spinning has been decreasing since the beginning of time, and the loss of energy was used mainly in the crusts' motions towards the north imho

[Wild Cobra]

im not sure, the moon might be a factor but i don't think it makes that much impact like tides tbh. it's the spinning motion of the earth itself that generates the force pointing northward, and it's a similar force that gives an UFO (flying saucer) the upthrust and propellant imho. the speed of earth's spinning has been decreasing since the beginning of time, and the loss of energy was used mainly in the crusts' motions towards the north imho

The moon acts on the magma much like it does the tidal waters. I suggest you rethink your UFO analogy. I don't place any merit in it. Maybe others do.

Why would the spinning move continents north rather than south? Maybe we are upside down... Maybe your theory is right for Antarctica...

[MannyIsGod]

Start here.

And nothing in that thread says what you said. Link me to the specific quote. Thanks.

[MannyIsGod]

Manny...

You have agreed that the Milankovitch Cycle effectively has no net change in the suns radiative forcing. What might 1.7% do? It probably wouldn't take up to an ice age event, but how much colder would the entire earth get?

Read the study in question. What do the scientists say? See, its good when you realize that you're wrong.

[mouse]

Wild Cobra 28

FuzzyLumpkins 23

MannyIsGod 11

Agloco 8



__________________

[Wild Cobra]

Read the study in question. What do the scientists say? See, its good when you realize that you're wrong.

What am I wrong about?

All I am saying is that blocking the sun by 1.7% is much more cooling than we need to combat the warming.

[mouse]

The mere fact that we still have asteroids is further proof the solar system is not "12 Billion" years old.

[Wild Cobra]

The mere fact that we still have asteroids is further proof the solar system is not "12 Billion" years old.

Sorry, but I disagree.

[mouse]

That is your right as an American to be misinformed.

[Latarian Milton]

The moon acts on the magma much like it does the tidal waters. I suggest you rethink your UFO analogy. I don't place any merit in it. Maybe others do.

Why would the spinning move continents north rather than south? Maybe we are upside down... Maybe your theory is right for Antarctica...

the first land on the earth appeared where today's antarctica is, i think that was after water moved northward and left the seabed exposed in air. antarctica is still the highest continent as to this day by al ude imho. also you know there's a big hole in the ozone layer over the antarctica (the south pole) but you don't see a similar one north, because the atmosphere of the southern half of the globe is thinner than that of the northern half at similar la udes imho.

the angular momentum of the earth's spinning points towards the north no matter from what direction it's viewed, and i do believe that vector multiplication is taught in most high schools tbh

[Wild Cobra]

Wild Cobra 28

FuzzyLumpkins 23

MannyIsGod 11

Agloco 8



__________________

Mouse...

You have me baffled with your point system. Is there any rhyme or reason to it?

[Wild Cobra]

the first land on the earth appeared where today's antarctica is, i think that was after water moved northward and left the seabed exposed in air. antarctica is still the highest continent as to this day by al ude imho. also you know there's a big hole in the ozone layer over the antarctica (the south pole) but you don't see a similar one north, because the atmosphere of the southern half of the globe is thinner than that of the northern half at similar la udes imho.

the angular momentum of the earth's spinning points towards the north no matter from what direction it's viewed, and i do believe that vector multiplication is taught in most high schools tbh

You might like this:

[Agloco]

The mere fact that we still have asteroids is further proof the solar system is not "12 Billion" years old.

Care to share what proof is given by their presence mouse?

[MannyIsGod]

What am I wrong about?

All I am saying is that blocking the sun by 1.7% is much more cooling than we need to combat the warming.

LOL and you came to this conclusion based on your calculations right? LOL

Who do you think knows more about the climate system: You or the scientists with the idea?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

im not sure, the moon might be a factor but i don't think it makes that much impact like tides tbh. it's the spinning motion of the earth itself that generates the force pointing northward, and it's a similar force that gives an UFO (flying saucer) the upthrust and propellant imho. the speed of earth's spinning has been decreasing since the beginning of time, and the loss of energy was used mainly in the crusts' motions towards the north imho

The moon acts on the magma much like it does the tidal waters. I suggest you rethink your UFO analogy. I don't place any merit in it. Maybe others do.

Why would the spinning move continents north rather than south? Maybe we are upside down... Maybe your theory is right for Antarctica...

Thanks LM. He knows your trolling him but he cannot help himself. Autism spectrum ftw!

[Agloco]

People like Manny and Fuzzy bring back past misstatements and past improper terminology and fail to acknowledge when someone corrected themselves. Are you going to continue to be the third stooge?

Now how do you think the 1.7% will affect the earth?

I'm sorry that you can't see past this figure and take a step back. There is a spectral perturbation that takes place long before any of this energy reaches the planet. Youre not considering the implications properly.

[DMX7]

That is your right as an American to be misinformed.

It's your right to be a paranoid conspiracy theorizing lunatic.

[Wild Cobra]

I'm sorry that you can't see past this figure and take a step back. There is a spectral perturbation that takes place long before any of this energy reaches the planet. Youre not considering the implications properly.

Please explain then. What don't I see? I know the spectrum will lean very slightly to the infrared, and I assume to an insignificant degree. If there is more than that, what is it? Are you saying the "knife edge effect" works with stellar dust being selective of spectra? Is is something else?

[Wild Cobra]

LOL and you came to this conclusion based on your calculations right? LOL

Who do you think knows more about the climate system: You or the scientists with the idea?

You already know I don't trust the way climate science is being taught.

Humor me. What do you think a 1.7% reduction of solar energy hitting the earth will do?

[Wild Cobra]

Thanks LM. He knows your trolling him but he cannot help himself. Autism spectrum ftw!

Do you consider, or fail to consider my blue text?