You can keep posting out of context and it wont make a difference. The issue at hand here is your misunderstanding of how a model that takes the atmosphere and condenses it into one layer for purposes in showing a surface temp due to GHG does not need to account for water vapor or heat distribution within that layer. You can keep throwing logrithmic and graphs all over the places and it just proves that you don't understand what the you're talking about ti anyone with a clue. Keep going though, its entertaining.





Reply With Quote
primarily



