Different reasons for different people, of course, but I know for at least a few of them it's because they got fed up trying to find a decent job in their field and are instead going to work toward being a librarian in that field.
What I thought initially.
Different reasons for different people, of course, but I know for at least a few of them it's because they got fed up trying to find a decent job in their field and are instead going to work toward being a librarian in that field.
Are you really comparing the difficulty of a heavy load of reading and writing to the difficulty of engineering?
No, I'm not. I'm saying that just because it's not engineering doesn't mean that graduate level art history isn't rigorous. The two programs are so different that I think any attempt at comparison is silly. And pointless.
Are you really comparing UTSA engineering to actual engineering?
So you know some doctors, lawyers and engineers who couldn't find gainful employment so they spent money to get a degree that would have them searching for work as a librarian.
Got it.
It's pretty ing sad that the Art Historian is the least arrogant of all the pretentious blowhards in here.
Nothing. I just make up as I go.
Art Historian has no reason to ever be arrogant.
You obviously don't know anyNot saying you're wrong, just that art world types are definitely one of the most pretentious, uppity groups you'll ever run into.
As sick as a third degree burn.![]()
spit out my drink tbh![]()
Throw good parties, though (for older types, anyway)
Arrogance is not something that is earned.
His head would only explode because he probably finds reading about how an Ancient Greek artist liked to goats and sculpt sculptures of men ing goats boring, pointless, and stupid. It's probably not because he isn't smart enough to and it's intellectually dishonest to pretend otherwise.
FYI, the reason so many engineering/science/business/etc. majors are so resentful towards liberals arts majors is because all of us had to waste time, tuition, and plenty of other things taking the bull liberal arts classes every major has to take as a gened, effectively subsidizing liberal arts colleges by paying tuition to take classes no one is interested in. It doesn't seem very hard to figure out why people resent those classes/areas of studies so much.
Considering how over saturated the market is for most majors, this whole measuring contest is pretty hilarious.
I didn't mention earning.
That's really not true. The market is littered with unfilled jobs in certain areas, but it's also littered with unemployed people who have no credentials to perform those jobs. Someone who's a graduating senior and a major in mathematics from a decent school with a GPA of probably 3.2ish or better probably has more potential job leads than he/she knows what to do with, the jobs being in a whole host of areas and jobs that pay well right out of school for just a BA (50k-60k).
Unfortunately, the market is also littered with political science, psychology, sociology, etc. majors who all have resumes that don't demonstrate any ability to use analytical/technical skills. Just from what I've seen the last few months, anyone with a resume that shows good technical/analytical skills can find a job right now.
The saturation may be in entry level positions, but there's no saturation in those that require experience. Were it saturated there would be no demand. You cannot sell ice to Eskimos. You certainly wouldn't get 6 figure salaries on saturated occupations. Someone with a degree in economics should understand that. Your career field might be tight, but don't falsely equate that to all career fields.
Learning a trade seems to be having a comeback. Less debt and working sooner.
And how do you get experience when the entry level positions are all filled?
Meh, it comes down to practicality. What puts food on the table and pays the bills? Sure there's a need for balance, but at the end of the day your job satisfaction won't pay the rent.
You don't spend 10 years in college prior to getting field experience in that area. There may be less room in entry level (out of college with no experience) positions, but if you have related experience in areas that do not require the same degree, that often will suffice for field experience and certainly puts you ahead of the career students. Internship is another very common route.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)