Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910
Results 226 to 245 of 245
  1. #226
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,466
    I thought you guys wanted a return to defense.

    Pick a lane.

  2. #227
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Curry was impressive, but not on the end of the floor where the Spurs needed him. Bet Blair outscores him this season.

  3. #228
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    But Powell's still on the team, right? Wasn't Curry better?

  4. #229
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    The Spurs are the definition of insanity. Same thing, over and over, pretending as if the result is going to be any different. No one has any illusion about what Curry is, but for the minimum and with a spot open, he was clearly a worthwhile project, at least for the time being.

    I'm sick and tired of people making excuses for the front office. They could have easily added a beefy center at the minimum, just to have around for depth purposes. Guys like Collins, Milicic, O'Neal, Harrellson, Fesenko and Magloire were all there for the taking (Fesenko technically is currently, though he may have an agreement in principal to re-join the Bulls on November 19th, when they can officially sign him and Magloire is technically still with the Raptors, but will be waived in short order). They must like getting pushed around and embarrassed.

  5. #230
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Thunder actually beat the spurs once they moved Durant to the 4 so they actually beat the spurs with there own verson of small ball.Lakers, well once the spurs can put together a roster worth 100 mil then the spurs will compete with them on paper..
    You can't force a team to play small ball but you can punish a team for playing small ball by beating them up inside.

  6. #231
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    I disagree..Both the Heat and Thunder got the championship game with small ball. Granted they have Lebron and Durant to plug in at the 4, but small ball can most definatly be a strength with the right players. Lakers had the best inside players in the NBA over the last 2 seasons and got run off the court against smaller teams. I agree that Curry would make the spurs bigger, but it would also make them slower, which pop has gone away from over the past 2 seasons. I also agree that you can beat teams on the inside, but in this day an age when touch fouls are called every time down the court its just not as useful to have slow footed inside players patrolling the paint.

  7. #232
    Delonte West fanclub pres lakerhaterade's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,673
    I disagree..Both the Heat and Thunder got the championship game with small ball. Granted they have Lebron and Durant to plug in at the 4, but small ball can most definatly be a strength with the right players. Lakers had the best inside players in the NBA over the last 2 seasons and got run off the court against smaller teams. I agree that Curry would make the spurs bigger, but it would also make them slower, which pop has gone away from over the past 2 seasons.
    But you can't beat the best two small ball teams at their game.

  8. #233
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    But you can't beat the best two small ball teams at their game.
    Really, you really think the spurs have a 0% chance of beating the Thunder if they meet again in the playoffs this season? I believe they have as much as a 50/50 chance of beating the Thunder after a full season together. So you believe with the help of Curry the spurs up there chances to win a le?

  9. #234
    Delonte West fanclub pres lakerhaterade's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,673
    Really, you really think the spurs have a 0% chance of beating the Thunder if they meet again in the playoffs this season? I believe they have as much as a 50/50 chance of beating the Thunder after a full season together. So you believe with the help of Curry the spurs up there chances to win a le?
    They don't have a 0 percent change. They have a chance, most definitely.

    They don't have a 50/50 chance after a full season together. You're happily ignoring the fact that this team will go through the grind of an 82-game season. There are going to be injuries, people are going to be tired by that end of the season. We are an old team.

    Having Curry could help le chances if he underwent a career renaissance, a scenario highly unlikely.

  10. #235
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    They don't have a 0 percent change. They have a chance, most definitely.

    They don't have a 50/50 chance after a full season together. You're happily ignoring the fact that this team will go through the grind of an 82-game season. There are going to be injuries, people are going to be tired by that end of the season. We are an old team.

    Having Curry could help le chances if he underwent a career renaissance, a scenario highly unlikely.
    OK, so what exactly is your point? So you believe there is greater chance of a possible championship with Curry cause his career renaissance is more likely than the spurs winning without him cause they will get injured and be to tired to contend...If you say so..

  11. #236
    Delonte West fanclub pres lakerhaterade's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,673
    My point is this is a no-win situation.

    Whether we have Curry or not, this team will still probably lose to the Lakers or Thunder. If we get lucky, we'll still lose to the Heat.

    To win, we must hire a scientist that will do lab work to reduce TD's age back to his mid-20's.

    i.e., we're ed.

  12. #237
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    My point is this is a no-win situation.

    Whether we have Curry or not, this team will still probably lose to the Lakers or Thunder. If we get lucky, we'll still lose to the Heat.

    To win, we must hire a scientist that will do lab work to reduce TD's age back to his mid-20's.
    Errr......that's the spirit!!

    i.e., we're ed.

  13. #238
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    OK, so what exactly is your point? So you believe there is greater chance of a possible championship with Curry cause his career renaissance is more likely than the spurs winning without him cause they will get injured and be to tired to contend...If you say so..
    No you idiot. the Spurs have no chance because their biggest offseason acquisition was De Cola. Diaw and Green were formalities and both were here when the Spurs went down to the Thunder. After 4 or 5 years, if the FO still doesn't get it that SIZE matters, then the fight is over before it begins. And NO, they won't get squat at the tradeline for Bonner or Blair.


    As far as beating the Thunder, unless Duncan and Ginobili show no regression, Parker has another career year and Leonard doesn't have a sop re setback, they won't be beating the Thunder. And there's no point in bringing up the putrid defense thus far.

  14. #239
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    I disagree..Both the Heat and Thunder got the championship game with small ball. Granted they have Lebron and Durant to plug in at the 4, but small ball can most definatly be a strength with the right players. Lakers had the best inside players in the NBA over the last 2 seasons and got run off the court against smaller teams. I agree that Curry would make the spurs bigger, but it would also make them slower, which pop has gone away from over the past 2 seasons. I also agree that you can beat teams on the inside, but in this day an age when touch fouls are called every time down the court its just not as useful to have slow footed inside players patrolling the paint.
    The Lakers have solved their small ball problems because DH is a more mobile big than Bynum.

  15. #240
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    I thought you guys wanted a return to defense.

    Pick a lane.
    But Powell's still on the team, right? Wasn't Curry better?

  16. #241
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    12,323
    The Suns waived Solomon Jones who is a defensive minded center, and waived Diogu too.

  17. #242
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Something not to forget about Spurs to analyze the Curry waiving is that they are really close to the luxury tax threshold. Spurs have little financial flexibility and they might want to keep it for later in the season. You can make a strong argument than staying with 14 players is the right move to do for Spurs for the moment.

    Now, if Spurs keep Powell, the waiving of Curry will be harder to justify.

  18. #243
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    No you idiot. the Spurs have no chance because their biggest offseason acquisition was De Cola. Diaw and Green were formalities and both were here when the Spurs went down to the Thunder. After 4 or 5 years, if the FO still doesn't get it that SIZE matters, then the fight is over before it begins. And NO, they won't get squat at the tradeline for Bonner or Blair.


    As far as beating the Thunder, unless Duncan and Ginobili show no regression, Parker has another career year and Leonard doesn't have a sop re setback, they won't be beating the Thunder. And there's no point in bringing up the putrid defense thus far.
    , you calling someone idiot...The spurs will always have a chance as long pop is on sideline with manu,tp, and td on his roster. Everyone knows they are getting older but to count out the spurs completely is beyond idiotic.

  19. #244
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    Emiliano Carchia ‏@SportandoBasket

    Lokomotiv Kuban signs former NBA Derrick Brown http://www.sportando.net/eng/europe/...ick-brown.html

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •