Reply With Quote
Obviously you were unhappy.
Why were you so unhappy?
Obviously you were unhappy.
Why were you so unhappy?
I voted for Obama.
But you're not black. Therefore, you couldn't be happy.
You're useless outside of snippets of pithy remarks. When you grow a pair and want to answer the question "why did Powell cry tears of joy when Obama won in 2008?" let me know.
I've never seen so many different people interject then cower in fear of a simple question.
You mean like how you cowered when you were asked?
I can't answer for another man.
You could answer for yourself, if you were a man.
I did answer.
You didn't say why you were unhappy. There's no way you could be happy because you're not black.
Your logic.
what ? maybe powell thought Obama was the better man to lead the country. once obama won powell creid because he never thougt in his life time that a man of color would win the Presidency. Since you can't answer your own question without guessing I will go with the above.
Powell cried tears of joy that the Reign of Error by the assholes in the WH he worked for was finally over.
Great let's move forward with this "man of color" thing.
Since Powell cried for that reason, it must be because a "man of color" did win the Presidency, which then stands to reason that Powell was happy to see that. That being the case, it stands to reason that Powell wanted Obama to win. That being the case, it stands to reason that at least part of the reason Powell voted for/endorsed Obama is because he was a "man of color".
No, your inability to argue effectively which leads to your little pithy remark tantrum. Your bad analogy is only overshadowed by your refusal to actually provide honest answers.
The rational mind can easily conclude that "happy" and "crying tears of joy" are on two completely different levels. I am happy to be alive. I cried tears of joy when my grandson was born. The first is just a state of satisfaction, but the second is a state of elation. The word "happy" gets falsely equivocated (as you have done) with "ecstatic" so that the reciprocal is sad. You can be content and not be overjoyed. Some people consider happy to mean content. Whatever makes you happy. I think you know damn well that Colin Powell cried because a milestone was reached in the black community. That milestone had to be on his mind during his decision to endorse Obama and during his vote. Otherwise you're suggesting it surprised him.
I answered quickly and honestly. That my answer made U mad is not my problem.
I'm suggesting you are completely free and seemingly eager to ascribe to Powell whatever your bias compels you to.The rational mind can easily conclude that "happy" and "crying tears of joy" are on two completely different levels. I am happy to be alive. I cried tears of joy when my grandson was born. The first is just a state of satisfaction, but the second is a state of elation. The word "happy" gets falsely equivocated (as you have done) with "ecstatic" so that the reciprocal is sad. You can be content and not be overjoyed. Some people consider happy to mean content. Whatever makes you happy. I think you know damn well that Colin Powell cried because a milestone was reached in the black community. That milestone had to be on his mind during his decision to endorse Obama and during his vote. Otherwise you're suggesting it surprised him.
You are free to be angry about its being pointed out by me to, as you are so clearly doing.
Neophyte debate tactic to claim your strawman upset the other person, as if your words hold that type of weight. You haven't said anything other than "why u mad" basically.
Ad hominemI'm suggesting you are completely free and seemingly eager to ascribe to Powell whatever your bias compels you to.
Begging the questionYou are free to be angry about its being pointed out by me to, as you are so clearly doing.
I know why U mad.
Nope. You showed your bias. I just recognized it.Ad hominem
It wasn't even a question. U really mad.Begging the question
I refuse to make this a WC/CD one liner 28 page fest. You cannot answer the question then just accept Gervin's answer as I have and move on.
Even if you don't admit it, you cannot honestly deny it. There's no alternative.
"once obama won powell creid because he never thougt in his life time that a man of color would win the Presidency."
That segue is perfect for my conclusion that I posted above. It has nothing to do with bias.
I already answered.
False premise. And straw man.Even if you don't admit it, you cannot honestly deny it. There's no alternative.
Repeating it doesn't make it so, mad boy."once obama won powell creid because he never thougt in his life time that a man of color would win the Presidency."
You are just one huge bundle of bias.That segue is perfect for my conclusion that I posted above. It has nothing to do with bias.
And you'll keep posting trying to defend it. Just accept you're horribly biased and get on with your life. There is no alternative.
Go for what?
Where are the revived threads?
This is a different topic, and I'm sure people don't with you to masterbait here too.
The links are right there in post #78 dip . Take us step by step on how wrong we all are.
And are you drinking again? that last sentence was neither original in terms of my conversations today nor very coherent.
Wow.
That's it?
I guess I shouldn't expect more from your pathetic ass. How pathetic must one be to assume "reviving" a thread is simply linking it? You want a go at it, then add to the thread. Quote a passage and remark on it. Ask a question or something in that thread.
You said to bring them up and i did. I am not going to spam the main board to satisfy your ego. It's sad that you will take any sort of attention even more universal rejection. Nor am I surprised by your cowardice.
It is incomprehensible how much a fool you are troll boy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions