Reply With Quote
Very interesting how much people identify with a le, label or a career. Interesting how someone like Funt was made out to be somehow- less pretentious in this thread.
Sure. Why would you get any degree if you weren't concerned about other people's opinions? Even job requirements are set based on opinions.
So you didn't actually say what I quoted you as saying. Got it. That really explains the " " in the " studies" course.About as odd as someone as thoroughly educated as yourself having such difficulties with reading comprehension.
You said his head would explode. Your head obviously didn't explode (maybe it grew a bit but still). I think the point was clear. Others saw that point just as clearly as did I.There's absolutely nowhere in that post you keep quoting in which I state or even suggest that the reason my friend wouldn't make it through the work I had to do was in any way related to his intelligence or lack thereof. Which you'd know if only you followed your own convoluted advice of scientifically sticking to the words I actually used, rather than paraphrasing, using hyperbole, and, through emotive jargon, assuming a point I never made in order to try and win your argument.
Perhaps you type too fast and in the process of doing so you were misinterpreted as saying something you didn't say, a condition in Studies known as the SAS Syndrome.
Very interesting how much people identify with a le, label or a career. Interesting how someone like Funt was made out to be somehow- less pretentious in this thread.
CF has simply been embarrassed by DMC tbh.
I wasn't trying to embarrass anyone and I doubt I did.
sbm, your le is metrosexual prison guard. Not sure what degree is required but it has to have something to do with studies.
Not entirely with him and much much less with your posturing.
Only a fool identifies himself/herself by some le or label and if you'd like to think in those ways go right ahead. It doesn't mean anything at all in the grand scheme of things - whatever le you hold dear- that is.
Only in a small way and most of it was because she, herself, also identifies with labels and les.
you don't have to sneer at others just because they have " ty" degrees compared to yours imho. their professions might not be very preferable in today's economy but you can't just say they didn't pay as much effort during their school years as you did
Shut up got. Go blow Avante.
No, but it's fun to watch all the old fat be@ners run to the rescue of a perceived lady in hopes of raising their chances of ever getting laid.
exactly, its often for the same reason those sissy bas s act anti-misogynist as a method of flattering females & increasing their chances to get free sex with them
Women are held to lower standards. If a man minored in Studies and mentioned it here he would be laughed out of the forum. When a woman does it it's cultural and necessary.
lmao engineer
you probably work at Walmart
I'm the guy you asked "where are the latex gloves?"
Lower? You certainly seem determined to create a hierarchy here.
Men are phobic to a much greater degree and identify wit men moreso than women. Men who show interest in sexuality are generally exposed to attempts at social control whereas women are not. That's not a hierarchy, it just is what it is. Sounds like you're a phobe though seeing your take on this though.
Woman majoring in a niche social studied is not viewed as 'necessary' and it's a cultutral issue by definition so it's inherently going to be viewed as such. Why do you have such emotional investment in ting on liberal arts?
^ another captain save-a-ho.
Probably because if he didn't have some paper to identify himself with he would not have anything else left.
Yeah i'm chasing amy... or it could be that multiple people are calling you on being a because you are. are you another troll of m<s? you two seem to have the same worldview.
If he did then that would be one thing but just as when he was namedropping Feynman, this is weak.
Let's see... Sbm and you. Sbm has a certificate from Los Buddies Greasy Spoon and Security Guard Training Service so that leaves you. Do you have a liberal arts degree?
Wasn't name dropping. I just agreed with his take. You're probably the biggest blowhard on the forums in terms of your "knowledge" as you routinely criticize WC for his education vs yours, hypocrite.
What difference does that make? Let me put it to you this way: harmonic analysis in both the continuous and discrete sense is easey peasey.
You have pretty much abandoned the premise of your argument and have resorted to the degree epeen nonsense that your argument was based off of in the first place. Is your entire objective only to denigrate an entire group of people in general?
Now i am sure that you have an ME or something. Lord knows I have read enough of your autoeroticism about it but now your are going after the idea of a liberal arts degree. Not even with remote specificity. it's not even zero sum. I realize that you are not even going to address what you are saying on merits. It's just oddly motivated behavior.
The two notions aren't mutually exclusive, lil peeps. it was clear what you were doing: even the venerable Feynman has contempt for your field of study. gmafb. You can hardly put together an argument on merit. That is obvious.
I never discuss my education in particular. I talk about topics and subjects that I am well versed but i don't ever sit there and compare my EE with anyone else's background. At the same time when the papers he is criticizing are basing their predictions on PDE's and he criticizes them then I think its pretty ing germane that he doesn't even know what a PDE is much less how to evaluate one.
There is a difference between understanding the background of an individual and where that puts him in relation to knowledge with the subject at hand and what you are doing. You are trying to make some weird hierarchy of worth with what you consider desirable fields of study and then everything else. I just think WC is an idiot.
I assume it's because DMC doesn't view art librarianship as a valuable or important career. By extension, the specific course of study to qualify me for such a career is an inherently frivolous exercise. From the start, his larger arguments that liberal arts degrees are a poor choice from a financial point of view, or that they don't lead to a career, or that they only appeal to lazy halfwits, has barely veiled the fact that he doesn't respect what I have chosen to do and that he doesn't respect me for having chosen to do it.
That, and the multicultural studies minor seems to really stick in his craw for some reason.
it's not at all a culture for females to take those humanity majors, it's just a trend in recent years when more and more females make their ways into colleges. women should never be given the access to school because a good woman's workshop is always in the kitchen and kitchen only. just because most females happen to choose majors like art, literature, history etc... and up these majors it doesn't mean those majors are naturally secondary imho. in the universities of the 19th century there were no such majors like finance, accounting, engineering etc...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions