the birther network
Where do you see mention of anything other than the words and actions of the white house and the details from that day that have been confirmed. You think I'm full of because: There isn't enough info from the white house to form an opinion? You don't think I am intelligent enough to put the pieces together? You are convinced that this is a non-story and the republicans are wallowing in the mud to disparage your guy?
are you a cracker for cain?
What do you think about Sean Hannity? You think he's a pretty cool dude? Be fun to split a case of bud with then go pants some s?
hey skippy can we wait until the investigation is over before we state that people lied and or tried to cover anything up?
Or should we rush to judgement in order to try and affect the election?
You seem very biased to me. This isn't that difficult. You can look at the details, words and actions we have from the white house. If you need more info to form an opinion then what else do you need to know? At the end of the day and the end of whatever investigation is being done if there is any wrongdoing by the President or his staff you will come back with Bush took us to Iraq or Bush is responsible for 911. For the die hard Obama supporters I'm sure they will agree with that stance. For those not so devoted it would probably make a difference.
Well to be fair to him he does have the most extensive election coverage on radio.. he does the job the msm won't do..
hey, watch out!!!!
What investigating are they doing? The guy that was caught we couldn't get access to. A request was made by Lindsey Graham not the president and now the FBI will interview him. We were told that we couldn't secure the consulate because it was too dangerous yet CNN and Fox were there. I get that you hate the right and that's fine. It doesn't mean you have to defend the left at every turn.
You left out the most obvious possibility.
Typical.
You already lied about your questions. It's pretty funny.
Mike...protip....this is not the time to double down.
Which possibility is that? I screwed up because the information never reached me. I screwed up because while the information reached me I failed to act. Either of those responses are fine. At least he could then lean forward and learn from it.
"the information reached me I failed to act."
Barry could have grabbed his AK47, hopped the Airforces's RamJet1 and got there in just few minutes, to go Rambo AND! Commando on all his co-religionists.
Nope, there is an obvious possible reason why you are full of that you haven't acknowledged.
Simply sending more security personnel when it was requested or maybe removing the American presence if he fealt he couldn't send additional security forces.
So now your back to questions before the fact.
Turns out you are full of .
I am full of because I think Obama is our modern version of the emperor's new clothes and you find him to be the greatest leader of our time? Close your eyes if you want but you have not begun to offer anything remotely resembling an argument. Typical to resort to name calling and insults. With the lack of truth on your side there isn't much you have left.
Your a proponent of gathering information. That information would include what was known before the incident, during the incident and after the incident. The problem for you is that it paints a picture you don't like. Not because it resulted in the death of Americans but because it paints your guy negatively. As I said before hate fox, the tea party, bush, white people, rich people, wall street etc. etc. you can still have your hate. Your lack of any acknowledement that maybe the president might have screwed up a little bit shows how full of you are.
Drone was not armed, as noted. Standard recon, but no weaps.
I am under no obligation to form an argument. I've read the report, and it is what it is. I'm content to let the investigations run their courses. It probably won't be to team red's liking -- you and they think this could sink his re-election chances and are holding out that hope like a life preserver. Your great hope is you find some kind of smoking gun showing Obama wanted to kill his own ambassador or something similar by Tuesday.
You came at this completely full of bias then pretended you didn't. You asked questions about Obama's actions before the attack then needlessly lied about doing so in an attempt to make yourself seem less biased. You kicked your own ass and proved yourself to be a liar. You ruined your own credibility trying to bolster it. I find that hilarious.
The problem for you is you are biased and lie for no good reason.
I certainly allow for error on the president's part. You lie about that because you are trying to justify your own lies.
There is the burn.
There is a gulf between asking questions that should be asked, and asking "are you stupid, or just ignorant" just to get someone in some stupid partisan "gotcha".
Quite frankly, if one starts looking at the assumptions underpinning this whole push for an investigation, it becomes a lot more clear.
"cover up" implies something to cover up in the first place. Proving incompetence, and a deliberate attempt to conceal that, are the first legs in that triad, and people without a pre-existing narrative to shoe-horn this into are having a hard time seeing the conspiracy.
It is quite possible in intelligence work, to do everything right, and still miss .
If you want to talk about logic, you have set up a false dichotomy and excluded other potential explanations that do not involve cover-ups.
Instead what you have is simply a "begging the question" logical fallacy, in which the conclusions you want to reach are simply assumed to be true, and then you go from there.
Is that the rode you want to go down?
How does looking at Obama's actions before, during or after the attack cons ute bias? Their his actions, his words. I assume that when Carney, Rice or Biden speak they are echoing whatever message the POTUS wants out there. The arguments put forth have ranged from well the republicans did the same thing to I am a biased liar. For my own entertainment what do I have to gain by lying?
I am waiting for the "we don't have evidence of a cover-up because they are covering it up" ala 9-11 twoofer nutterism. GMAFB.
I would not say you are lying. I would ask for a bit more than your word, or that of Fox "news" before jumping on the bandwagon.
Please tell me how you have examined the available evidence and excluded plausible explanations that do not include "coverups".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
