The world will get ted on if Romney wins....so your right
The world will get ted on if Romney wins....so your right
Gtown, bringing the political forum bads per par.
Silver will either be a genius or a a hack -- have to wait for the results.
pretty much
wouldn't the correct term be shat?
he still has 2 days to adjust his numbers.
lol but you have downs
your ****** wife is cuckolding you
The Democrats thought he was a hack too, until he predicted they'd lose big in 2010.....
lol meltdown
republicans ting their pants like crazy lately![]()
Sooo... do the neocons have a better statistical method than Silver uses? If so, what the are you all doing on here instead of making bank?![]()
lol hardcore repubs like darrinS and wild cobra
Romney's campaign will not be dictated by fact checkers!
lol your obvious meltdown
lol nate silve is a hack
lol meltdown
Isn't the past tense of "shat"? I mean if you are using as a verb and use it in the past tense, then I'm pretty sure it's shat. ted just doesn't sound right. It's like when people say "cutted" or "hitted".
Sounds like somebody forgot their medication today. Poor Gtown.
Maybe collectively you all can accomplish what none of you ever could individually. Quick, everyone band together like transformers and form LibTron!
considering election day as an at bat, these aren't bad chances:
http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/co...tractId=743475
Is intrade something more than a popularity contest based on those with disposable income?
The le change doesn't make much sense. OP has disclosed, whether voluntary or not, why he disagrees with Silver. If Silver used the exact same statistical methods and was predicting Romney as the 85% favorite, he'd be toting how reliable Silver is like, just like boutons does.
it isn't. just pointing out Romney's chances are well north of negligible.Is intrade something more than a popularity contest based on those with disposable income?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)