Reply With Quote
if only RNC hasn't pissed off Ron Paul supporters!
Finally counted:
Obama Wins Florida
if only RNC hasn't pissed off Ron Paul supporters!
We all know you are an authoritarian little , so I don't expect you to understand the cons utional values Paul brings to the table.if only RNC hasn't pissed off Ron Paul supporters!
SA210 posted this in another thread:
Consider the numbers in Florida for example. By this tally, Obama won by 46,039 votes. There were more than twice as many who voted for Paul in the republican primary. 117,100 of them. If the RNC had allowed the process to go on properly, and if Paul had said "we new need to support Romney" after he lost the caucus, then Romney might have won.
"cons utional values Paul brings to the table."
He's scary old with deregulatory campaign that trusts corps to self-regulate, just another destructive fantasy in his imagined wonderland of fantasies.
How do you know those 117,100 didn't vote for Romney?
Nvm, I thought it was talking about Ron Paul winning the election instead if it were not for Mitt Romney. Regardless, the table is flawed. The people who voted for Ron Paul could have voted for Mitt Romney in this election.
Last edited by kamikazi_player; 11-10-2012 at 08:03 PM.
Wow, that's the stupidest table I've seen in quite some time.
Makes sense when you see who posted and reposted it.
Idiot.
You obviously need to look up the definition of the word "IF."
So you don't know. Okay.
Lol @ liberty factor
Exactly. My using the word IF should be enough, shouldn't it? Please explain how you assume it as me saying it factually made the difference?
Please...
This explanation should be good, because the only explanation I see is your chronic assumptions. Your bias of me, constantly thinking I say things I don't say. Only seeing things through your biased glasses. It gets pretty frustrating, you know...
You're almost as bad as The Fuzzy Troll.
Gary Johnson got a little over 1 million votes so if Romney could have gotten some of Gary Johnson's votes and a lot of votes from Ron Paul supporters then he might have won but Romney and the GOP told Ron Paul to off so that's that.
And how do you know all those Romney people would have voted for Ron Paul?
Exactly. Many of those voters did vote for Romney.
So that table could be onto something, or could be absolute bull . You just don't know, right?
they wouldn't... People that voted for Romney already know Ron Paul is unelectable
Correct. It has merit as a possibility. Only a possibility. No way to factually know.
It has as much merit being bull . Correct?
Really? Then why did they have to change the game midstream at then RNC?
you need to make up your mind. If your su ion is that Ron Paul supporters didn't vote for Romney, that makes people that voted for Romney not Ron Paul supporters.
Most these same people I think would have still voted republican.
Don't you get it? It's ethics and principle. The RNC ed over one of their own.
Actually, forget it. I know you don't understand ethics or principle. Silly me for bringing it up.
Very weak argument about Ron Paul voters. It would be like Democrats claiming that Obama would have won in a bigger landslide if he could have gotten John Kerry's 50 million or so votes from 2004. Obviously most overlap, as do Ron Paul and Mitt Romney voters.
Democrats were split in 2004 between Clinton and Obama, but they managed to widen the umbrella for supporters of both candidates...but the GOP is so ideologically driven....nobody wants to compromise on this principle or that principle..
I get it. You said something stupid like "If the RNC had allowed the process to go on properly, and if Paul had said "we new need to support Romney" after he lost the caucus, then Romney might have won." And now you are trying to obfuscate your typical stupidity by talking about ethics and other bull .
What were the two if's? Oh yeah They were 'if Ron would have told the voters to vote for Romney' or 'if the GOP wouldn't have ed them over in the first place. The 'if' was NOT 'if they had not voted for Romney' as your conditions are conditions to get them to vote for Romney. You may want to turn attention away from your premise and onto your conditions but your premise as usual was stupid.
You should just do us all a favor and punch yourself in the face.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
