Reply With Quote
It's not invasion of Iraq incompetence, but sure. They made an erroneous call with all the necessary caveats. Conspiracy nuts like you couldn't possibly take that as a possibility.
Are you sure it wasn't reported, Mr. Tinfoil Hat?
It's not invasion of Iraq incompetence, but sure. They made an erroneous call with all the necessary caveats. Conspiracy nuts like you couldn't possibly take that as a possibility.
If it was said then CNN, NBC, and CBS didn't report it. Did you and Boutons blogs get the scoop?
LOL I'm hardly a conspiracy nut, but I firmly believe that Obama is not above lying directly to the face of the public if it benefits him politically. All he had to do was convince the stupidest 51%.
Are those the only major news outlets in the world?
Of course you areSo you are part of the stupidest 51% when your guy wins.but I firmly believe that Obama is not above lying directly to the face of the public if it benefits him politically. All he had to do was convince the stupidest 51%.
They are definitely blue team outlets. If they had something that bolstered Obama they would definitely report it.
It's hilarious that you can't answer simple yes or no questions.
Classic twooferism.
The correct answer is "no."
What yes or no question?
It's hilarious that you are such a little straw .
"In the Line of Booty?" 10 Funniest Headlines from the Petraeus Sex Scandal
http://www.alternet.org/line-booty-1...us-sex-scandal
I have, sadly, little doubt that if the Republicans in the House of Representatives thought there was some political advantage in having closed door hearings on whether or not the moon landings were faked, they would do so.
You calling it a "coverup" doesn't make it so, any more than NASA "covered up" the hoaxed landings.
Is it possible to have a Congressional hearing on something and that topic not be a "coverup"?
If you like, I can provide a sad, sad list of congressional hearings that did nothing, learned nothing, but were very obviously crassly politically motivated bull by one party or another, seeking some sort of publicity, or fake outrage. How would I be able to tell the difference between a "coverup" and this kind of hearing?
Well, we already know that the White House knew on day one it was a terrorist attack by an Al Quaeda affiliate. What would you call almost 2 weeks of "it was a spontaneous demonstration about the movie"? Seriously. Take your blue glasses off for a minute.
Take your red glasses off.
I would not expect any administration to have all the information on day one.
I would expect a lot of conflicting intel.
I would expect an administration of either party to be more than a little hesitant to state something as "certain" in such an environment.
"knowing" and being able to support that with solid information are two separate things. I would expect a responsible government to be a bit leery of revealing too much that might compromise classified sources.
I really don't give a squirt of if it took them a couple of weeks or even a month to sort it out, given the situation on the ground in Libya at the moment.
I have little doubt that if the Obama administration had gotten everything out and all the initial reports turned out 100% right, people like you would be ing about endangering intelligence sources by revealing too much.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 11-16-2012 at 05:50 PM. Reason: deep breath.
You are right. first, second day is completely OK to say "no comment, we are still gathering the facts". That's not what they said. They planned and planted a false narrative that they stuck to till the bitter end (almost two weeks later) when it blew into a million pieces. That's not red lens interpretation, that's clear lens interpretation.
most likely Obama and his cohorts were doing everything not to blow the election. It's all common sense. They got the major players to buy into a stupid spontaneous theory even when they knew better. It's sad to see the usual partisans swallowing every drop of Obama but that's per par around here. I do wonder though if there was something else going on in Benghazi, like rumors of another CIA secret prison etc...That would be real interesting, but I doubt most of the media gives a .
You are right. first, second day is completely OK to say "no comment, we are still gathering the facts". That's not what they said. They planned and planted a false narrative that they stuck to till the bitter end (almost two weeks later) when it blew into a million pieces. That's not red lens interpretation, that's clear lens interpretation.
Sorry, that's pure twoofer revisionism.
You are right. first, second day is completely OK to say "no comment, we are still gathering the facts". That's not what they said. They planned and planted a false narrative that they stuck to till the bitter end (almost two weeks later) when it blew into a million pieces. That's not red lens interpretation, that's clear lens interpretation.
You're to emotionally committed now to even answer a simple question about major media outlets You deserve nothing but ridicule.
Apparently, BHO and Susan rice did...
Twoofer revisionism?facts are facts.
And you can GFY and your major media outlet question...I answered it. The blue ones didn't cover it so it didn't happen.
Me ridicule? LMAO You pathetic piece of internet . I have total disdain for your internet persona.
You believe that.
That's why you aren't respected much around here.
You left out very important facts to fit your narrative.Twoofer revisionism?
Twoofer style.
You ignored actual major news sources so your bias could be confirmed.And you can GFY and your major media outlet question...I answered it. The blue ones didn't cover it so it didn't happen.
Twoofer style.
Angry ad hominem when called out.Me ridicule? LMAO You pathetic piece of internet . I have total disdain for you internet persona.
Twoofer style.
LMAO
post your ing sources . Prove your premise that Petraeus said things that exonerated Obama that wasn't reported by the mainstream media.
BTW I'm not going to respond tonight because unlike you I actually have a real life outside the internet and am about to cruise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
