Reply With Quote
It certainly wouldn't have been anyone in the intelligence community. They had such conclusive proof instantly after the event that they had to be silenced by the political operatives at the white house.
I know, I was just going for the funny, and not really all that well, either. (sigh) Not one of my better bits.
It certainly wouldn't have been anyone in the intelligence community. They had such conclusive proof instantly after the event that they had to be silenced by the political operatives at the white house.
Yes, I'm sure Lindsey Graham would have been totally okay with there being no information given 5 days after the attacks. That wouldn't have been a political firestorm at all.
"The White House hasn't come to any conclusions? They must not have anything conclusive. We'll give them the benefit of the doubt." - Said no opposition party politician, ever.
Be careful you may confuse him again.
There was a classified version and an unclassified version. The classified called it a terrorist attack. The unclassified version called it a riot over a movie gone bad. Susan Rice gave the unclassified version to the media. As Ambassador to the UN she would have had the security clearance to read the classified version. Did she? I sure don't know. I do know that when the dumb ass press secretary Carney at the White House was still calling it a riot over a movie ten days later they HAD to know by then it was a lie.
So you wanted them all to disclose classified information to the public?
L
O
L
That's OK. Republicans did that for them.
Did I say that ankle biter? Nope. Just saying that she had the means to know she was telling a big fat lie. Don't know if she actually knew that Sunday Morning but Jay Carney damn well knew ten days later when he was trying to sell the same line of .
So you are you only wanted Carney to disclose classified information.
OK.
Keep trying to bite Obama's ankle. Does it make you feel better?
@ you calling the fact that terrorists killed the Ambassador "classified information"
You are SUCH a ****.
What did she say in entirety and not just CC's lame characterization? All I get from it is that there was multiple intelligence sources giving conflicting reports that were --as usual-- slow to disseminate their information amongst themselves to come to a conclusion.
Classified versus unclassified has little import to me over WHO was saying what and when. Was it the CIA, DoD, DoS, NSA, or what? CC is just fluffing his GOP overlords as is typical.
No, I'm just using my own critical thinking brain, .
Talk about sticking to talking points...
You are moving the goalposts so much it's difficult to keep track of what your actual conspiracy is now.
You are SUCH a ****.
Do you remember who approved the talking points?
Do you remember what your original conspiracy theory was concerning one of those who approved the talking points?
lol critical thinking brain
Sum up what your conspiracy theory is now please. Your story has changed a lot.
If by 'critical thinking' you mean literally parroting GOP characterizations of what she said rather than referring to what she said then I agree.No, I'm just using my own critical thinking brain, .
Talk about sticking to talking points...
As chump said you are all over the place. You suck at sophistry too.
Honest question here, not laying a trap, not trying to troll anyone...how does this story have any affect on the daily lives of Americans in any meaningful way? If I'm correct, the government in general (regardless of political party) has a history of spreading disinformation when it is convenient for them (for whatever reasons)...what makes THIS story so special?
I will sum it up for you Chump.
A bunch of people lied.
Finding out who lied when, where, and how is pretty much impossible at this point.
you can keep calling it a conspiracy theory and demanding proof from someone that's not in a position to supply it all you want.
If you actually believe all the they fed you on face value you are even dumber than i thought.
I will sum it up as well: you have nothing to substantiate what you are claiming. You have no basis to believe that other than you being told to by your GOP overlords.
Can you even say who lied about what? I will channel chump here as well: be specific.
The Republicans think they have an issue they can ride for a couple of months that includes a little Obama-is-a-secret-Muslim innuendo if some want to ride with that.
i call your bull a conspiracy theory precisely because you can't prove it.
You would actually prefer not to know anything more at this point since the information that has come out took a huge all over you when you had your big mouth open. You've been backtracking ever since but are still managing to be a whiny about it.
Get back on the porch little puppy.
So you cannot. that's nice.
Nope, I already owned you lock, stock, and barrel in the other thread. Not wasting any more time on stupid puppies.
lol CC's stealing WC's "waste my time" shtick and conspiracy puppies.
It's important!
Nothing you said even remotely addressed what you quoted. Instead, you offered up a "you too" defense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions