Reply With Quote
Luck is doing things a rookie QB has never done. What's your point?
Tbh the Lions arent as ty as their record suggests. Thier schedule has been pretty brutal thus far and they have been compe ive in pretty mich evert game.
Luck is doing things a rookie QB has never done. What's your point?
Funny how Avante criticizes the Lions as a bad team yet Seattle and Russell Wilson went up there and lost
Wasted keystroked here tbh. Avante's already repeated his talking point about Luck's unimpressive game/Wilson's impressive game a couple times. I think he's done posting for the evening.Funny how Avante criticizes the Lions as a bad team yet Seattle and Russell Wilson went up there and lost
Acting like Luck is the sole reason Indy has 8 wins is re ed. So is acting like Watt wouldn't have an impact on the Colts. It implies Luck is the only reason for their success. That's what I was pointing out to DD.
How were the Colts last year without Luck?
They were very successful tanking the season without him.
So without Luck they're a team of quitters. Got it.
Great cop out answer.
Do you think the Colts are 8-4 or better with JJ Watt (who I think is a very good player and probably a draw so far with Von Miller for DPOY) instead of Luck?
Whatever Texanfan has to say to this, I'm sure it won't be a direct answer.
If the Colts offered to trade Luck for Wilson straight up, how long do you think Seattle would take to accept? One minute or two?
The deal would be done before one of their freaknig defensive players could pop another adderall.
Lol why is it hard to believe teams tanks? Especially when it's so obvious.
In 2010, they were kicking ass, first in their divison, and made the playoffs. Now in 2011, with a pretty similar roster from 2010, with basically the same core of backs and WRs all of the sudden go 2 and 14??? Lost what? 13 in a row? Even losing to the crappy Jaguars? Lmao get the outta here with that and take your white tinted glasses with you.
yeah you're right, it's a total in mystery how they went from 10-6 to 2-14. It's not like they had a franchise QB in 2010 who didn't play a single game in 2011 because of a neck injury or anything.
That's EXACTLY how they want you to think. Perfect timing to tank the season. I refuse to believe that the Colt's roster is so horrible and unable to adjust without Manning. No ing way.
That's it, the drop off from the 2010 to 2011 Colts is one big Aryan Brotherhood conspiracy!!! They want you to believe propoganda that losing one of the top 3 QBs of all time can cause a huge drop off in how a team plays.
It's not like the Dolphins saw a huge drop off after losing Marino.
It's not liek the Cowboys saw a huge drop off when they lost Aikman.
It's not like the broncos saw a huge drop off when they lost Elway.
The Colts seeing a huge drop off without Manning is just a neo-Nazi conspiracy to prop up Andrew Luck! They're trying to INDOCTRINATE you with the white supremacist agenda by making you think losing a franchise QB makes a team play a lot worse!
Nope, the drops without those quarterbacks you mentioned were nowhere near as atrocious as the 2010 Colts. , Miami placed first after Marino left.
If Peyton was so crucial to the Colts like that, then why cut him? They were worried about Peyton's neck boo boo?
ROTY is for RG3 to lose. Luck won't be snatching . It would be handed to him if it goes that way.
As of right now it's...
RGIII
Russell Wilson
Andrew Luck
...not even debatable. Luck is the 29 rated QB.
29 A. Luck (Ind) 255 449 56.8 3,205 7.1 291.4 13 13 26 76.7 30 M. Sanchez (NYJ) 194 350 55.4 2,339 6.7 212.6 12 10 26 75.6 31 R. Tannehill (Mia) 197 334 59.0 2,373 7.1 215.7 7 12 20 72.9 32 B. Weeden (Cle) 222 397 55.9 2,456 6.2 223.3 12 13 20 70.9 33 M. Cassel (KC) 161 277 58.1 1,796 6.5 199.6 6 12 19 66.7 34 J. Skelton (Ari) 98 179 54.7 1,058 5.9 176.3 2 5 14 64.4
Jesus dude stop quoting those stats...that was before today.
Paste
Last updated on Sunday, Dec 2, 2012 6:06 am EST
Totally current, he's not having the kind of season people think he is.
RGIII and Russell Wilson really are having the better season.
None of those QBs had a supporting cast as ty as Peyton had, and none of those QBs were replaced by QBs as bad as the trio of Collins/Orlovsky/Painter. You're also revising history by calling the 2010 Colts a good team. They wouldn't have made the playoffs had they not been in a division and tey needed Peyton to do everything. It was pretty much a consensus among non-re ed people Peyton's supporting cast in 2010 was horrible and without Peyton would have been in a compe ion for worst team in the NFL. 2010 was the first time since 2002 that Peyton couldn't lead the Colts to 12 or more wins. It was obvious to people who remember how weak the 2010 team was.
Because his supporting cast was so ty they knew it would be better to rebuild and yes, you can call it a neck boo boo since you think that label changes something, but they didn't wanna pay him the gigantic bonus he had coming given that he was dealing with a career threatening neck injury.
No, it's not totally current you inbred mongoloid.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/gamelo...74/andrew-luck
They haven't adjusted the totals to reflect today's game. Add up the touchdowns from each game. He had 13 touchdowns entering today and now has 17 total. For such a betting expert you struggle with basic arithmetic.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
