Reply With Quote
According to the OT it's not only ok but was widely practiced. Father Abraham was a daughter ing old goat.
http://www.timescolonist.com/news/Fa...104/story.html
How this injustice still happens
According to the OT it's not only ok but was widely practiced. Father Abraham was a daughter ing old goat.
Hartford told police she aspired to be a porn star before she got pregnant, according to arrest warrant affidavits.Dream big baby!
So does the kid call him daddy or grandpa?
I don't care what the OT says jeebus lover
Yes.
Felony? I thought the northeast was a little more liberal than that. Guess not.2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-191. Incest: Class D felony.
View Current Version
Sec. 53a-191. Incest: Class D felony. (a) A person is guilty of incest when he marries a person whom he knows to be related to him within any of the degrees of kindred specified in section 46b-21.
(b) Incest is a class D felony.
http://law.justia.com/codes/connecti...ec53a-191.html
sucks but i don't see how it becomes a crime tbh. doesn't the government have anything more important to deal with other than intervene in trivial issues such as gay marriage and incest?
he probably a brain dead mother er like most imbred kids imho
how ed up to find out you've ed and had a kid with your dad
BARF!
they could get together with the ladies from that thread in the club and star in a movie that plays this song the entire time on a loop:
lol might be her father
Exactly my thought...
He did claim that his brother might be her father ...
Oh, that makes everything OK.
No, but notice how the quoted law said "married."
Non Sequitur Theater presents:
I'm just wondering what crime they committed by the state they are in. The above quoted law does not apply.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Read the goddamn article.
I'll make it easier for him:
Now, I'm not sure if the first two are related to the whole "sleeping with your family" deal, but the third isn't.George Sayers Jr. and Tiffany Hartford, of Bethel in western Connecticut, were charged Monday with third-degree sexual assault, obscenity and conspiracy after authorities said DNA tests showed Sayers was the father of both Hartford and her baby. Each pleaded not guilty and was being held on bail.
I was assuming Blake pulled out the law they were using.
My mistake for believing Blake.
Now I see their argument.Sec. 53a-72a. Sexual assault in the third degree: Class D or C felony. (a) A person is guilty of sexual assault in the third degree when such person (1) compels another person to submit to sexual contact (A) by the use of force against such other person or a third person, or (B) by the threat of use of force against such other person or against a third person, which reasonably causes such other person to fear physical injury to himself or herself or a third person, or (2) engages in sexual intercourse with another person whom the actor knows to be related to him or her within any of the degrees of kindred specified in section 46b-21.
What's Roger Clinton have to do with this?
I don't know what it is, but WC managed to politicize another apolitical story.
I mean this George Sayers Jr. must be another hillbilly relative.
Well, if you take the letter of the law, you must then also prove that these two knew with certainty they were related. The case will be based about it, and I couldn't help but think of Clinton's testimony about the definition of "is."
Besides, correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the political forum...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
