Reply With Quote
all the ones I read about on Drudge Report
Which problems in particular?
all the ones I read about on Drudge Report
Which are?
People need to realize that evil is real and exists in this world. If someone goes over the edge and wants to do violent acts toward others, that person will do whatever it takes to make it happen. Stopping them is the only thing someone can do to prevent mass violence and death.
but seriously, no matter how good, responsible, normal, a kid or young adult is, I'm not giving them access to guns.
Bat weirdness, autism, possible genius re ation syndrome, gothicaitis, etc.
Hmm. Worked for the 14 year old in Arizona.
No easy answers imo.
He had over 70,000 posts on an obscure, sports-related forum.
That's a word?
Examples of the bat weirdness?
What a relief.
This one isn't obscure.
no easy answers. but controlling access to your own guns is a good start to making sure your guns don't get used in a mass killing
I may have misspellled it.
No .
Just seems like a lot of folks want to blame the mother because, well, gotta blame someone. I want to know their reasoning.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/nation...9_story_1.htmlLanza had no social media footprint — not even a Facebook page.
It's fun what can be learned from Darrin's failures.
Never meant to blame the mother for her son's sins. No matter how ed up a parent is (or is not), I never bought the daddy/mommy-issues criminals cop to when explaining their maladjustment.
well then if i go hunting and bring something home, i will bring it to you for processing (especially since that is the missing link in this whole plan (my wife doesn't like gamey taste)).
Why?? Who's to decide the regulations? A bunch or morons who can't even spend less than what they collect?
Who pays for it? Me? I have to pay to protect my family? Who is going to train me, or decide if I am able to carry a piece of equipment I paid for?
Maybe you should read up on what wild hogs are doing to South Texas' agriculture and eco system.
Seriously?
Why make any laws at all then?Who's to decide the regulations? A bunch or morons who can't even spend less than what they collect?
lol it's always about taking money away isn't it? Why aren't you outraged at all of the things that cost millions or billions more than tougher gun laws? Like the wars we're involved in. At least gun laws would ENHANCE safety, unlike the wars.Who pays for it? Me? I have to pay to protect my family? Who is going to train me, or decide if I am able to carry a piece of equipment I paid for?
Yes
Are the laws in reaction to the school shooting, where the son stole the weapons? Where he didn't use an automatic weapon? If it's to not waste a crisis then I would say that it violates the cons ution. If it's just to get less weapons off the streets from criminals, I would say they would still get them. If it's because the idea that a private citizen who has an automatic rifle in his car scares you, I'd say tough .Why make any laws at all then?
[/quote]lol it's always about taking money away isn't it? Why aren't you outraged at all of the things that cost millions or billions more than tougher gun laws? Like the wars we're involved in. At least gun laws would ENHANCE safety, unlike the wars.
How do you know what outrages me? You're assuming because I take one stance on a topic, I must fit into your preconcieved notion of everyone who believes like me, with the range of pro-gun people all included into one nice neat box. Also what statistics are you refering to when you say that gun laws enhance safety?
Are you saying that we are less safe with OBL and Saddam dead. Or that we just pissed off more people that we created more terrorists? Or are both wrong and you meant something entirely different?
...to make it harder for people to acquire deadly weapons. Am I in the wrong thread?
Tough haha tell that to those dead children and the countless others murdered by semi-auto or automatic weapons.Are the laws in reaction to the school shooting, where the son stole the weapons? Where he didn't use an automatic weapon? If it's to not waste a crisis then I would say that it violates the cons ution. If it's just to get less weapons off the streets from criminals, I would say they would still get them. If it's because the idea that a private citizen who has an automatic rifle in his car scares you, I'd say tough .
Wait let me get this straight. So you think gun laws either do nothing or have deleterious effects on safety? Is that correct? And I'm assuming you're not outraged at other things because that's all I can do, assume, until you tell me otherwise. We are equally or less safe with Saddam dead yes. How many millions did our country alienate by invading a country on false pretenses? Remember the Gulf of Tonkin? Millions of Vietnamese do.How do you know what outrages me? You're assuming because I take one stance on a topic, I must fit into your preconcieved notion of everyone who believes like me, with the range of pro-gun people all included into one nice neat box. Also what statistics are you refering to when you say that gun laws enhance safety?
Are you saying that we are less safe with OBL and Saddam dead. Or that we just pissed off more people that we created more terrorists? Or are both wrong and you meant something entirely different?
Children of all races always respond well to President Obama. How children act around a stranger tells you as much about the stranger as about the children themselves. I love how comfortable little children are with our president. He is such a good man, and if we aren't, WE SHOULD BE so proud to have a person like him as our president.
What a precious picture..It goes to show that racists aren't born they are bred....Stop the madness folks
I didn't realize weapons shoot on their own. I completely change my position.
Vietnam...from gun safety to vietnam. I guess its your honest answer so ok. I also don't really want to just list things that make me outraged. Seems silly. Like I would be doing it on a dare. But to the gun laws... I don't think outlawing automatic weapons made us more safe and letting the law expire made us less safe. I don't think that all the cities who made laws against handguns made them any more safe and in fact made them less safe. Now the federal law of comitting a crime using a shotgun made us as citizens safer. Coupled with the fact that there is not much of a parole system for that.Wait let me get this straight. So you think gun laws either do nothing or have deleterious effects on safety? Is that correct? And I'm assuming you're not outraged at other things because that's all I can do, assume, until you tell me otherwise. We are equally or less safe with Saddam dead yes. How many millions did our country alienate by invading a country on false pretenses? Remember the Gulf of Tonkin? Millions of Vietnamese do.
Mitt would probably pat them on the head while cautiously making sure they didn't dirty up his shirt or scuff his shoes.Children of all races always respond well to President Obama. How children act around a stranger tells you as much about the stranger as about the children themselves. I love how comfortable little children are with our president. He is such a good man, and if we aren't, WE SHOULD BE so proud to have a person like him as our president.
What a precious picture..It goes to show that racists aren't born they are bred....Stop the madness folks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions