Reply With Quote
It doesn't seem like too much to me. I have at times advocated the death penalty for first degree crimes against other people.
Does that seem like a lot to you? He probably helped her exposure tbh
It doesn't seem like too much to me. I have at times advocated the death penalty for first degree crimes against other people.
All he probably did was increase her exposure tbh
You've also advocated the death penalty for poor desperate Mexicans trying to cross the border.
Freak.
If true, yes, that's too much time.
Does that seem like a lot to you? He probably helped her exposure tbh
6 months probation, internet monitoring + large civil payout to Scarlett should have been the max penalty, imo.
seems like a of a lot when there are rapists and killer drunk drivers that get out quicker.
Does that seem like a lot to you? He probably helped her exposure tbh
It wasn't just her phone that he hacked. One report said in addition to her and a couple other celebs whose phones or e-mails he hacked he hit another 50 non-celebrity folks. I don't know how much damage he went on to do with the information obtained by doing so, but for a crime of that scope jail time is well deserved.
This guy needs a statue for giving the world a look at that glorious rack
But yeah, he hacked a load of other people so the punishment does fit the crime
maybe so than...I didn't read the story...
I just checked this thread for some pics
white collar crime, he gon go ta min security n prolly get released after 6-12 months. Courts just scaring him probably
I think it's fitting. Cybercrime is still crime. It's not like he hacked into her WoW account and stole her goodies.
O rlly?
Rape in California: 3, 6 or 8 years.
Add up to five more if severe bodily damage was done.
Either 10 is too much jail time for a hacker looking at and passing on naked pictures or 13 for rape is not enough.
13 for rape is not enough, rape can be worse than murder imo. Heaps of raped girls wished they were dead, living with that would be so bad
I dont think this help her exposure any. She was already a stablished actress. All this did was let us (the public) look at them beautiful, well sculpted work of art.
Yeah I was just trying to find excuses because I wanted to defend him for letting me see such things
judge must be gay or a woman tbh
but who is to take responsibility for uploading those nude pics to her computer or email box, or any other place only to make the pics accessible to hackers? the hacker didn't infiltrate into her room nor did he ambush in her bathroom to catch a pic of her private spot while she was pissing, so its no legit crime. female celebrities are just glorified pros utes tbh
WC loves him some death penalty.
Its invasion of privacy.
Its no different than accesing something you're not supposed to have access to. Its clearly a crime.
By your logic, porn hackers or even hackers who hack into the goverment computers and whatnot are free to do so because its no legit crime? Something's not right with that.
LMAO hacking some es phone = 10 years in prison. you liberals are some re ed ing characters. he should get like 50 hours of community service.
Yeah this should have a minor criminal penalty and any further action should be civil brought forth by Johansson if she felt like a victim.
People need to start thinking about these non-violent crimes from a fiscal standpoint. Do you as a taxpayer want to pay 10 years of incarceration costs for a in computer hacker?
where the did the "this thread is worthless without pics" smiley go?
Something tells me she did feel like a victim since she contacted the FBI herself. lol
And I think these 10 years were ac ulative from all the other hack jobs he had done prior or since.
Punishment fits the crime imo. If re didnt learn his lesson the first time he should be locked up on common sense alone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
