Reply With Quote
How bout when the psychos start using something besides semi-automatic-handguns and assault rifles, THEN we'll discuss banning those as well.
For now, lets stick with whats actually being used to slaughter school children and movie-goers, yes?
You are a ing idiot.
Semi- is a Latin prefix to a verb, noun, or adjective meaning "half"
Semi-automatic means "half automatic". Meaning you dont have to manually load another round into the chamber. Thus, revolvers are also considered "semis" even though they have less moving parts.
Again, though. I dont care.
Ban. Them. All.
How bout when the psychos start using something besides semi-automatic-handguns and assault rifles, THEN we'll discuss banning those as well.
For now, lets stick with whats actually being used to slaughter school children and movie-goers, yes?
Prove that with something other than ad nauseum claims.
I've showed you differently.
Obviously you care.
We know what you didn't do in the military, that's for sure.
The AR15.
The Glock can be moved quicker. Less mass...
No. When you get your terminology and facts straight we can actually have a meaningful discussion. Until then you're just engaging in ignorant ranting.
I really dont.
Like i said, lets start by banning the guns being used to slaughter school children. When they switch to something else, we'll ban those too.
You crazy ers still in here arguing over this ...it' not that serious fellas..drop it...none of you are that important anyway...I declare the winner of this debate whomever the majority decides...
No, you're powerless to do anything, just like your team.
Let start by banning all assault weapons.
Hers a definition for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon
wait...is this like my Brazilian thing? you can't be that stupid.
Again, "assault rifle" means full auto. The terminology used for semiautomatic military looking rifles is "assault weapon."
Weapon. Not rifle.
There's been no debate, just reality 101 and I am the professor.
Actually we're not. Theyre going to pass much stricter gun laws in January and I'll vote against anyone who argues against them.
LOL:
Semi-automatic, functionality meaning that they can eject spent s casings and chamber the next round without additional human action, but (as opposed to automatic firearms) only one round is fired per pull of the trigger.[5]
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...lt_weapon.html
Game. Set. Match.
DMC SUCKS!!
I think you've been so busy with this schtick that you haven't had time to be Avante today.
Another clueless gun advocate who doesnt even know what "semi-automatic" means.
Educate yourself and come back.
Wasn't aware a revolver could eject a spent s .
Ad hominem attacks.
Weapon of choice for gun advocates with no leg to stand on.
LOL. Carry on sir. Consider me trolled.
Is the spent s casing in the chamber when the next round is fired?
Game. Set. Match. !!!
This is like shooting fish in a barrel!
He used the term "assault rifle". I knew what he meant.
Here's what cons utes an "assault weapon"
Assault rifles vs. Assault weapons
In United States politics and law, an assault weapon is a variety of semi-automatic firearms that have certain features generally associated with military firearms, including assault rifles. The 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired on September 13, 2004, codified the definition of an assault weapon. It defined the rifle type of assault weapon as a semiautomatic firearm with the ability to accept a detachable magazine and two or more of the following:
- a folding or telescoping stock
- a pistol grip that protrudes con uously beneath the action of the weapon
- a bayonet mount
- a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor
- a grenade launcher
The assault weapons ban did not restrict weapons capable of fully automatic fire, such as assault rifles and machine guns, which have been continuously and heavily regulated since the National Firearms Act of 1934 was passed. Subsequent laws such as the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 also affected the importation and civilian ownership of fully automatic firearms, the latter fully prohibiting sales of newly manufactured machine guns to non-law enforcement or SOT (special occupational taxpayer) dealers.[8]
Those bayonet lugs and flash hiders are dangerous things, never mind that folding stock. I shiver to even think about it. Grenade launchers? WOW....
Yes. The chamber revolves. Also, the term "ejects" is referring to the weapon ejecting the s , and the s is still in line with the barrel after firing until pulling the trigger again. It does not move away before then.
So you agree then that there are weapons too dangerous for public ownership?
Then its just a question of "whats too dangerous"?
Looks like Assault rifles and larger magazines are going to be added to the list in January (and Im all for it).
Like I said. Assault weapons just look cooler...
No one should be allowed to own a gun with a folding stock,. That's just crazy.
I think everyone knows by now the answer to that question, and it has something to do with you and a buffet line.Then its just a question of "whats too dangerous"?
Me too. I have a load I want to sell when the price goes up.Looks like Assault rifles and larger magazines are going to be added to the list in January (and Im all for it).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions