Reply With Quote
No, I'm saying he didn't declare evolution as dead, because he was clearly against creationism...
Oh so now you have standards on which Scientists I can use?
You said "credible scientists" Your saying he's not?
I ask again: which credible scientists have declared evolution as dead?
No, I'm saying he didn't declare evolution as dead, because he was clearly against creationism...
Scientists Make Fish Grow "Hands" in Experiment That May Reveal How Fins Became Limbs
Read more at http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles...LE7tbouu4dK.99
Read: Evolution
You can hate facts, you can have opinions about facts, you can even choose to deny facts....
But in the end, they are still facts.
For example.... Mouse likes to think he has all the answers but the FACT is that most of the prominent scientists in the world disagree with his conspiracy theories.
Another FACT is that Mouse will try to spin it some way that all of those top scientists are ALL involved in some conspiracy to blind the public to their nefarious deeds!!!
Watch out for that mysterious black (or white) van sitting outside your house if you read this!!! Mouse knows too much and if your connected with him your in trouble!!!
BTW Mouse, I lost the last topic we where discussing... You were supposed to provide me with a link about school books. I went back a few pages but couldn't find the topic. Please private message me your findings on public schools using school books that definitively use the big bang as not just a theory, but as fact.
Again, they must be state sanctioned school material, not something you grab off of the shelf from Barnes and Noble or Amazon.com.
Last edited by phyzik; 12-19-2012 at 03:38 AM.
I'm curious.
What else besides gravity makes something fall? Are you telling me something will "fall" without gravity?
intelligent alien designers
Do you even know who your referring too?
Google the vato and get back to me.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/edwa...d/amicus1.html
Nobel Laureates: Luis W. Alvarez, Carl D. Anderson, Christian B. Anfinsen, Julius Axelrod, David Baltimore, John Bardeen, Paul Berg, Hans A. Bethe, Konrad Bloch, Nicolaas Bloembergen, Michael S. Brown, Herbert C. Brown, Melvin Calvin, S. Chandrasekhar, Leon N. Cooper, Allan Cormack, Andre Cournand, Francis Crick, Renato Dulbecco, Leo Esaki, Val L. Fitch, William A. Fowler, Murray Gell-Mann, Ivar Giaever, Walter Gilbert, Donald A. Glaser, Sheldon Lee Glashow, Joseph L. Goldstein, Roger Guillemin, Roald Hoffmann, Robert Hofstadter, Robert W. Holley, David H. Hubel, Charles B. Huggins, H. Gobind Khorana, Arthur Kornberg, Polykarp Kusch, Willis E. Lamb, Jr., William Lipscomb, Salvador E. Luria, Barbara McClintock, Bruce Merrifield, Robert S. Mulliken, Daniel Nathans, Marshall Nirenberg, John H. Northrop, Severo Ochoa, George E. Palade, Linus Pauling, Arno A. Penzias, Edward M. Purcell, Isidor I. Rabi, Burton Richter, Frederick Robbins, J. Robert Schrieffer, Glenn T. Seaborg, Emilio Segre, Hamilton O. Smith, George D. Snell, Roger Sperry, Henry Taube, Howard M. Temin, Samuel C. C. Ting, Charles H. Townes, James D. Watson, Steven Weinberg, Thomas H. Weller, Eugene P. Wigner, Kenneth G. Wilson, Robert W. Wilson, Rosalyn Yalow, Chen Ning Yang.
Teaching religious ideas mislabeled as science is detrimental to scientific education: It sets up a false conflict between science and religion, misleads our youth about the nature of scientific inquiry, and thereby compromises our ability to respond to the problems of an increasingly technological world. Our capacity to cope with problems of food production, health care, and even national defense will be jeopardized if we deliberately strip our citizens of the power to distinguish between the phenomena of nature and supernatural articles of faith. "Creation-science" simply has no place in the public-school science classroom.
Psssssssst! Do more research.
He later admitted to a designer
Crick simply thought that design was more probable than spontaneous generation — so much so that he was willing to entertain the idea of space aliens popping on over to the Third Rock from the Sun long enough to seed it with bacterial DNA and then disappear for several million years.Intelligent Design without a Divine designer created life structures able to develop the space-travelling aliens.
Why does evolution scare mouse so much
I have videos of other scientist jumping off the Darwin wagon when I am back in San Antonio I will post them.
Please read the disclaimer thank you.
U scared
Crick was also a known LSD user, and that alien sounds like the ramblings of someone who's high...
Yea you better keep your fingers crossed those limbs start sprouting soon or your in deep .
Poor phyzik your whole misguided world is collapsing and your to stubborn to admit it.
Seriously dude did you not watch the videos they found a code in the DNA that shows a "designer"
What part of scoreboard do you not get?
It's over your team lost show some class.
And Darwin smoked weed and masturbated what does that have to do with our discussion?
Why don't you watch my videos and try and debunk them instead of allowing Google to make you look foolish?
On a side note the next "Scien s" I post that confirms Intelligen design was at one time seen having a beer let me know if I should not quote him.
Why does science frighten you?
Did some science jocks bully you in high school?
Science...hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right after Jesse Owens beat the world at the 1936 Olympics scientists were asked just how fast is possible for human beings to run a 100m, the world record was 10.2. After doing all their study and research they got together figured it all out and came back with...9.9. Anything faster would be sci fi, the human body simply couldn't deal with the velocity of something faster.
9.9 was first ran back in the late 60's, since then we have seen tons of guys run sub 9.9. Then there's Usain Bolt at 9.58. So much for science. , the HS record...10.01.
NEWSFLASH
Science isn't always right and doesn't know everything. Take science from 1760 compared to 1860, then 1960 to 2060, obviously science will look a of a lot different after a 100 years, why is that if science knows everything? Scientists in 2060 will be laughing at science of 1760.
Last edited by Avante; 12-20-2012 at 02:29 AM.
I read some stupid from you in the past, but this takes the cake.
But yet the old evolution charts from the 1800s are still in the text books of students today.
I don't hate science I hate the lies they print in the textbooks.
All anyone has to do is look at how science has evolved over the years, how many times have old beliefs been proven wrong? A 100 years from not the science of today will look silly.
When I played HS football we were given these salt tablets that were suppose to....now they are outlawed yep, wrong. Look at what athletes are doing today compared to just 50 years ago, no way science would have predicted a woman running like they do today. There is soooooooo much we don't know, for anyone to say....well science....hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
I hear ya.
[QUOTE=phyzik;6254303]Scientists Make Fish Grow "Hands" in Experiment That May Reveal How Fins Became Limbs
And how did the fish get here, does it have DNA?
What part of the video I posted did you not watch? DNA is a factYou can hate facts, you can have opinions about facts, you can even choose to deny facts....
There is a code in the DNA that is a fact
Without DNA you don't have your hairy apes to "Evolve" from fact
Scientist have discovered the code in the smallest living cell and in the molecules that make up the cells to have a code. fact
The code shows a "design" fact
Many Scientist are bailing from the false Darwin Evolution theory. fact
You, Darwin, and all your misguided redneck friends standing around the bed of your pickup truck can't help you this time. fact
Intelligent Design won the debate it's over fact
Your to hard headed to realize it and if you did, your to proud to admit it. fact
This time next week you will still be posting old outdated Fish with limbs drivel asking for proof Evolution is a lie. fact
And I will feel sorry for you and post again and again the proof your going to ignore. fact
And one day your going to ..
A: Come clean and admit you was mislead. fact
B: Change your screen name and start fresh as a new poster. fact
or
C: off yourself with the words "I hate you mouse" written in lipstick on the mirror. fact?
But Science is "never" wrong they are just always "revising"
At one time Asbestos was good for you so was Tobacco.
every 5 years coffee is bad , now its good its helps the brain, then 5 years later its bad again.
If Science was so great we wouldn't have Bald people and kids with Autism.
Science can't tell you how the Pyramids were built but they can tell you with pictures and in great detail what took place in our solar system 12 Billion years ago?
If they know so much about how the solar system was formed, when it was formed, and what it was formed with, why go to Mars?
Just look at your notes.
It's 1965, you tell a college football coach.... Tex in another 40 years or so everyone of those boys on the offensive line will weigh over 300 pounds....you'd be laughed at. I 've seen a HS line average over 300 pounds.
The things we are seeing today should never be happening according to the science of yesteryear. Look at women and swimming, they would have won the mens Olympic compe ion not soooo many years ago. No way science would have seen that coming.
Don't expect anyone to actually read this, it's something that proves how wrong science can be.
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-most-f...o-be-wrong.php
Last edited by Avante; 12-20-2012 at 04:26 AM.
Leave it to Avante to make this thread about Avante.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
