Reply With Quote
No I haven't. I'm not sure what your point is.
have you ever been in a movie where people yelling made it better?
No I haven't. I'm not sure what your point is.
Well in my experience, there have been chatty asshole moviegoers of all races (usually youth is the common denominator), but it's usually a black guy that tells them to STFU.
I saw Anaconda with people yelling "YOU GONNA DIE" at the screen and it was awesome.
LMAO. I guess the movies where people yelling make it better are the kind of movies that I wait for DVD.
I don't really go to the theater any more anyways, but in the right environment it is fine. I got shushed for laughing hysterically during Hannibal's envelope sniffing scene.
same here. now about 90% of the movies I see at the theater are cartoons.
just saw the movie and fortunately it was just me and this old in the theater. even though he kept coughing throughout...
in any event i loved it, not quite sure why a black supremacist like you wouldn't see it trill...the brotha is actually the protagonist in this one....
Last edited by chunticakes; 12-28-2012 at 03:56 PM.
All races up a movie.........I saw Django christmas night. The black dude next to me laughed at everything. that wasnt close to funny. The hispanic guy and white girl in front of me, stayed on their phone texting and FBing the whole movie. The black couple next to them watched the movie like normal mu as. The white dude on the other side did the same. So stop the bull . All races are fugged up.
i will watch the film, online.
i will NOT put money in QT's racist pockets while he makes a mockery about a very sensitive time in african american history.
plus i heard that jaime just a sidekick to his "white savior" doctor what's his name.
Remember your posting style of the past few days? Go back to that.
Agreed I wish he was president today
Abraham Lincoln Quote“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.”
by:
Abraham Lincoln
(1809-1865) 16th US President
Source:
Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858
(The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, pp. 145-146.)
^Daaaamn! Never read that before. Did they show that in the movie?
if he really was racist he wouldn't have allowed himself to be killed by a black guy in his own movie.
Was that Tarantino paying homage with his KKK bumbling scene to Mel Brooks bumbling Cowboy bad guys in the desert at the toll booth in Blazing Saddles?
Or Tarantino paying homage to himself with that scene at the end where the plantation residents walking side by side up the road toward the mansion to the scene in Resovoir Dogs where the men are walking side by side?
sure he would.
why does he always have to throw n!gger around in EVERY movie?
he finds some ways to sneak that in in every movie, doggie.
he even had a brotha get raped by gay cac in pulp fiction.
i peeped QT's racist ways a long time ago.
Lo
that's not relevant to this movie. do you think the word nigger was an often used word in the south in 1858? Looks to me like Tarantino was just going for historical accuracy.
@the bold-i'm not saying it is.
i didn't support his racist movies then and i'm not support a spaghetti western slave movie either.
that cracka and the coons who acted in it.
Your understanding of the film is exactly what I would expect from someone who hasn't watched it.
and i expected white folk to come out in droves to support a spaghetti western slavery movie.
there are critics who have seen the film who share the same sentiments as i do.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment...,1771716.story
Hilarious that the writer thinks Basterds is ok dealing with Jews plight as the theme (some 70 or so years ago) while Django is "disrespectful" in dealing with an issue abolished more than twice as long ago.
the writer never mentioned anything about basters being okay.Hilarious that the writer thinks Basterds is ok dealing with Jews plight as the theme (some 70 or so years ago) while Django is "disrespectful" in dealing with an issue abolished more than twice as long ago.
the writer did quote a black film critic who said the following:
Where "Basterds" arguably works as both social commentary and entertainment, he said, "Django" doesn't because blacks as a group are still so compromised by racism. "The surreal liftoff that happens at some point in 'Basterds' doesn't happen here, because of the weight of what's still real," he said. "For example, there's a certain racial backlash to Obama that's still going on. Quentin wants this to be a dark comedy, but with [black] history the way it is, you can't get from here to there in a movie. There's no ill intention on his part, but it doesn't work. The movie can't rest."
there were no scenes of concentration camps or jews being killed and punished in basterds.
meanhile in bojangles unchained, we see slaves being beat, killed and tortured.
i wouldn't expect non blacks to understand why some blacks find this film disrespectful to our history.
bojangles unchained
oh look the race card is being played
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions