Reply With Quote
Wow...
If that information is correct, Obama is a psychopathic killer. Who targets a home as a military target? one of the attacks hit a school.
Wow...
If that information is correct, Obama is a psychopathic killer. Who targets a home as a military target? one of the attacks hit a school.
You'd be doing backflips and waving pompoms, or very least shrugging, if the MIC did this under a Repug admin.
During dubya's Reign of Error, no civilians were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by US arms, and esp not wedding parties of dozens of people.
Um yea, you still think I'm blowing out of proportion now? He's a ing psychopath. Child murderer and war criminal.
I see one drone attack during the Bush years in that spread, a vehicle or convoy of only militants. Several of the attacks Obama authorized were residences, and even at least one elementary school was hit.
Is this where the series theme "Homeland" comes from I wonder...
what you can find fits in a thimble. according to various easily findable sources, the number of drone strikes under Bush is 52. Obama's number is bigger by a factor of at least five, but 52 is vastly bigger than one.
what's your source on that, btw?
(for mine, check New America foundation and wikipedia)
This was just Yemen. I didn't say he only did one attack.
fair enough
Funny how the writers of Wikipedia give Bush credit for a drone attack that the Pakistani's say they did. The one killing more than 70 in Chenagai. The link tied to it that the wiki writer uses even says the US denied that attack and the Pakistani's took credit for it.
Can't trust wiki without verifying.
Alcoholic...
Do you ever follow the source links when you use wiki?
hey clowns
u know with collateral, do u pay compensation or anything goes?
cause the british are paying up for collateral compensation or some ....
You can see where Obama went trigger happy starting in 2011. I'd like to see a Pakistan map....
Personally I would have to be shown malicious intent to give a about bombing Yemen. If you are a SA210 that believes that the feds are lying to us about 9/11 and what not then I get this approach of AQ as boogeyman but if
1) you believe that AQ is real and actually did attack the US in '01
2) they are still actively planning attacks on US soil
then I see this as guerrilla warfare. It's almost as if you guys would feel better if it was an army battallion or F-16's that were doing it with the fixation on drones as the delivery system. You guys sound like the same complaints that were given with bombing in Vietnam in terms of tactics. THEY BOMBED A VILLAGE!
I agree with the need for military operation against AQ and their bases especially their training facilities. 250 drone strikes over 4 years hardly seems like too much.
I would go for incompetence. Obama is simply incompetent as CiC.
I guess you don't know what a surgical strike is. Under the current administration, there is way too much collateral damage. It's as if these people are inmhuman to him.
As if you could sniff a good take on competent military tactics. You even make E4?
All collateral damage is 'too much.' This GOP minion gone dove bull is hilarious though.
Fuzzy...
Why are you stalking me and finding fault in everything I say?
Why are you being like a first grade bully?
Quit being stupid and I will quit pointing it out. Calling me a bully does not deter me and does not gain you any sympathy around here. I don't like stupidity and I will always speak out against it. If you don't like it go away or put me on ignore.
In this case, my post that you responded to in no way addressed you. You were arguing with WH about the credibility of wikipedia which my post had nothing to do with. You brought my response on yourself. Quit crying.
Liar.
You are constantly starting with me and others for no good reason.
You are ing pathetic.
Rage, Rage against the.....
I did not address you in this thread until you addressed me. I would say that I am sorry that I hurt your feelings but I am not but I didn't start this one. And I told you before, quit saying stupid and I will quit being mean to you. Until then you might as well deal with it because crying like this isn't exactly getting work done.
Wow...
The truth for once.
The difference is I didn't respond with anything offensive. You are always starting offensive bull .
So you never made E4?
I think your tactical a en is very much on point in regards to you making statements about competency. You don't like it then don't say stupid . Sorry if that means that you cannot speak at all but I cannot help your inclinations it seems.
The 'war on terror' - by design - can never end
As the Pentagon's former top lawyer urges that the war be viewed as finite, the US moves in the opposite direction"Now that efforts by the US military against al-Qaida are in their 12th year, we must also ask ourselves: How will this conflict end? . . . . 'War' must be regarded as a finite, extraordinary and unnatural state of affairs. We must not accept the current conflict, and all that it entails, as the 'new normal.' Peace must be regarded as the norm toward which the human race continually strives. . . .
"There will come a tipping point at which so many of the leaders and operatives of al-Qaida and its affiliates have been killed or captured, and the group is no longer able to attempt or launch a strategic attack against the United States, that al-Qaida will be effectively destroyed."
Rachel Maddow interviewed Johnson, and before doing so, she opined as follows:
"When does this thing we are in now end? And if it does not have an end — and I'm not speaking as a lawyer here, I am just speaking as a citizen who feels morally accountable for my country's actions — if it does not have an end, then morally speaking it does not seem like it is a war. And then, our country is killing people and locking them up outside the traditional judicial system in a way I think we maybe cannot be forgiven for."
a "disposition matrix" to determine how terrorism suspects will be disposed of, all based on this fact: "among senior Obama administration officials, there is broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade." As Miller puts it: "That timeline suggests that the United States has reached only the midpoint of what was once known as the global war on terrorism."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ndless-johnson
^great article
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
