Reply With Quote
slaves were better off with their benevolent owners anyways
what exactly do you think the phrase ”all other persons” is referring to?
slaves were better off with their benevolent owners anyways
The WC Compromise
Cherry picking my ideas and paraphrasing them for out of context I see. How about considering how much better off the slaves of benevolent owners were than those of evil owners. Even if not liking the idea, these people could feel good for treating their slaves with dignity.
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 01-06-2013 at 03:30 PM.
The blacks started slavery, they sold their own out of Africa. The whites never sold their own to Africa.
You have the burden of proof. The evidence shows that the blacks were named after the Founding Fathers.
The liberals should also be happy that the slaves got free health care.
There are just too many different ways to go here.
I'll just go with lol per the usual
no , goalpostileo
Evidence shows you are re ed.
The evidence shows that pretty much all the founding fathers you listed owned slaves.
slavery was legal back then.
And the cons ution did absolutely nothing to change that, so it had to be amended.
Unsurprisingly, the slave owning founding fathers made sure of that.
No, the British Empire made slavery legal. It was the Founding Fathers who started getting rid of slavery.
The Cons ution had incentives built into it to end slavery. It also had a provision to end the slave trade.
They did all about ending it. They kept their slaves.
not true. 2/3 of the nation had freed their slaves by 1860. Most had freed them long prior to that.
they could have started the nation out slave free.
They just liked owning slaves too much.
You are a liberal who hates America.
You are a nutbag who loves slavery.
You don't even deny that you hate America.
You don't even deny you love slavery.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions