No - because it was not sh*tty. It was a solid movie unless you have the brain of an ant minus all the strength too.
Can we discuss how ty the hobbit was in here?
No - because it was not sh*tty. It was a solid movie unless you have the brain of an ant minus all the strength too.
It's funny how both Black people and White people are calling this movie racist against their people.
if thats all you took out of this movie, I feel sorry for you
Those people need to sit back, smoke a bong and just chill out, its only a movie.
The hobbit was more walking.
It sets up for part 2 to be an awesome movie though.
It's like for Germans to about how the Nazi party leaders and friends/family got shot, burnt, and blown to ashes by the Bear Jew and his comrade in Inglourious Basterds. People are so brainless that they forget Django Unchained is a Tarantino movie, not a National Geographic do entary on slavery in the US.
Yeah if I remember rightly Inglourious claimed no historical accuracy and same with Django. Just lighten up for christ sake, movies don't always have to be read into so much. It was a very enjoyable film but also a good one, obviously not everyone will think so but if you disagree about that purely because you think its racist, just lighten up. Almost just looking for reasons to complain
Wait hitler was not killed in a theater?
I burned it last night, great movie, that KKK scene had me lmao.
yeah that hooded scene and that scene where don johnson has to explain to the slave girl not to treat django like an ordinary black folk
Samuel L. Jackson had a much bigger role than one would think based off the advertisements.
Overall, I'd put this third behind Pulp Fiction and Inglorious Basterds.
I didn't even know Samuel was in the movie until I saw it
I've read that DiCaprio rubbing his bloody hand on Kerri Washington's face was completely unscripted. What the ?
yeah apparently he cut it on the glass then just went with it.... lucky kerri
There's no way anybody would stay in character with real blood getting rubbed on their face. i heard the blood was real but after a take they s ched him up and used fake blood on her face.
If it was true, he'd be crossing a line by doing that. On one hand, I admire the improvisation. On the other hand, smearing blood on somebody's face unbeknownst to them, is disgusting.
I have to believe it's fake blood because of just how disgusting and offensive it is. I doubt DDL could stay in character if he was getting real blood smeared all over his face.
apparently on the set of Lincoln he would only speak if you wanted to talk about current events... of 1865.
Leo got robbed, man.
Interesting...the primary age group interested in action figures should definitely NOT watch this movie.
Saw it recently. Fantastic movie. Tarantino is very hit or miss with me. I think his long scenes of dialogue can bore me, but sometimes they are interesting. I think Kill Bill was his most bloated, disjointed film. Death Proof is technically his worse, but I prefer it over Kill Bill. People always talk about his writing, but I think Tarantino has turned into a very good visual director, in some ways I think he's a better director than writer.
Django was great though. The movie was brisk, the dialogue was rarely boring, and I enjoyed the linear structure for once. The shootouts were amazing.
My favorite of Tarantino is
1)Resevoir Dogs
2)Django Unchained
3)Inglourious basterds.
son he always gets robbed of nominations by them. in 2006 they nominated him for Blood Diamond when his best performance that year was in The Departed (both Golden Globes and British awards agreed as he was nominated for The Departed by each). he was snubbed big time for Revolutionary Road and honestly should have won in 2004 with The Aviator.
I think Leo's biggest problem is that he is too famous for the Oscars. they usually frown upon big name stars, but he has been solid in pretty much every role he has ever been in. its a shame that he wasn't nominated for Django because he was the best performance in the movie. also what makes it even more ridiculous is that he would have been up for Best SUPPORTING Actor in this role which is a pretty weak category this year compared to the lead actor category. The Academy must really hate him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)