Once again, you destroy your own case. The Lakers have the greater chance for future success because of their market and their money, not because of the proficiency of their front office.
Look at where the Lakers were after the 2002 season. Three straight les, Kobe and Shaq in their primes, and Phil Jackson on the bench. Add the advantages of their market and their money.
What have they accomplished from that position of strength?
2 les in 10 years. Looking at 2 les in 11 years and a second trip to the lottery in that time frame. A great front office would have done so much more with such an embarrassment of riches.
One last point. Maybe this one will penetrate.
If the Laker front office is so much better than the Spur front office, why do so many franchises around the NBA choose to hire disciples of Popovich and Buford? Why don't they hire former Laker assistants to run their franchises? Think about it. The answer is obvious.

Reply With Quote


