Hypocricy of Democrats: "Obama's CIA Nominee- Bush-Era Torturer?"

[ChumpDumper]

Still haven't watched the video.

Your description of it reinforces my initial decision.

[LnGrrrR]

Well I think that just speaks more to me having a life outside this forum, but as far as actual viewpoints and sticking my neck out there, I am definitely one of the few to go against the grain in here, no doubt.

I don't think you're really as unique as you think you are. There's a few hundred of you at most Ron Paul rallies.

Anyhow, I posted the story in the format of a video. If simple minded trolls can't process video information, even though it contains the same as written information then I think that says more about you than me, tbh.

Yes, video information is much harder to process than written information. That stupid logical formulation says a lot about you. That and you being a prick and all.

Either way you know the purpose of the thread, it's in the le, it's about the hypocrisy of the left.

Actually, it's about how Brennan should be unacceptable to Democrats who complained about certain things under the Bush regime and not under the Obama regime. That said, it implies there is an acceptable candidate for these people. You've refused to name one, even though it would've taken all of two seconds. Funny that.

To add to that, since facts thru a video format scare you, Cenk goes on in his reporting to give examples of how Democrats make excuses for Obama, policy after policy throughout the years and how Obama continues to back-stab his cons uency and when he does it the left drinks it down, when they were angry and outspoken about Bush when Bush passed the same policies and said the same kinds of lies.

It's basically a news story that the left would love to ignore as they clearly are lol. That's sad, since I'm very left leaning, but I refuse to stay silent when the left does these things, same as I wasn't silent when Bush did them. Only difference is Obama is President now.

And if you paid even the slightest bit of attention, you'd have noticed that most of the left-leaning posters on here, including DoK, ElNono, Winehole and others, usually decry these sorts of things, and realize that most Dems are partisans. Why should I defend Democrats that I think are spineless morons?

Trolls like Dok can pretend like Dems don't approve of what Obama has done, but it's all bull when morons like him say those things, because they aren't calling for impeachment, holding him accountable for the very same things they did with Bush. Perfect example is given in the news story I posted.

Except DoK has never pretended that Dems don't approve of what Obama has done. Of course, there are some notable pundits who grill Obama as much as they did Bush. Glenn Greenwald comes to mind.

This isn't rocket science, yall already know this. Ya'll just try to troll and change the subject so that yall don't have to look at yourselves and realize you are living a lie, simply out of ignorance and convenience and party loyalty.

To this moment yall hate on a 7 minute news story you "claim" to ignore because you don't want to watch it, but yet have spent even more time than that to change the subject, ignore the topic and to try to tear down the poster Ignorance

Who's living a lie? Which one of us on the forums decried torture under Bush, but support it under Obama? Anyone? We tear down you as a poster because you're a ty poster. You don't actually listen to people, you just spout pla udes and post youtubes instead of having a dialogue. That makes you ty.

Still haven't seen anyone refute Cenks news content.

If he posted a video saying the sky was blue, I wouldn't bother to refute that either. BREAKING NEWS! SOME POLITICIANS ARE PARTISAN! HOLY !

[SA210]

I don't think you're really as unique as you think you are. There's a few hundred of you at most Ron Paul rallies.



Yes, video information is much harder to process than written information. That stupid logical formulation says a lot about you. That and you being a prick and all.



Actually, it's about how Brennan should be unacceptable to Democrats who complained about certain things under the Bush regime and not under the Obama regime. That said, it implies there is an acceptable candidate for these people. You've refused to name one, even though it would've taken all of two seconds. Funny that.



And if you paid even the slightest bit of attention, you'd have noticed that most of the left-leaning posters on here, including DoK, ElNono, Winehole and others, usually decry these sorts of things, and realize that most Dems are partisans. Why should I defend Democrats that I think are spineless morons?



Except DoK has never pretended that Dems don't approve of what Obama has done. Of course, there are some notable pundits who grill Obama as much as they did Bush. Glenn Greenwald comes to mind.



Who's living a lie? Which one of us on the forums decried torture under Bush, but support it under Obama? Anyone? We tear down you as a poster because you're a ty poster. You don't actually listen to people, you just spout pla udes and post youtubes instead of having a dialogue. That makes you ty.



If he posted a video saying the sky was blue, I wouldn't bother to refute that either. BREAKING NEWS! SOME POLITICIANS ARE PARTISAN! HOLY !

Yea well that was all bs, still waiting for you to refute the content of the news story itself though

[LnGrrrR]

Yea well that was all bs, still waiting for you to refute the content of the news story itself though

Hey, moron, pay attention. I'm not refuting the video because I agree, some Democrats are hypocrites. Now, who SHOULD Democrats want for CIA Chief if Brennan is unacceptable?

[Clipper Nation]

I'm still waiting to see all the Democrats on this site who approve of/agree with how Obama has handled the middle east/foreign policy.

Tbh, it's the Obama-bashing neocon crowd who seem to love his foreign policy more than the Democrats

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Tbh, it's the Obama-bashing neocon crowd who seem to love his foreign policy more than the Democrats

the neocons criticize this pro-Islam anti-Israel Obama foreign policy that doesn't exist. A lot of the criticisms I hear about Obama are things I wish were actually true (doesn't do enough on the middle east, hates Israel, hates corporations and business, etc.).

[Jacob1983]

Obama doesn't hate Israel. America has still given Israel money to buy their loyalty and friendship during his presidency.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Obama doesn't hate Israel. America has still given Israel money to buy their loyalty and friendship during his presidency.

Thanks for repeating the obvious implication of my post when I said I wish it was true that Obama hates Israel.

[LnGrrrR]

Hey, moron, pay attention. I'm not refuting the video because I agree, some Democrats are hypocrites. Now, who SHOULD Democrats want for CIA Chief if Brennan is unacceptable?

Bumped for SA, even though he's too pussy to answer anything but, "No one! They should stop having the CIA! And we should disarm all our nukes! Love is the way!"

[SA210]

Bumped for SA, even though he's too pussy to answer anything but, "No one! They should stop having the CIA! And we should disarm all our nukes! Love is the way!"

Thanks for bumping my thread and the facts in the youtube. Many lurkers have watched it.

[LnGrrrR]

Thanks for bumping my thread and the facts in the youtube. Many lurkers have watched it.

Too pussy to even give a name! *smh*

[Blake]

Thanks for bumping my thread and the facts in the youtube. Many lurkers have watched it.

Thanks for fighting the good fight by posting a youtube.

[SA210]

Where was Ed on this issue during Election theater 2012?

[johnsmith]

Everytime 210 posts I think about Mrs. Lovejoy saying, "won't someone think of the children"


I also feel sorry for anyone associated withe the 210 area code. He's giving you a bad name.

[LnGrrrR]

Where was Ed on this issue during Election theater 2012?

Hey, whiner, where were YOU when I asked you who you think should be CIA Chief? It's amazing that you're too spineless to even give a name.

[SA210]

Hey, whiner, where were YOU when I asked you who you think should be CIA Chief? It's amazing that you're too spineless to even give a name.

What's funny is that you think you made a point and you never did. You got my answer and that's the way it is, I'm not gonna change it for a pussy like you just because you need to feel some kind of fake victory. You can't get an answer then not like that answer and demand a new one, dumbass. We have different ideas, mine is better than yours, sheep. You are a troll to anything I write, so you are now blocked.

And thanks again for bumping my thread and the FACTS in my OP. lol

[SA210]

Everytime 210 posts I think about Mrs. Lovejoy saying, "won't someone think of the children"


I also feel sorry for anyone associated withe the 210 area code. He's giving you a bad name.

Nah, sheep already have a bad name and they aren't exclusive to the 210. Glad I'm not in that particular company.

[TeyshaBlue]

What's funny is that you think you made a point and you never did. You got my answer and that's the way it is, I'm not gonna change it for a pussy like you just because you need to feel some kind of fake victory. You can't get an answer then not like that answer and demand a new one, dumbass. We have different ideas, mine is better than yours, sheep. You are a troll to anything I write, so you are now blocked.

And thanks again for bumping my thread and the FACTS in my OP. lol

What's funny (sad smile) is you could actually construct a point in this thread if you weren't intent on the transmorgrification of baggery from an adjective to a verb.

[Blake]

Nah, sheep already have a bad name and they aren't exclusive to the 210. Glad I'm not in that particular company.

When Ron Paul raises his shepherd pole, you bah with the best of them

[Blake]

Nah, sheep already have a bad name and they aren't exclusive to the 210. Glad I'm not in that particular company.

When Ron Paul raises his shepherd pole, you bah with the best of them

[LnGrrrR]

What's funny is that you think you made a point and you never did. You got my answer and that's the way it is, I'm not gonna change it for a pussy like you just because you need to feel some kind of fake victory. You can't get an answer then not like that answer and demand a new one, dumbass. We have different ideas, mine is better than yours, sheep. You are a troll to anything I write, so you are now blocked.

And thanks again for bumping my thread and the FACTS in my OP. lol

Your answer of "We shouldn't have a CIA! WAAHH!!!" is more pussy than anything in this thread, tbh. It's not an answer at all, like saying, "I think that if America gets attacked, we should hand flowers over to the enemy! Love and peace!"

Your idea sucks because it's completely unrealistic and not going to happen. You suck because you're an idiot, you can't think for yourself, and you can't even elucidate on the youtubes that tell you what to think.

Oh, and good job with the "You're blocked!" That certainly shows how much of a non-pussy you are.

[LnGrrrR]

What's funny (sad smile) is you could actually construct a point in this thread if you weren't intent on the transmorgrification of baggery from an adjective to a verb.

He can't make that point because there's not a Youtube out there to make it for him. He's a ing idiot.