Legit question. People be dodging in here
Every time there's a scuffle on the field between two or more players guess what race is always responsible for the brouhaha?
tbh you can't have a play where one black guy tackles another where they don't have to be separated by the refs. Is it tribal instincts or something else? Something tells me if John Lynch were to ever tackle Jason Witten they wouldn't have to be separated like wild monkeys, Lynch would just simply help him up and give him a pat on the helmet.
or when there's a fumble and, though the refs have already called it, they're grabbing at the football as if it's an EBT card
Vick tbh
ha ha!
Certain posters are avoiding this thread like phyzik at an AA meeting i saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Now think of how boring the game would be if only white players were allowed to play it. A league with Danny Woodhead as your leading rusher...hahahaha!!!!!!!
A league with nothing but black players (which we have with the SWAC/MEAC in college) would be far more exciting.
So we have to put up with some over aggresiveness to get that speed, agility and quickness, cool with me. Sure beats the out of watching a bunch of slow white dudes out there.
ground breaking insight.
the SWAC and the MEAC are the two worst conferences in Division I college football. Complete garbage.
^truth bombs.
Not even just football, schools like Grambling St., Southern, Howard U., Jackson St., etc. all have basketball teams just as awful as their football teams. When two of those schools are on TV, the only good part is the unintentional comedy that occurs during timeouts when the people in the stands get up and dance as if they were auditing for roles in the movie Stomp the Yard (and yes, this really does happen).
I think I used the word....exciting.
So tell me if we had an all white foootball league and an all black league which league sells more tickets?
You do know the NFL has had a ton of great players from the SWAC....right?
It must be since so many here run down black players.
What the is wrong with this forum? It seems so much better during game days.
A league without Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees would suck.
Your insight is , per the usual.
1.) Bad football is not exciting football.
2.) I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the league that appeals to the demographic with more disposal income would sell more tickets.
3.) You realize there hasn't been an influx of great NFL players from the HBU schools since the mid-70s, right?
As usual...wrong! Tell us all again about Wes Welker, ya moron.
Look at the top 50 rushers of all time in the NFL, there are three white guyts listed...John Riggins, Larry Czonka, Jim Taylor...all power backs. Look at the top 50 wibe receivers of all time in the NFL, We see Steve Largent, Fred Biletnifoff, Don Maynard, Ray Berry and Lance Alworth (this guy was amazing)as far as white power goes.
Who is the greatest middle backer....Ray Lewis, then there's Lawrence Taylor, Derrick Thomas. Look at that D line...
"Mean" Joe Greene
Bruce Smith
Reggie White
Deacon Jones
Defensive backs is a joke, go ahead give me the name of a great white cornerback?
Without the black athlete football at all levels would be farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr less exciting. What white player can do a Trindon Holliday, Devin Hester impersonation? Well?
White players simply don't have those quicks, speed, elusiveness. There are far more black QB's who can play QB than white players who can really run. They don't have that size/tall with speed like a Michael Turner/Calvin Johnson.
Last edited by Avante; 01-14-2013 at 12:47 PM.
What was the last HBCU game you watched...well?
Wrong about the 70;s and those HBCU schools.
Steve McNair...Alcorn
Jerry Rice...MVS
Jimmy Smith...Jackson State
Donald Driver...Alcorn
and I could go on.
I'd rather tell you about Manning, Brees, Rodgers and Brady because they are white.
Why are you stupid?
I noticed you totally ignored you stupid statements about Welker, why?
I noticed you also ignored everything else I said, why?
So I'll ask you this, which would be more successful and all black NFL or an all white one?
Because even though he puts up big time numbers, not everyone agrees he's exciting.
Why should I answer a stupid question that only deals in personal taste?I noticed you also ignored everything else I said, why?
So I'll ask you this, which would be more successful and all black NFL or an all white one?
I could see them being equally successful, but it doesn't matter what I think about something that would never happen
To sum up this thread, Avante really wants the black male athlete D, tbh...
You really are an idiot.
Do you really believe the public is going to watch tye slower/less quick/less exciting league?
How about I see (like we all do) who makes the game exciting? And it's not the slow white athlete.
Yes, I believe a league filled with Peyton Mannings would draw a huge audience.
it's a quarterbacks league. 7 of the top 10 jersey sales are QB jerseys.
6 of those 7 are white.
You're stupid.
Stupid is thinking those QB's are successful with the black receivers and black backs putting them in third and short.
Do you work at...duh!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guarantee if we had two leagues the black league would dominate.
I guarantee if you weren't less, you'd be a man.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)