Suck it, libs

[Trill Clinton]

hey...just for s and giggles I opened an online account through a sex pop up ad that came through to my yahoo account...I only had to pay a one time fee of 49.95 now I have all kinds of women sending me emails and they're all over my ...I met this one white chic and she only requires that I pay an additional 24.95 to get access to her profile...I'm feeling pretty good about my manhood because of this..things are looking up for me Trill...you Negro's are jealous of Kool...I now consider myself a certified mack and a Ho pimp..I'm da man

daaamn you getting es like that?!!

i thought cody was bull ting when he told us about that site but lo and behold he was right.

shoot me that lank pleighboi so i can check it out.

i am intrigued. at first i was like



now i'm like

[DMX7]

lol King Obama. They used to just call him a nig. Now they call him a king.

[Wild Cobra]

Where did you get that?

http://cons ution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

My understanding is at the time, "well regulated" was meant to achieve "accurate and proper functioning." after all, you cannot have a militia without weapons. Doesn't it make sense to promote the idea that citizens buy their own militia weapons?

[Wild Cobra]

Where did you get that?

I'd like a repub gun advocate to explain this to me: If the government can regulate nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, without violating the 2nd amendment, then why can't they also regulate guns? Aren't all of those examples of "arms"? Or, does the cons ution only refer to the flintlock rifles used in the 1700's?

I'm not a "repub" so I don't think you will accept my answer. I see it simply that the likes of such weapons are not employed, even today, buy our modernized militia. The National Guard.

The militia was meant as a ground force.

Now I will accept that since the government has taken on the role of have a 24/7 military, that restrictions can be made on the degree of weapons available to the public. I think any ban of semiautomatic rifles or lesser weapons would be wrong, as for people could possible be in an "urban warfare" environment should we be invaded.

[The Reckoning]

im all for a handgun ban in dc.

just to watch violent crimerate go up

[George Gervin's Afro]

Oregon sheriff tells Biden he won't enforce new gun regulations
Published January 15, 2013
Associated Press

Jan. 15, 2013: Linn County, Sheriff Tim Mueller displays a copy of the letter he sent to Vice President Joe Biden, at his office in Albany, Ore. (AP)

PORTLAND, Ore. – An Oregon sheriff has sent a letter to Vice President Joe Biden saying his department will not enforce any new gun laws it considers uncons utional.

Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller, in his letter dated Monday, said politicians are "attempting to exploit the deaths of innocent victims" by supporting laws that would harm law-abiding Americans. The sheriff said he took an oath to support the Cons ution, and laws preventing citizens from owning certain semi-automatic firearms and ammunition magazines would violate their rights.

"We are Americans," Mueller wrote. "We must not allow, nor shall we tolerate, the actions of criminals, no matter how heinous the crimes, to prompt politicians to enact laws that will infringe upon the liberties of responsible citizens who have broken no laws."

Mueller told The Associated Press in a phone interview from Albany, Ore., that he felt compelled to make his views known because sheriffs have not had much of a say on the vice president's anti-gun violence task force. Mueller said his cons uents have been repeatedly asking his deputies about what will happen if new gun restrictions are adopted.

"We're restricted and prohibited from enforcing all types of federal laws, including immigration laws," he said Tuesday. "It would be unreasonable for anyone to think that I would enforce a federal firearms law."

The sheriff figures Biden probably won't even receive his letter, but "it needed to be said, so I said it."

"I tried to be as respectful as possible, but I also needed to get my point across," Mueller said.

Mueller said some other sheriffs expressed support for his stance, but he does not know of any who have pledged to take similar action in regard to potential gun laws. Holly Russell, executive director of the Oregon State Sheriff's Association, did not respond to phone and email messages left late Tuesday afternoon.

Linn County is largely rural and politically conservative. Fewer than 40 percent of its registered voters supported President Barack Obama in November. Mueller said most households in the county have guns.

Though the letter might add fuel to an already hot topic, Mueller said he wishes people could have a civilized discussion about the issue, rather than resort to threats and name-calling. He said he doesn't think the vice president is a bad person; he just doesn't like the path he appears to be on regarding gun laws.

"We don't have to be jerks to each other over it," he said. "If old Joe wants to come out here to Linn County, we'd have a good conversation."



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...#ixzz2I9BXCMMR

I guess when you lose at the ballot box and get laws you don't like it becomes acceptable to not abide by the law.... very dangerous slippery slope consevratives with this flaunting of the law contiuing... you guys have have decided that if you don't like the rules you are not going to play by them... sorry it but it doesn't work like that.

[CubanMustGo]

LOL at sheriffs deciding what law is and isn't cons utional.

[boutons_deux]

LOL at sheriffs deciding what law is and isn't cons utional.

sheriff as supreme Constructional interpreter and enforcer (although he is probably not a lawyer, nor college educated, and elected by corporate money) is EXACTLY what these assholes believe:

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

[Winehole23]

Funny to think that 150 years after the civil war a black president has declared war on southern conservatives.

read the proposed policy. where does Obama declare war on Southerners and conservatives?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-gun-violence/

[mavs>spurs]

Looks like this morning libs had to get DOOOOOOOOOOOWN on dem knees and SUCK IT!

[Winehole23]

you pissed your pants, even threatened insurrection and race war, over nothing. you look very ridiculous right now.

[Th'Pusher]

you pissed your pants, even threatened insurrection and race war, over nothing. you look very ridiculous right now.

[mavs>spurs]

Fear of patriots and the threat of revolution are what saved the day, you can thank me later.

[mavs>spurs]

Lol never threatened race war, only in your preprogrammed mind does standing up for the cons ution = racist

[Winehole23]

Fear of patriots and the threat of revolution are what saved the day, you can thank me later.

lol you taking credit for Obama's executive orders. you're obviously deluded.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Lol never threatened race war, only in your preprogrammed mind does standing up for the cons ution = racist

you did hope someone's wife was raped...

[mavs>spurs]

That isn't threatening race war

[Winehole23]

my bad. you didn't. I misread a semi-grammatical post. you did piss your pants, though.

[Th'Pusher]

m>s is the definition of the common rabble that right-wing media types target when they are looking to rile up the base for revenue and ratings.

[LnGrrrR]

TEXAS CALLIN YOU PUSSY ING LIBS OUT BOYS, bring it. I'll be volunteering with the police when this pops off providing support, I encourage any real men to join.

I thought you were a thug? Now you want to be a policeman?

[ChumpDumper]

m>s is just another faux conservative who lost his .

Everyone here knew they weren't coming to take anyone's guns.

[Koolaid_Man]

I'm not a "repub" so I don't think you will accept my answer. I see it simply that the likes of such weapons are not employed, even today, buy our modernized militia. The National Guard.

The militia was meant as a ground force.

Now I will accept that since the government has taken on the role of have a 24/7 military, that restrictions can be made on the degree of weapons available to the public. I think any ban of semiautomatic rifles or lesser weapons would be wrong, as for people could possible be in an "urban warfare" environment should we be invaded.

So the "right to bear arms" means that we must keep up with semi-automatic weapon technology that the merchants of death come out with...So you have your guns (and so do I ) does that mean that it's a violation of my rights if Obama stops me from purchasing newer gun models if he deems it a public safety risk...for example what if gun makers developed a gun or a weapon (similar to the ones on Men in Black) that shot Gamma Rays instead of bullets..and that would destroy anything within a 20 ft radius...should we ban those or would it be an infringement upon our cons utional right to buy the latest and greatest new "modern militia" weaponry?

[mavs>spurs]

everyone already knew

[ChumpDumper]

everyone already knew

Yep, many said it.

[mavs>spurs]

yeah many did

suck my long rifle barrel resembling , !!!